* [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Avoid duplicate HDCP enables
@ 2020-05-20 19:47 Sean Paul
2020-05-21 4:57 ` Ramalingam C
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sean Paul @ 2020-05-20 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel, intel-gfx; +Cc: seanpaul, rodrigo.vivi
From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
If userspace sets the CP property to DESIRED while it's already ENABLED,
the driver will try to re-enable HDCP. On some displays, this will
result in R0' mismatches. I'm guessing this is because the display is
still sending back Ri instead of re-authenticating.
At any rate, we can fix this inefficiency easily enough by just nooping
the DESIRED property set if HDCP is already ENABLED.
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
---
I suspect this is the actual root cause I was chasing with
"drm/i915/hdcp: Add additional R0' wait". I was able to reproduce the
R0` messages by marking HDCP desired while it was already enabled. This
_should_ work, but it seems like some displays handle it more graciously
than others.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
index 2cbc4619b4ce..f770fe0c5595 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
@@ -2156,12 +2156,16 @@ void intel_hdcp_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
}
/*
- * Nothing to do if the state didn't change, or HDCP was activated since
- * the last commit. And also no change in hdcp content type.
+ * Nothing to do if content type is unchanged and one of:
+ * - state didn't change
+ * - HDCP was activated since the last commit
+ * - attempting to set to desired while already enabled
*/
if (old_cp == new_cp ||
(old_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED &&
- new_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED)) {
+ new_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED) ||
+ (old_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED &&
+ new_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED)) {
if (old_state->hdcp_content_type ==
new_state->hdcp_content_type)
return;
--
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Avoid duplicate HDCP enables
2020-05-20 19:47 [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Avoid duplicate HDCP enables Sean Paul
@ 2020-05-21 4:57 ` Ramalingam C
2020-05-21 9:27 ` Anshuman Gupta
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ramalingam C @ 2020-05-21 4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Paul; +Cc: Anshuman Gupta, intel-gfx, seanpaul, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi
On 2020-05-20 at 15:47:44 -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
>
> If userspace sets the CP property to DESIRED while it's already ENABLED,
> the driver will try to re-enable HDCP. On some displays, this will
> result in R0' mismatches. I'm guessing this is because the display is
> still sending back Ri instead of re-authenticating.
>
> At any rate, we can fix this inefficiency easily enough by just nooping
> the DESIRED property set if HDCP is already ENABLED.
Sean,
This will skip the hdcp enable.
But at present too we will be getting below WARN_ON from intel_hdcp_enable,
to indicate userspace is going wrong with request.
drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
hdcp->value == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED);
And if we need to filter this out, could we validate the incoming hdcp request at
drm_atomic_connector_set_property() itself? No point in going into the
atomic commit without a valid request. something like
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
index a1e5e262bae2..d98b2eeae78d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
@@ -746,6 +746,12 @@ static int drm_atomic_connector_set_property(struct drm_connector *connector,
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("only drivers can set CP Enabled\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (config->content_protection_property ==
+ DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED &&
+ val == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED) {
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Redundant req for content protection\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
state->content_protection = val;
} else if (property == config->hdcp_content_type_property) {
state->hdcp_content_type = val;
-Ram
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> I suspect this is the actual root cause I was chasing with
> "drm/i915/hdcp: Add additional R0' wait". I was able to reproduce the
> R0` messages by marking HDCP desired while it was already enabled. This
> _should_ work, but it seems like some displays handle it more graciously
> than others.
>
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> index 2cbc4619b4ce..f770fe0c5595 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> @@ -2156,12 +2156,16 @@ void intel_hdcp_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
> }
>
> /*
> - * Nothing to do if the state didn't change, or HDCP was activated since
> - * the last commit. And also no change in hdcp content type.
> + * Nothing to do if content type is unchanged and one of:
> + * - state didn't change
> + * - HDCP was activated since the last commit
> + * - attempting to set to desired while already enabled
> */
> if (old_cp == new_cp ||
> (old_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED &&
> - new_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED)) {
> + new_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED) ||
> + (old_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED &&
> + new_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED)) {
> if (old_state->hdcp_content_type ==
> new_state->hdcp_content_type)
> return;
> --
> Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Avoid duplicate HDCP enables
2020-05-21 4:57 ` Ramalingam C
@ 2020-05-21 9:27 ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-05-21 13:38 ` Sean Paul
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Gupta @ 2020-05-21 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ramalingam C; +Cc: intel-gfx, seanpaul, dri-devel, rodrigo.vivi, Sean Paul
On 2020-05-21 at 10:27:21 +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> On 2020-05-20 at 15:47:44 -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> > From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> >
> > If userspace sets the CP property to DESIRED while it's already ENABLED,
> > the driver will try to re-enable HDCP. On some displays, this will
> > result in R0' mismatches. I'm guessing this is because the display is
> > still sending back Ri instead of re-authenticating.
> >
> > At any rate, we can fix this inefficiency easily enough by just nooping
> > the DESIRED property set if HDCP is already ENABLED.
AFAIU may below patch also solves above issue implicitly.
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/365758/?series=72251&rev=4
Besides that +1 for below Ram comment, it would be better if such type of duplicate
enable request should filter by drm_atomic_connector_set_property().
Thanks,
Anshuman Gupta.
> Sean,
>
> This will skip the hdcp enable.
>
> But at present too we will be getting below WARN_ON from intel_hdcp_enable,
> to indicate userspace is going wrong with request.
> drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
> hdcp->value == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED);
>
> And if we need to filter this out, could we validate the incoming hdcp request at
> drm_atomic_connector_set_property() itself? No point in going into the
> atomic commit without a valid request. something like
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
> index a1e5e262bae2..d98b2eeae78d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
> @@ -746,6 +746,12 @@ static int drm_atomic_connector_set_property(struct drm_connector *connector,
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("only drivers can set CP Enabled\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> + if (config->content_protection_property ==
> + DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED &&
> + val == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Redundant req for content protection\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> state->content_protection = val;
> } else if (property == config->hdcp_content_type_property) {
> state->hdcp_content_type = val;
>
> -Ram
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > I suspect this is the actual root cause I was chasing with
> > "drm/i915/hdcp: Add additional R0' wait". I was able to reproduce the
> > R0` messages by marking HDCP desired while it was already enabled. This
> > _should_ work, but it seems like some displays handle it more graciously
> > than others.
> >
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 10 +++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > index 2cbc4619b4ce..f770fe0c5595 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > @@ -2156,12 +2156,16 @@ void intel_hdcp_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > - * Nothing to do if the state didn't change, or HDCP was activated since
> > - * the last commit. And also no change in hdcp content type.
> > + * Nothing to do if content type is unchanged and one of:
> > + * - state didn't change
> > + * - HDCP was activated since the last commit
> > + * - attempting to set to desired while already enabled
> > */
> > if (old_cp == new_cp ||
> > (old_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED &&
> > - new_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED)) {
> > + new_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED) ||
> > + (old_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED &&
> > + new_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED)) {
> > if (old_state->hdcp_content_type ==
> > new_state->hdcp_content_type)
> > return;
> > --
> > Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
> >
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Avoid duplicate HDCP enables
2020-05-21 9:27 ` Anshuman Gupta
@ 2020-05-21 13:38 ` Sean Paul
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sean Paul @ 2020-05-21 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Gupta
Cc: Intel Graphics Development, Sean Paul, dri-devel, Rodrigo Vivi
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 5:36 AM Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 2020-05-21 at 10:27:21 +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> > On 2020-05-20 at 15:47:44 -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> > > From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> > >
> > > If userspace sets the CP property to DESIRED while it's already ENABLED,
> > > the driver will try to re-enable HDCP. On some displays, this will
> > > result in R0' mismatches. I'm guessing this is because the display is
> > > still sending back Ri instead of re-authenticating.
> > >
> > > At any rate, we can fix this inefficiency easily enough by just nooping
> > > the DESIRED property set if HDCP is already ENABLED.
> AFAIU may below patch also solves above issue implicitly.
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/365758/?series=72251&rev=4
> Besides that +1 for below Ram comment, it would be better if such type of duplicate
> enable request should filter by drm_atomic_connector_set_property().
Thanks Anshuman, I didn't see that patch. Indeed that seems like it
accomplishes the same thing.
Let's drop this.
Sean
> Thanks,
> Anshuman Gupta.
>
> > Sean,
> >
> > This will skip the hdcp enable.
> >
> > But at present too we will be getting below WARN_ON from intel_hdcp_enable,
> > to indicate userspace is going wrong with request.
> > drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
> > hdcp->value == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED);
> >
> > And if we need to filter this out, could we validate the incoming hdcp request at
> > drm_atomic_connector_set_property() itself? No point in going into the
> > atomic commit without a valid request. something like
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
> > index a1e5e262bae2..d98b2eeae78d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
> > @@ -746,6 +746,12 @@ static int drm_atomic_connector_set_property(struct drm_connector *connector,
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("only drivers can set CP Enabled\n");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > + if (config->content_protection_property ==
> > + DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED &&
> > + val == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED) {
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Redundant req for content protection\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > state->content_protection = val;
> > } else if (property == config->hdcp_content_type_property) {
> > state->hdcp_content_type = val;
> >
> > -Ram
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > I suspect this is the actual root cause I was chasing with
> > > "drm/i915/hdcp: Add additional R0' wait". I was able to reproduce the
> > > R0` messages by marking HDCP desired while it was already enabled. This
> > > _should_ work, but it seems like some displays handle it more graciously
> > > than others.
> > >
> > >
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 10 +++++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > index 2cbc4619b4ce..f770fe0c5595 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > @@ -2156,12 +2156,16 @@ void intel_hdcp_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
> > > }
> > >
> > > /*
> > > - * Nothing to do if the state didn't change, or HDCP was activated since
> > > - * the last commit. And also no change in hdcp content type.
> > > + * Nothing to do if content type is unchanged and one of:
> > > + * - state didn't change
> > > + * - HDCP was activated since the last commit
> > > + * - attempting to set to desired while already enabled
> > > */
> > > if (old_cp == new_cp ||
> > > (old_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED &&
> > > - new_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED)) {
> > > + new_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED) ||
> > > + (old_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED &&
> > > + new_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED)) {
> > > if (old_state->hdcp_content_type ==
> > > new_state->hdcp_content_type)
> > > return;
> > > --
> > > Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
> > >
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-21 13:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-20 19:47 [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Avoid duplicate HDCP enables Sean Paul
2020-05-21 4:57 ` Ramalingam C
2020-05-21 9:27 ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-05-21 13:38 ` Sean Paul
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).