Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: net: add new property st,ext-phyclk in documentation for stm32

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Christophe ROULLIER <christophe.roullier@foss.st.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: net: add new property st,ext-phyclk in documentation for stm32
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:06:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2a98098-8ccd-4b8f-9a4b-1cbc0776a9c2@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50ee6122-b160-48ea-8c44-1046b5907d7c@foss.st.com>

On 13/03/2024 11:39, Christophe ROULLIER wrote:
> 
> On 3/8/24 09:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 07/03/2024 14:59, Christophe Roullier wrote:
>>> Add property st,ext-phyclk to manage cases when PHY have no cristal/quartz
>>> This property can be used with RMII phy without cristal 50Mhz and when we
>>> want to select RCC clock instead of ETH_REF_CLK
>>> Can be used also with RGMII phy with no cristal and we select RCC clock
>>> instead of ETH_CLK125
>>>
>> Nothing improved here. You say you add new property (wrote it explicitly
>> in the subject), but where is it? Where is the user?
>>
>> I think we talked about this. Rob also asked quite clear:
>>
>>> That is obvious from the diff. What is not obvious is why we need a new
>>> property and what is the problem with the existing ones.
>> How did you solve it?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I do not understand your questions.

OK, I will clarify some questions, but are you sure that this question:
"How did you solve it?"
needs clarification?

If so, then let me clarify:
Rob pointed issue. How did you resolve Rob's comment? How did you
address it? What changed in your patch, that Rob's comment should be
considered as addressed/resolved/done?

Now about my other question:
"but where is it? Where is the user?"

Your subject and commit message claim you add new property. This means
such property was not existing so far in the Linux kernel. If you add
new property in the binding, then I expect adding the user of that
binding, thus my question: where is the user of that binding?

> 
> That I would like to do, it is property "st,ext-phyclk" was introduced 
> in driver
> 
> "drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-stm32.c" in 2020, and YAML 
> was not updated at the time.

Are you saying you document existing property or add a new one?

> 
> Goal of this patch it is to update YAML to avoid dtbs check issue if 
> someone use this property :
> 
>   dtbs check issue : views/kernel/upstream/net-next/arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp157c-dk2.dtb:
> ethernet@5800a000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed
> ('st,ext-phyclk' was unexpected)

So DTS uses it?

Are my questions now clear? BTW, I asked some of them before and you
just sent the same patch, so looks like ignored my questions.

Best regards,
Krzysztof