driverdev-devel.linuxdriverproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
To: slongerbeam@gmail.com, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
	"mchehab@kernel.org" <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, "kernel@puri.sm" <kernel@puri.sm>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: nxp imx8m CSI drivers
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 11:32:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cbfdb81f-9a09-2ad1-4b51-54e10f678358@puri.sm> (raw)

hi linux-media people,

TL-DR: when exactly is "sd->entity.function == MEDIA_ENT_F_VID_MUX"?


I try to use the camera on our librem5-devkit (imx8mq): I try to use
only mainline drivers except for "mxc-mipi-csi2_yav" taken from
linux-imx (which we can prepare to submit if a PoC works. This is the
tree I'm experimenting with:

https://source.puri.sm/martin.kepplinger/linux-next/-/commits/5.8-rc4/librem5___csi

* "imx7-media-csi" / imx-media-capture / imx-media-utils currently in
staging (that should work according to NXP)
* ov5640 mainline driver
* mxc-mipi-csi2_yav from NXP tree (linux-imx) with
v4l2_subdev_video_ops' mipi_csis_g_parm and mipi_csis_s_parm callbacks
removed (due to missing API in mainline)

the drivers probe and run but the following fails when trying to use the
camera (gstreamer):

in imx-media-utils' imx_media_pipeline_set_stream() the call to
v4l2_subdev_call(sd, video, s_stream, 1) returns with 32 (broken pipe)
and thus the application that tries to use the camera too.

One problem is definitely the trees' last commit (that I did as a
workaround) in this tree that makes the drivers probe but only by
ignoring this probably needed check:

imx7-media-csi's imx7_csi_notify_bound() callback implementation gets
called during startup. But if (WARN_ON(sd->entity.function !=
MEDIA_ENT_F_VID_MUX)) is true so this is the wrong type of subdev (?).

I just want to put this out there and check if the general approach is
valid at all and if there's anything that comes to your mind.

thanks a lot,
                              martin
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2020-07-09  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-09  9:32 Martin Kepplinger [this message]
2020-07-28 10:36 ` nxp imx8m CSI drivers Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-29  0:44   ` Laurent Pinchart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cbfdb81f-9a09-2ad1-4b51-54e10f678358@puri.sm \
    --to=martin.kepplinger@puri.sm \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kernel@puri.sm \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=slongerbeam@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).