[PATCH] drm/tests: Split up test cases in igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch

[PATCH] drm/tests: Split up test cases in igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch

[Maíra Canal]

The igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() function had a lot of
KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls, all of which ended up allocating and initializing
various test assertion structures on the stack.

This behavior was producing -Wframe-larger-than warnings on PowerPC, i386,
and MIPS architectures, such as:

drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c: In function 'igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch':
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c:271:1: error: the frame size of
3712 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes

So, the igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() test case was split into three
smaller functions: one testing single plane formats, one testing multiple
planes formats, and the other testing tiled formats.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
index 056cb8599d6d..28f2b8f88818 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_block_height(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, drm_format_info_block_height(info, -1));
 }
 
-static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
+static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
 
@@ -175,6 +175,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
 			(uint64_t)UINT_MAX * 4);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 0, (UINT_MAX - 1)),
 			(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) * 4);
+}
+
+static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
 
 	/* Test 2 planes format */
 	info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_NV12);
@@ -249,6 +254,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
 			(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 2, (UINT_MAX - 1) / 2),
 			(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
+}
+
+static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
 
 	/* Test tiled format */
 	info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_X0L2);
@@ -273,7 +283,9 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
 static struct kunit_case drm_format_tests[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_width),
 	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_height),
-	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch),
+	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane),
+	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes),
+	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format),
 	{ }
 };
 
-- 
2.36.1

Re: [PATCH] drm/tests: Split up test cases in igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch

[Guenter Roeck]

On 7/17/22 11:43, Maíra Canal wrote:
> The igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() function had a lot of
> KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls, all of which ended up allocating and initializing
> various test assertion structures on the stack.
> 
> This behavior was producing -Wframe-larger-than warnings on PowerPC, i386,
> and MIPS architectures, such as:
> 
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c: In function 'igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch':
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c:271:1: error: the frame size of
> 3712 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes
> 
> So, the igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() test case was split into three
> smaller functions: one testing single plane formats, one testing multiple
> planes formats, and the other testing tiled formats.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>

I applied the patch to next-20220714 (the fixed file is gone
in next-20220715) and tested with i386, ppc, and mips compilers.
The problem is no longer seen after this patch is applied.

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> index 056cb8599d6d..28f2b8f88818 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_block_height(struct kunit *test)
>   	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, drm_format_info_block_height(info, -1));
>   }
>   
> -static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane(struct kunit *test)
>   {
>   	const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>   
> @@ -175,6 +175,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
>   			(uint64_t)UINT_MAX * 4);
>   	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 0, (UINT_MAX - 1)),
>   			(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) * 4);
> +}
> +
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>   
>   	/* Test 2 planes format */
>   	info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_NV12);
> @@ -249,6 +254,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
>   			(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
>   	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 2, (UINT_MAX - 1) / 2),
>   			(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
> +}
> +
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>   
>   	/* Test tiled format */
>   	info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_X0L2);
> @@ -273,7 +283,9 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
>   static struct kunit_case drm_format_tests[] = {
>   	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_width),
>   	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_height),
> -	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format),
>   	{ }
>   };
>   

Re: [PATCH] drm/tests: Split up test cases in igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch

[Maíra Canal]

Hi all,

Friendly ping: is someone available to take this, please?

Best Regards,
- Maíra Canal

On 7/17/22 15:43, Maíra Canal wrote:
> The igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() function had a lot of
> KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls, all of which ended up allocating and initializing
> various test assertion structures on the stack.
> 
> This behavior was producing -Wframe-larger-than warnings on PowerPC, i386,
> and MIPS architectures, such as:
> 
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c: In function 'igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch':
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c:271:1: error: the frame size of
> 3712 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes
> 
> So, the igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() test case was split into three
> smaller functions: one testing single plane formats, one testing multiple
> planes formats, and the other testing tiled formats.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> index 056cb8599d6d..28f2b8f88818 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_block_height(struct kunit *test)
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, drm_format_info_block_height(info, -1));
>  }
>  
> -static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane(struct kunit *test)
>  {
>  	const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>  
> @@ -175,6 +175,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
>  			(uint64_t)UINT_MAX * 4);
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 0, (UINT_MAX - 1)),
>  			(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) * 4);
> +}
> +
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>  
>  	/* Test 2 planes format */
>  	info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_NV12);
> @@ -249,6 +254,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
>  			(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 2, (UINT_MAX - 1) / 2),
>  			(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
> +}
> +
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>  
>  	/* Test tiled format */
>  	info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_X0L2);
> @@ -273,7 +283,9 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
>  static struct kunit_case drm_format_tests[] = {
>  	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_width),
>  	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_height),
> -	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format),
>  	{ }
>  };
>  

Re: [PATCH] drm/tests: Split up test cases in igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch

[André Almeida]

Às 15:43 de 17/07/22, Maíra Canal escreveu:
> The igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() function had a lot of
> KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls, all of which ended up allocating and initializing
> various test assertion structures on the stack.
> 
> This behavior was producing -Wframe-larger-than warnings on PowerPC, i386,
> and MIPS architectures, such as:
> 
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c: In function 'igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch':
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c:271:1: error: the frame size of
> 3712 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes
> 
> So, the igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() test case was split into three
> smaller functions: one testing single plane formats, one testing multiple
> planes formats, and the other testing tiled formats.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
> ---

Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>

>  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> index 056cb8599d6d..28f2b8f88818 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_block_height(struct kunit *test)
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, drm_format_info_block_height(info, -1));
>  }
>  
> -static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane(struct kunit *test)
>  {
>  	const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>  
> @@ -175,6 +175,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
>  			(uint64_t)UINT_MAX * 4);
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 0, (UINT_MAX - 1)),
>  			(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) * 4);
> +}
> +
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes(struct kunit *test)

Minor nit: I think the wording is usually "multi-planar"

> +{
> +	const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>  
>  	/* Test 2 planes format */
>  	info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_NV12);
> @@ -249,6 +254,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
>  			(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 2, (UINT_MAX - 1) / 2),
>  			(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
> +}
> +
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>  
>  	/* Test tiled format */
>  	info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_X0L2);
> @@ -273,7 +283,9 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
>  static struct kunit_case drm_format_tests[] = {
>  	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_width),
>  	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_height),
> -	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format),
>  	{ }
>  };
>  

Re: [PATCH] drm/tests: Split up test cases in igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch

[Melissa Wen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3258 bytes --]

On 07/17, Maíra Canal wrote:
> The igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() function had a lot of
> KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls, all of which ended up allocating and initializing
> various test assertion structures on the stack.
> 
> This behavior was producing -Wframe-larger-than warnings on PowerPC, i386,
> and MIPS architectures, such as:
> 
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c: In function 'igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch':
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c:271:1: error: the frame size of
> 3712 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes
> 
> So, the igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() test case was split into three
> smaller functions: one testing single plane formats, one testing multiple
> planes formats, and the other testing tiled formats.
> 
Hi Maíra,

Could you add a Fixes tag to indicate the commit that introduces the
issue?

Thanks,

Melissa

> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> index 056cb8599d6d..28f2b8f88818 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_block_height(struct kunit *test)
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, drm_format_info_block_height(info, -1));
>  }
>  
> -static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane(struct kunit *test)
>  {
>  	const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>  
> @@ -175,6 +175,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
>  			(uint64_t)UINT_MAX * 4);
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 0, (UINT_MAX - 1)),
>  			(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) * 4);
> +}
> +
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>  
>  	/* Test 2 planes format */
>  	info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_NV12);
> @@ -249,6 +254,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
>  			(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 2, (UINT_MAX - 1) / 2),
>  			(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
> +}
> +
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>  
>  	/* Test tiled format */
>  	info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_X0L2);
> @@ -273,7 +283,9 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
>  static struct kunit_case drm_format_tests[] = {
>  	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_width),
>  	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_height),
> -	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format),
>  	{ }
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.36.1
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]