[PATCH 0/4] drm DP MST fixes

[PATCH 0/4] drm DP MST fixes

[Alex Deucher]

I've applied these to my tree.  Resending with Acks and stable
cc'ed as per Dave's request.

Mykola Lysenko (4):
  drm/dp/mst: process broadcast messages correctly
  drm/dp/mst: always send reply for UP request
  drm/dp/mst: fix in MSTB RAD initialization
  drm/dp/mst: fix in RAD element access

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h       |   2 -
 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

-- 
2.5.0

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[PATCH 1/4] drm/dp/mst: process broadcast messages correctly

[Alex Deucher]

From: Mykola Lysenko <Mykola.Lysenko@amd.com>

In case broadcast message received in UP request,
RAD cannot be used to identify message originator.
Message should be parsed, originator should be found
by GUID from parsed message.

Also reply with broadcast in case broadcast message
received (for now it is always broadcast)

Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mykola Lysenko <Mykola.Lysenko@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index c5a942b..7710de6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -1215,6 +1215,50 @@ out:
 	return mstb;
 }
 
+static struct drm_dp_mst_branch *get_mst_branch_device_by_guid_helper(
+	struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb,
+	uint8_t *guid)
+{
+	struct drm_dp_mst_branch *found_mstb;
+	struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(port, &mstb->ports, next) {
+		if (!port->mstb)
+			continue;
+
+		if (port->guid_valid && memcmp(port->guid, guid, 16) == 0)
+			return port->mstb;
+
+		found_mstb = get_mst_branch_device_by_guid_helper(port->mstb, guid);
+
+		if (found_mstb)
+			return found_mstb;
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static struct drm_dp_mst_branch *drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device_by_guid(
+	struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
+	uint8_t *guid)
+{
+	struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb;
+
+	/* find the port by iterating down */
+	mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
+
+	if (mgr->guid_valid && memcmp(mgr->guid, guid, 16) == 0)
+		mstb = mgr->mst_primary;
+	else
+		mstb = get_mst_branch_device_by_guid_helper(mgr->mst_primary, guid);
+
+	if (mstb)
+		kref_get(&mstb->kref);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
+	return mstb;
+}
+
 static void drm_dp_check_and_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 					       struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb)
 {
@@ -1325,6 +1369,7 @@ static int set_hdr_from_dst_qlock(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_hdr *hdr,
 				  struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg)
 {
 	struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb = txmsg->dst;
+	u8 req_type;
 
 	/* both msg slots are full */
 	if (txmsg->seqno == -1) {
@@ -1341,7 +1386,13 @@ static int set_hdr_from_dst_qlock(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_hdr *hdr,
 			txmsg->seqno = 1;
 		mstb->tx_slots[txmsg->seqno] = txmsg;
 	}
-	hdr->broadcast = 0;
+
+	req_type = txmsg->msg[0] & 0x7f;
+	if (req_type == DP_CONNECTION_STATUS_NOTIFY ||
+		req_type == DP_RESOURCE_STATUS_NOTIFY)
+		hdr->broadcast = 1;
+	else
+		hdr->broadcast = 0;
 	hdr->path_msg = txmsg->path_msg;
 	hdr->lct = mstb->lct;
 	hdr->lcr = mstb->lct - 1;
@@ -2157,28 +2208,50 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
 
 	if (mgr->up_req_recv.have_eomt) {
 		struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body msg;
-		struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb;
+		struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb = NULL;
 		bool seqno;
-		mstb = drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device(mgr,
-						    mgr->up_req_recv.initial_hdr.lct,
-						    mgr->up_req_recv.initial_hdr.rad);
-		if (!mstb) {
-			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Got MST reply from unknown device %d\n", mgr->up_req_recv.initial_hdr.lct);
-			memset(&mgr->up_req_recv, 0, sizeof(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_rx));
-			return 0;
+
+		if (!mgr->up_req_recv.initial_hdr.broadcast) {
+			mstb = drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device(mgr,
+							    mgr->up_req_recv.initial_hdr.lct,
+							    mgr->up_req_recv.initial_hdr.rad);
+			if (!mstb) {
+				DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Got MST reply from unknown device %d\n", mgr->up_req_recv.initial_hdr.lct);
+				memset(&mgr->up_req_recv, 0, sizeof(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_rx));
+				return 0;
+			}
 		}
 
 		seqno = mgr->up_req_recv.initial_hdr.seqno;
 		drm_dp_sideband_parse_req(&mgr->up_req_recv, &msg);
 
 		if (msg.req_type == DP_CONNECTION_STATUS_NOTIFY) {
-			drm_dp_send_up_ack_reply(mgr, mstb, msg.req_type, seqno, false);
+			drm_dp_send_up_ack_reply(mgr, mgr->mst_primary, msg.req_type, seqno, false);
+
+			if (!mstb)
+				mstb = drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device_by_guid(mgr, msg.u.conn_stat.guid);
+
+			if (!mstb) {
+				DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Got MST reply from unknown device %d\n", mgr->up_req_recv.initial_hdr.lct);
+				memset(&mgr->up_req_recv, 0, sizeof(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_rx));
+				return 0;
+			}
+
 			drm_dp_update_port(mstb, &msg.u.conn_stat);
 			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Got CSN: pn: %d ldps:%d ddps: %d mcs: %d ip: %d pdt: %d\n", msg.u.conn_stat.port_number, msg.u.conn_stat.legacy_device_plug_status, msg.u.conn_stat.displayport_device_plug_status, msg.u.conn_stat.message_capability_status, msg.u.conn_stat.input_port, msg.u.conn_stat.peer_device_type);
 			(*mgr->cbs->hotplug)(mgr);
 
 		} else if (msg.req_type == DP_RESOURCE_STATUS_NOTIFY) {
-			drm_dp_send_up_ack_reply(mgr, mstb, msg.req_type, seqno, false);
+			drm_dp_send_up_ack_reply(mgr, mgr->mst_primary, msg.req_type, seqno, false);
+			if (!mstb)
+				mstb = drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device_by_guid(mgr, msg.u.resource_stat.guid);
+
+			if (!mstb) {
+				DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Got MST reply from unknown device %d\n", mgr->up_req_recv.initial_hdr.lct);
+				memset(&mgr->up_req_recv, 0, sizeof(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_rx));
+				return 0;
+			}
+
 			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Got RSN: pn: %d avail_pbn %d\n", msg.u.resource_stat.port_number, msg.u.resource_stat.available_pbn);
 		}
 
-- 
2.5.0

[PATCH 2/4] drm/dp/mst: always send reply for UP request

[Alex Deucher]

From: Mykola Lysenko <Mykola.Lysenko@amd.com>

We should always send reply for UP request in order
to make downstream device clean-up resources appropriately.

Issue was that reply for UP request was sent only once.

Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mykola Lysenko <Mykola.Lysenko@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
 include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h       |  2 --
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 7710de6..ca92a32 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -1494,26 +1494,18 @@ static void process_single_down_tx_qlock(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
 }
 
 /* called holding qlock */
-static void process_single_up_tx_qlock(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
+static void process_single_up_tx_qlock(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
+				       struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg)
 {
-	struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg;
 	int ret;
 
 	/* construct a chunk from the first msg in the tx_msg queue */
-	if (list_empty(&mgr->tx_msg_upq)) {
-		mgr->tx_up_in_progress = false;
-		return;
-	}
-
-	txmsg = list_first_entry(&mgr->tx_msg_upq, struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx, next);
 	ret = process_single_tx_qlock(mgr, txmsg, true);
-	if (ret == 1) {
-		/* up txmsgs aren't put in slots - so free after we send it */
-		list_del(&txmsg->next);
-		kfree(txmsg);
-	} else if (ret)
+
+	if (ret != 1)
 		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to send msg in q %d\n", ret);
-	mgr->tx_up_in_progress = true;
+
+	txmsg->dst->tx_slots[txmsg->seqno] = NULL;
 }
 
 static void drm_dp_queue_down_tx(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
@@ -1907,11 +1899,12 @@ static int drm_dp_send_up_ack_reply(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 	drm_dp_encode_up_ack_reply(txmsg, req_type);
 
 	mutex_lock(&mgr->qlock);
-	list_add_tail(&txmsg->next, &mgr->tx_msg_upq);
-	if (!mgr->tx_up_in_progress) {
-		process_single_up_tx_qlock(mgr);
-	}
+
+	process_single_up_tx_qlock(mgr, txmsg);
+
 	mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
+
+	kfree(txmsg);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -2843,7 +2836,6 @@ int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 	mutex_init(&mgr->qlock);
 	mutex_init(&mgr->payload_lock);
 	mutex_init(&mgr->destroy_connector_lock);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mgr->tx_msg_upq);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mgr->tx_msg_downq);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mgr->destroy_connector_list);
 	INIT_WORK(&mgr->work, drm_dp_mst_link_probe_work);
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
index 74b5888..4fc55a8 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
@@ -451,9 +451,7 @@ struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr {
 	   the mstb tx_slots and txmsg->state once they are queued */
 	struct mutex qlock;
 	struct list_head tx_msg_downq;
-	struct list_head tx_msg_upq;
 	bool tx_down_in_progress;
-	bool tx_up_in_progress;
 
 	/* payload info + lock for it */
 	struct mutex payload_lock;
-- 
2.5.0

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[PATCH 3/4] drm/dp/mst: fix in MSTB RAD initialization

[Alex Deucher]

From: Mykola Lysenko <Mykola.Lysenko@amd.com>

This fix is needed to support more then two
branch displays, so RAD address consist at
least of 2 elements

Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mykola Lysenko <Mykola.Lysenko@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index ca92a32..d809ce8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -978,17 +978,17 @@ static struct drm_dp_mst_port *drm_dp_get_port(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, u
 static u8 drm_dp_calculate_rad(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port,
 				 u8 *rad)
 {
-	int lct = port->parent->lct;
+	int parent_lct = port->parent->lct;
 	int shift = 4;
-	int idx = lct / 2;
-	if (lct > 1) {
-		memcpy(rad, port->parent->rad, idx);
-		shift = (lct % 2) ? 4 : 0;
+	int idx = (parent_lct - 1) / 2;
+	if (parent_lct > 1) {
+		memcpy(rad, port->parent->rad, idx + 1);
+		shift = (parent_lct % 2) ? 4 : 0;
 	} else
 		rad[0] = 0;
 
 	rad[idx] |= port->port_num << shift;
-	return lct + 1;
+	return parent_lct + 1;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.5.0

[PATCH 4/4] drm/dp/mst: fix in RAD element access

[Alex Deucher]

From: Mykola Lysenko <Mykola.Lysenko@amd.com>

This is needed to receive correct port
number from RAD, so MSTB could be found

Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mykola Lysenko <Mykola.Lysenko@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index d809ce8..6ed90a2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ static void build_mst_prop_path(const struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb,
 	snprintf(proppath, proppath_size, "mst:%d", mstb->mgr->conn_base_id);
 	for (i = 0; i < (mstb->lct - 1); i++) {
 		int shift = (i % 2) ? 0 : 4;
-		int port_num = mstb->rad[i / 2] >> shift;
+		int port_num = (mstb->rad[i / 2] >> shift) & 0xf;
 		snprintf(temp, sizeof(temp), "-%d", port_num);
 		strlcat(proppath, temp, proppath_size);
 	}
@@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ static struct drm_dp_mst_branch *drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device(struct drm_dp_mst_
 
 	for (i = 0; i < lct - 1; i++) {
 		int shift = (i % 2) ? 0 : 4;
-		int port_num = rad[i / 2] >> shift;
+		int port_num = (rad[i / 2] >> shift) & 0xf;
 
 		list_for_each_entry(port, &mstb->ports, next) {
 			if (port->port_num == port_num) {
-- 
2.5.0