dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH libdrm] intel: drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* on platforms w/o HW tiling
@ 2020-01-20 16:43 Imre Deak
  2020-01-21 18:52 ` Emil Velikov
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Imre Deak @ 2020-01-20 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, dri-devel

Platforms without a HW detiler doesn't support the get_tiling IOCTL.
Fix the drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* functions assuming the default
no-tiling, no-swizzling setting for the GEM buffer in this case.

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
 intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
index fbf48730..fc249ef1 100644
--- a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
+++ b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
@@ -1069,6 +1069,27 @@ check_bo_alloc_userptr(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
 					  tiling_mode, stride, size, flags);
 }
 
+static int get_tiling_mode(drm_intel_bufmgr_gem *bufmgr_gem,
+			   uint32_t gem_handle,
+			   uint32_t *tiling_mode,
+			   uint32_t *swizzle_mode)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling;
+	int ret;
+
+	memclear(get_tiling);
+	ret = drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd,
+		       DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_TILING,
+		       &get_tiling);
+	if (ret != 0 && errno != EOPNOTSUPP)
+		return ret;
+
+	*tiling_mode = get_tiling.tiling_mode;
+	*swizzle_mode = get_tiling.swizzle_mode;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * Returns a drm_intel_bo wrapping the given buffer object handle.
  *
@@ -1084,7 +1105,6 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_name(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
 	drm_intel_bo_gem *bo_gem;
 	int ret;
 	struct drm_gem_open open_arg;
-	struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling;
 
 	/* At the moment most applications only have a few named bo.
 	 * For instance, in a DRI client only the render buffers passed
@@ -1146,16 +1166,11 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_name(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
 	HASH_ADD(name_hh, bufmgr_gem->name_table,
 		 global_name, sizeof(bo_gem->global_name), bo_gem);
 
-	memclear(get_tiling);
-	get_tiling.handle = bo_gem->gem_handle;
-	ret = drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd,
-		       DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_TILING,
-		       &get_tiling);
+	ret = get_tiling_mode(bufmgr_gem, bo_gem->gem_handle,
+			      &bo_gem->tiling_mode, &bo_gem->swizzle_mode);
 	if (ret != 0)
 		goto err_unref;
 
-	bo_gem->tiling_mode = get_tiling.tiling_mode;
-	bo_gem->swizzle_mode = get_tiling.swizzle_mode;
 	/* XXX stride is unknown */
 	drm_intel_bo_gem_set_in_aperture_size(bufmgr_gem, bo_gem, 0);
 	DBG("bo_create_from_handle: %d (%s)\n", handle, bo_gem->name);
@@ -2634,7 +2649,6 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_prime(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr, int prime_fd, int s
 	int ret;
 	uint32_t handle;
 	drm_intel_bo_gem *bo_gem;
-	struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling;
 
 	pthread_mutex_lock(&bufmgr_gem->lock);
 	ret = drmPrimeFDToHandle(bufmgr_gem->fd, prime_fd, &handle);
@@ -2688,15 +2702,11 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_prime(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr, int prime_fd, int s
 	bo_gem->has_error = false;
 	bo_gem->reusable = false;
 
-	memclear(get_tiling);
-	get_tiling.handle = bo_gem->gem_handle;
-	if (drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd,
-		     DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_TILING,
-		     &get_tiling))
+	ret = get_tiling_mode(bufmgr_gem, handle,
+			      &bo_gem->tiling_mode, &bo_gem->swizzle_mode);
+	if (ret)
 		goto err;
 
-	bo_gem->tiling_mode = get_tiling.tiling_mode;
-	bo_gem->swizzle_mode = get_tiling.swizzle_mode;
 	/* XXX stride is unknown */
 	drm_intel_bo_gem_set_in_aperture_size(bufmgr_gem, bo_gem, 0);
 
-- 
2.23.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH libdrm] intel: drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* on platforms w/o HW tiling
  2020-01-20 16:43 [PATCH libdrm] intel: drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* on platforms w/o HW tiling Imre Deak
@ 2020-01-21 18:52 ` Emil Velikov
  2020-01-21 22:40 ` Eric Engestrom
  2020-01-22  9:31 ` [PATCH libdrm v2] " Imre Deak
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Emil Velikov @ 2020-01-21 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Imre Deak; +Cc: Intel Graphics Development, ML dri-devel

On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 16:43, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Platforms without a HW detiler doesn't support the get_tiling IOCTL.
> Fix the drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* functions assuming the default
> no-tiling, no-swizzling setting for the GEM buffer in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

Seems like it this can happen only in vgpu cases.... which explains
why it was not raised earlier. Regardless:
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>

Aside: might want to do similar patch for mesa. Be that for
classic/i965, gallium/iris and/or the Vulkan ANV driver.

-Emil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH libdrm] intel: drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* on platforms w/o HW tiling
  2020-01-20 16:43 [PATCH libdrm] intel: drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* on platforms w/o HW tiling Imre Deak
  2020-01-21 18:52 ` Emil Velikov
@ 2020-01-21 22:40 ` Eric Engestrom
  2020-01-21 23:38   ` Imre Deak
  2020-01-22  9:31 ` [PATCH libdrm v2] " Imre Deak
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Engestrom @ 2020-01-21 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Imre Deak; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel

On Monday, 2020-01-20 18:43:43 +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> Platforms without a HW detiler doesn't support the get_tiling IOCTL.
> Fix the drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* functions assuming the default
> no-tiling, no-swizzling setting for the GEM buffer in this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
>  intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
> index fbf48730..fc249ef1 100644
> --- a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
> +++ b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
> @@ -1069,6 +1069,27 @@ check_bo_alloc_userptr(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
>  					  tiling_mode, stride, size, flags);
>  }
>  
> +static int get_tiling_mode(drm_intel_bufmgr_gem *bufmgr_gem,
> +			   uint32_t gem_handle,
> +			   uint32_t *tiling_mode,
> +			   uint32_t *swizzle_mode)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	memclear(get_tiling);
> +	ret = drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd,
> +		       DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_TILING,
> +		       &get_tiling);

You're missing `get_tiling.handle = gem_handle;`

Or better yet, just initialise `get_tiling` and get rid of the memclear():
  struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling = {
    .handle = gem_handle,
  };

With either fix:
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>

FYI, I've posted the following MR for the equivalent Mesa changes:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/3497

> +	if (ret != 0 && errno != EOPNOTSUPP)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	*tiling_mode = get_tiling.tiling_mode;
> +	*swizzle_mode = get_tiling.swizzle_mode;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * Returns a drm_intel_bo wrapping the given buffer object handle.
>   *
> @@ -1084,7 +1105,6 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_name(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
>  	drm_intel_bo_gem *bo_gem;
>  	int ret;
>  	struct drm_gem_open open_arg;
> -	struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling;
>  
>  	/* At the moment most applications only have a few named bo.
>  	 * For instance, in a DRI client only the render buffers passed
> @@ -1146,16 +1166,11 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_name(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
>  	HASH_ADD(name_hh, bufmgr_gem->name_table,
>  		 global_name, sizeof(bo_gem->global_name), bo_gem);
>  
> -	memclear(get_tiling);
> -	get_tiling.handle = bo_gem->gem_handle;
> -	ret = drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd,
> -		       DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_TILING,
> -		       &get_tiling);
> +	ret = get_tiling_mode(bufmgr_gem, bo_gem->gem_handle,
> +			      &bo_gem->tiling_mode, &bo_gem->swizzle_mode);
>  	if (ret != 0)
>  		goto err_unref;
>  
> -	bo_gem->tiling_mode = get_tiling.tiling_mode;
> -	bo_gem->swizzle_mode = get_tiling.swizzle_mode;
>  	/* XXX stride is unknown */
>  	drm_intel_bo_gem_set_in_aperture_size(bufmgr_gem, bo_gem, 0);
>  	DBG("bo_create_from_handle: %d (%s)\n", handle, bo_gem->name);
> @@ -2634,7 +2649,6 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_prime(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr, int prime_fd, int s
>  	int ret;
>  	uint32_t handle;
>  	drm_intel_bo_gem *bo_gem;
> -	struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling;
>  
>  	pthread_mutex_lock(&bufmgr_gem->lock);
>  	ret = drmPrimeFDToHandle(bufmgr_gem->fd, prime_fd, &handle);
> @@ -2688,15 +2702,11 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_prime(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr, int prime_fd, int s
>  	bo_gem->has_error = false;
>  	bo_gem->reusable = false;
>  
> -	memclear(get_tiling);
> -	get_tiling.handle = bo_gem->gem_handle;
> -	if (drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd,
> -		     DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_TILING,
> -		     &get_tiling))
> +	ret = get_tiling_mode(bufmgr_gem, handle,
> +			      &bo_gem->tiling_mode, &bo_gem->swizzle_mode);
> +	if (ret)
>  		goto err;
>  
> -	bo_gem->tiling_mode = get_tiling.tiling_mode;
> -	bo_gem->swizzle_mode = get_tiling.swizzle_mode;
>  	/* XXX stride is unknown */
>  	drm_intel_bo_gem_set_in_aperture_size(bufmgr_gem, bo_gem, 0);
>  
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH libdrm] intel: drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* on platforms w/o HW tiling
  2020-01-21 22:40 ` Eric Engestrom
@ 2020-01-21 23:38   ` Imre Deak
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Imre Deak @ 2020-01-21 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Engestrom; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 10:40:48PM +0000, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Monday, 2020-01-20 18:43:43 +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Platforms without a HW detiler doesn't support the get_tiling IOCTL.
> > Fix the drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* functions assuming the default
> > no-tiling, no-swizzling setting for the GEM buffer in this case.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
> > index fbf48730..fc249ef1 100644
> > --- a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
> > +++ b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
> > @@ -1069,6 +1069,27 @@ check_bo_alloc_userptr(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
> >  					  tiling_mode, stride, size, flags);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int get_tiling_mode(drm_intel_bufmgr_gem *bufmgr_gem,
> > +			   uint32_t gem_handle,
> > +			   uint32_t *tiling_mode,
> > +			   uint32_t *swizzle_mode)
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	memclear(get_tiling);
> > +	ret = drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd,
> > +		       DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_TILING,
> > +		       &get_tiling);
> 
> You're missing `get_tiling.handle = gem_handle;`

Err, thanks for catching that, will resend fixing it.

> Or better yet, just initialise `get_tiling` and get rid of the memclear():
>   struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling = {
>     .handle = gem_handle,
>   };
> 
> With either fix:
> Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
> 
> FYI, I've posted the following MR for the equivalent Mesa changes:
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/3497
> 
> > +	if (ret != 0 && errno != EOPNOTSUPP)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	*tiling_mode = get_tiling.tiling_mode;
> > +	*swizzle_mode = get_tiling.swizzle_mode;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * Returns a drm_intel_bo wrapping the given buffer object handle.
> >   *
> > @@ -1084,7 +1105,6 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_name(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
> >  	drm_intel_bo_gem *bo_gem;
> >  	int ret;
> >  	struct drm_gem_open open_arg;
> > -	struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling;
> >  
> >  	/* At the moment most applications only have a few named bo.
> >  	 * For instance, in a DRI client only the render buffers passed
> > @@ -1146,16 +1166,11 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_name(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
> >  	HASH_ADD(name_hh, bufmgr_gem->name_table,
> >  		 global_name, sizeof(bo_gem->global_name), bo_gem);
> >  
> > -	memclear(get_tiling);
> > -	get_tiling.handle = bo_gem->gem_handle;
> > -	ret = drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd,
> > -		       DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_TILING,
> > -		       &get_tiling);
> > +	ret = get_tiling_mode(bufmgr_gem, bo_gem->gem_handle,
> > +			      &bo_gem->tiling_mode, &bo_gem->swizzle_mode);
> >  	if (ret != 0)
> >  		goto err_unref;
> >  
> > -	bo_gem->tiling_mode = get_tiling.tiling_mode;
> > -	bo_gem->swizzle_mode = get_tiling.swizzle_mode;
> >  	/* XXX stride is unknown */
> >  	drm_intel_bo_gem_set_in_aperture_size(bufmgr_gem, bo_gem, 0);
> >  	DBG("bo_create_from_handle: %d (%s)\n", handle, bo_gem->name);
> > @@ -2634,7 +2649,6 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_prime(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr, int prime_fd, int s
> >  	int ret;
> >  	uint32_t handle;
> >  	drm_intel_bo_gem *bo_gem;
> > -	struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling;
> >  
> >  	pthread_mutex_lock(&bufmgr_gem->lock);
> >  	ret = drmPrimeFDToHandle(bufmgr_gem->fd, prime_fd, &handle);
> > @@ -2688,15 +2702,11 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_prime(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr, int prime_fd, int s
> >  	bo_gem->has_error = false;
> >  	bo_gem->reusable = false;
> >  
> > -	memclear(get_tiling);
> > -	get_tiling.handle = bo_gem->gem_handle;
> > -	if (drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd,
> > -		     DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_TILING,
> > -		     &get_tiling))
> > +	ret = get_tiling_mode(bufmgr_gem, handle,
> > +			      &bo_gem->tiling_mode, &bo_gem->swizzle_mode);
> > +	if (ret)
> >  		goto err;
> >  
> > -	bo_gem->tiling_mode = get_tiling.tiling_mode;
> > -	bo_gem->swizzle_mode = get_tiling.swizzle_mode;
> >  	/* XXX stride is unknown */
> >  	drm_intel_bo_gem_set_in_aperture_size(bufmgr_gem, bo_gem, 0);
> >  
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH libdrm v2] intel: drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* on platforms w/o HW tiling
  2020-01-20 16:43 [PATCH libdrm] intel: drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* on platforms w/o HW tiling Imre Deak
  2020-01-21 18:52 ` Emil Velikov
  2020-01-21 22:40 ` Eric Engestrom
@ 2020-01-22  9:31 ` Imre Deak
  2020-01-28 13:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Imre Deak
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Imre Deak @ 2020-01-22  9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, dri-devel; +Cc: Eric Engestrom, Emil Velikov

Platforms without a HW detiler doesn't support the get_tiling IOCTL.
Fix the drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* functions assuming the default
no-tiling, no-swizzling setting for the GEM buffer in this case.

v2:
- Add the missing gem handle IOCTL parameter. (Eric)

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
---
 intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
index fbf48730..ade13a4c 100644
--- a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
+++ b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
@@ -1069,6 +1069,28 @@ check_bo_alloc_userptr(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
 					  tiling_mode, stride, size, flags);
 }
 
+static int get_tiling_mode(drm_intel_bufmgr_gem *bufmgr_gem,
+			   uint32_t gem_handle,
+			   uint32_t *tiling_mode,
+			   uint32_t *swizzle_mode)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling = {
+		.handle = gem_handle,
+	};
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd,
+		       DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_TILING,
+		       &get_tiling);
+	if (ret != 0 && errno != EOPNOTSUPP)
+		return ret;
+
+	*tiling_mode = get_tiling.tiling_mode;
+	*swizzle_mode = get_tiling.swizzle_mode;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * Returns a drm_intel_bo wrapping the given buffer object handle.
  *
@@ -1084,7 +1106,6 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_name(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
 	drm_intel_bo_gem *bo_gem;
 	int ret;
 	struct drm_gem_open open_arg;
-	struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling;
 
 	/* At the moment most applications only have a few named bo.
 	 * For instance, in a DRI client only the render buffers passed
@@ -1146,16 +1167,11 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_name(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
 	HASH_ADD(name_hh, bufmgr_gem->name_table,
 		 global_name, sizeof(bo_gem->global_name), bo_gem);
 
-	memclear(get_tiling);
-	get_tiling.handle = bo_gem->gem_handle;
-	ret = drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd,
-		       DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_TILING,
-		       &get_tiling);
+	ret = get_tiling_mode(bufmgr_gem, bo_gem->gem_handle,
+			      &bo_gem->tiling_mode, &bo_gem->swizzle_mode);
 	if (ret != 0)
 		goto err_unref;
 
-	bo_gem->tiling_mode = get_tiling.tiling_mode;
-	bo_gem->swizzle_mode = get_tiling.swizzle_mode;
 	/* XXX stride is unknown */
 	drm_intel_bo_gem_set_in_aperture_size(bufmgr_gem, bo_gem, 0);
 	DBG("bo_create_from_handle: %d (%s)\n", handle, bo_gem->name);
@@ -2634,7 +2650,6 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_prime(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr, int prime_fd, int s
 	int ret;
 	uint32_t handle;
 	drm_intel_bo_gem *bo_gem;
-	struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling;
 
 	pthread_mutex_lock(&bufmgr_gem->lock);
 	ret = drmPrimeFDToHandle(bufmgr_gem->fd, prime_fd, &handle);
@@ -2688,15 +2703,11 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_prime(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr, int prime_fd, int s
 	bo_gem->has_error = false;
 	bo_gem->reusable = false;
 
-	memclear(get_tiling);
-	get_tiling.handle = bo_gem->gem_handle;
-	if (drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd,
-		     DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_TILING,
-		     &get_tiling))
+	ret = get_tiling_mode(bufmgr_gem, handle,
+			      &bo_gem->tiling_mode, &bo_gem->swizzle_mode);
+	if (ret)
 		goto err;
 
-	bo_gem->tiling_mode = get_tiling.tiling_mode;
-	bo_gem->swizzle_mode = get_tiling.swizzle_mode;
 	/* XXX stride is unknown */
 	drm_intel_bo_gem_set_in_aperture_size(bufmgr_gem, bo_gem, 0);
 
-- 
2.23.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH libdrm v2] intel: drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* on platforms w/o HW tiling
  2020-01-22  9:31 ` [PATCH libdrm v2] " Imre Deak
@ 2020-01-28 13:38   ` Imre Deak
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Imre Deak @ 2020-01-28 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, dri-devel, Eric Engestrom, Emil Velikov,
	Juha-Pekka Heikkilä

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:31:22AM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> Platforms without a HW detiler doesn't support the get_tiling IOCTL.
> Fix the drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* functions assuming the default
> no-tiling, no-swizzling setting for the GEM buffer in this case.
> 
> v2:
> - Add the missing gem handle IOCTL parameter. (Eric)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>

Thanks for the reviewes, pushed to
gitlab.freedesktop.org:mesa/drm.git master

> ---
>  intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
> index fbf48730..ade13a4c 100644
> --- a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
> +++ b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
> @@ -1069,6 +1069,28 @@ check_bo_alloc_userptr(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
>  					  tiling_mode, stride, size, flags);
>  }
>  
> +static int get_tiling_mode(drm_intel_bufmgr_gem *bufmgr_gem,
> +			   uint32_t gem_handle,
> +			   uint32_t *tiling_mode,
> +			   uint32_t *swizzle_mode)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling = {
> +		.handle = gem_handle,
> +	};
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd,
> +		       DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_TILING,
> +		       &get_tiling);
> +	if (ret != 0 && errno != EOPNOTSUPP)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	*tiling_mode = get_tiling.tiling_mode;
> +	*swizzle_mode = get_tiling.swizzle_mode;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * Returns a drm_intel_bo wrapping the given buffer object handle.
>   *
> @@ -1084,7 +1106,6 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_name(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
>  	drm_intel_bo_gem *bo_gem;
>  	int ret;
>  	struct drm_gem_open open_arg;
> -	struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling;
>  
>  	/* At the moment most applications only have a few named bo.
>  	 * For instance, in a DRI client only the render buffers passed
> @@ -1146,16 +1167,11 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_name(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
>  	HASH_ADD(name_hh, bufmgr_gem->name_table,
>  		 global_name, sizeof(bo_gem->global_name), bo_gem);
>  
> -	memclear(get_tiling);
> -	get_tiling.handle = bo_gem->gem_handle;
> -	ret = drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd,
> -		       DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_TILING,
> -		       &get_tiling);
> +	ret = get_tiling_mode(bufmgr_gem, bo_gem->gem_handle,
> +			      &bo_gem->tiling_mode, &bo_gem->swizzle_mode);
>  	if (ret != 0)
>  		goto err_unref;
>  
> -	bo_gem->tiling_mode = get_tiling.tiling_mode;
> -	bo_gem->swizzle_mode = get_tiling.swizzle_mode;
>  	/* XXX stride is unknown */
>  	drm_intel_bo_gem_set_in_aperture_size(bufmgr_gem, bo_gem, 0);
>  	DBG("bo_create_from_handle: %d (%s)\n", handle, bo_gem->name);
> @@ -2634,7 +2650,6 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_prime(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr, int prime_fd, int s
>  	int ret;
>  	uint32_t handle;
>  	drm_intel_bo_gem *bo_gem;
> -	struct drm_i915_gem_get_tiling get_tiling;
>  
>  	pthread_mutex_lock(&bufmgr_gem->lock);
>  	ret = drmPrimeFDToHandle(bufmgr_gem->fd, prime_fd, &handle);
> @@ -2688,15 +2703,11 @@ drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_prime(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr, int prime_fd, int s
>  	bo_gem->has_error = false;
>  	bo_gem->reusable = false;
>  
> -	memclear(get_tiling);
> -	get_tiling.handle = bo_gem->gem_handle;
> -	if (drmIoctl(bufmgr_gem->fd,
> -		     DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_GET_TILING,
> -		     &get_tiling))
> +	ret = get_tiling_mode(bufmgr_gem, handle,
> +			      &bo_gem->tiling_mode, &bo_gem->swizzle_mode);
> +	if (ret)
>  		goto err;
>  
> -	bo_gem->tiling_mode = get_tiling.tiling_mode;
> -	bo_gem->swizzle_mode = get_tiling.swizzle_mode;
>  	/* XXX stride is unknown */
>  	drm_intel_bo_gem_set_in_aperture_size(bufmgr_gem, bo_gem, 0);
>  
> -- 
> 2.23.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-28 13:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-20 16:43 [PATCH libdrm] intel: drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_* on platforms w/o HW tiling Imre Deak
2020-01-21 18:52 ` Emil Velikov
2020-01-21 22:40 ` Eric Engestrom
2020-01-21 23:38   ` Imre Deak
2020-01-22  9:31 ` [PATCH libdrm v2] " Imre Deak
2020-01-28 13:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Imre Deak

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).