From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] staging: most: Use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 12:02:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190706100253.GA20497@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190704153803.12739-5-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019@05:38:00PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> For spinlocks the type spinlock_t should be used instead of "struct
> spinlock".
Why?
> Use spinlock_t for spinlock's definition.
Why? I agree it makes the code smaller, but why is this required?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-06 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190704153803.12739-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
2019-07-04 15:38 ` [PATCH 4/7] staging: most: Use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-07-06 10:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2019-07-06 21:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-07-15 19:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-07-04 15:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190706100253.GA20497@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).