dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	syzbot+fb77e97ebf0612ee6914@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Limit to INT_MAX in create_blob ioctl
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 19:03:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191106170317.GU1208@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191106164755.31478-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 05:47:55PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The hardened usercpy code is too paranoid ever since:
> 
> commit 6a30afa8c1fbde5f10f9c584c2992aa3c7f7a8fe
> Author: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Date:   Wed Nov 6 16:07:01 2019 +1100
> 
>     uaccess: disallow > INT_MAX copy sizes
> 
> Code itself should have been fine as-is.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+fb77e97ebf0612ee6914@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 6a30afa8c1fb ("uaccess: disallow > INT_MAX copy sizes")
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> --
> Kees/Andrew,
> 
> Since this is -mm can I have a stable sha1 or something for
> referencing? Or do you want to include this in the -mm patch bomb for
> the merge window?
> -Daniel
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c
> index 892ce636ef72..6ee04803c362 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c
> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ drm_property_create_blob(struct drm_device *dev, size_t length,
>  	struct drm_property_blob *blob;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (!length || length > ULONG_MAX - sizeof(struct drm_property_blob))
> +	if (!length || length > INT_MAX - sizeof(struct drm_property_blob))
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

INT_MAX should be more than enough.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

>  
>  	blob = kvzalloc(sizeof(struct drm_property_blob)+length, GFP_KERNEL);
> -- 
> 2.24.0.rc2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	syzbot+fb77e97ebf0612ee6914@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Limit to INT_MAX in create_blob ioctl
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 19:03:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191106170317.GU1208@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191106170317.qgP2nBn7NqpX85Bw2pbW8DyYx8zRQCj_QbsC7XurExc@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191106164755.31478-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 05:47:55PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The hardened usercpy code is too paranoid ever since:
> 
> commit 6a30afa8c1fbde5f10f9c584c2992aa3c7f7a8fe
> Author: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Date:   Wed Nov 6 16:07:01 2019 +1100
> 
>     uaccess: disallow > INT_MAX copy sizes
> 
> Code itself should have been fine as-is.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+fb77e97ebf0612ee6914@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 6a30afa8c1fb ("uaccess: disallow > INT_MAX copy sizes")
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> --
> Kees/Andrew,
> 
> Since this is -mm can I have a stable sha1 or something for
> referencing? Or do you want to include this in the -mm patch bomb for
> the merge window?
> -Daniel
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c
> index 892ce636ef72..6ee04803c362 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c
> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ drm_property_create_blob(struct drm_device *dev, size_t length,
>  	struct drm_property_blob *blob;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (!length || length > ULONG_MAX - sizeof(struct drm_property_blob))
> +	if (!length || length > INT_MAX - sizeof(struct drm_property_blob))
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

INT_MAX should be more than enough.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

>  
>  	blob = kvzalloc(sizeof(struct drm_property_blob)+length, GFP_KERNEL);
> -- 
> 2.24.0.rc2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-06 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-06 16:47 [PATCH] drm: Limit to INT_MAX in create_blob ioctl Daniel Vetter
2019-11-06 16:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-06 17:03 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-11-06 17:03   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-11-06 17:24 ` Kees Cook
2019-11-06 17:24   ` Kees Cook
2019-11-06 17:56   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-06 17:56     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-06 18:13   ` Andrew Morton
2019-11-06 18:13     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191106170317.GU1208@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=syzbot+fb77e97ebf0612ee6914@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).