All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
	Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Eric Pilmore <epilmore@gigaio.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Support transactions that hit the host bridge
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 18:31:07 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e31f13f8-5afd-6f38-a206-163e9f77c91a@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190806234439.GW151852@google.com>



On 2019-08-06 5:44 p.m., Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:35:31AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> Here's v2 of the patchset. It doesn't sound like there's anything
>> terribly controversial here so this version is mostly just some
>> cleanup changes for clarity.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>>  * Rebase on v5.3-rc2 (No changes)
>>  * Re-introduce the private pagemap structure and move the p2p-specific
>>    elements out of the commond dev_pagemap (per Christoph)
>>  * Use flags instead of bool in the whitelist (per Jason)
>>  * Only store the mapping type in the xarray (instead of the distance
>>    with flags) such that a function can return the mapping method
>>    with a switch statement to decide how to map. (per Christoph)
>>  * Drop find_parent_pci_dev() on the fast path and rely on the fact
>>    that the struct device passed to the mapping functions *must* be
>>    a PCI device and convert it directly. (per suggestions from
>>    Christoph and Jason)
>>  * Collected Christian's Reviewed-by's
>> --
>>
>> As discussed on the list previously, in order to fully support the
>> whitelist Christian added with the IOMMU, we must ensure that we
>> map any buffer going through the IOMMU with an aprropriate dma_map
>> call. This patchset accomplishes this by cleaning up the output of
>> upstream_bridge_distance() to better indicate the mapping requirements,
>> caching these requirements in an xarray, then looking them up at map
>> time and applying the appropriate mapping method.
>>
>> After this patchset, it's possible to use the NVMe-of P2P support to
>> transfer between devices without a switch on the whitelisted root
>> complexes. A couple Intel device I have tested this on have also
>> been added to the white list.
>>
>> Most of the changes are contained within the p2pdma.c, but there are
>> a few minor touches to other subsystems, mostly to add support
>> to call an unmap function.
>>
>> The final patch in this series demonstrates a possible
>> pci_p2pdma_map_resource() function that I expect Christian will need
>> but does not have any users at this time so I don't intend for it to be
>> considered for merging.
> 
> I don't see pci_p2pdma_map_resource() in any of these patches.

Oh, sorry, I removed that in v2 seeing there was some confusion over it.
I guess I forgot to remove the reference in the cover letter.

> I tentatively applied these to pci/p2pdma with minor typographical
> updates (below), but I'll update the branch if necessary.

Great, thanks! The typographical changes look good.

I already have one very minor change queued up for these. Should I just
send you a small patch against your branch for you to squash?

Logan


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: logang@deltatee.com (Logan Gunthorpe)
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Support transactions that hit the host bridge
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 18:31:07 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e31f13f8-5afd-6f38-a206-163e9f77c91a@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190806234439.GW151852@google.com>



On 2019-08-06 5:44 p.m., Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019@10:35:31AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> Here's v2 of the patchset. It doesn't sound like there's anything
>> terribly controversial here so this version is mostly just some
>> cleanup changes for clarity.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>>  * Rebase on v5.3-rc2 (No changes)
>>  * Re-introduce the private pagemap structure and move the p2p-specific
>>    elements out of the commond dev_pagemap (per Christoph)
>>  * Use flags instead of bool in the whitelist (per Jason)
>>  * Only store the mapping type in the xarray (instead of the distance
>>    with flags) such that a function can return the mapping method
>>    with a switch statement to decide how to map. (per Christoph)
>>  * Drop find_parent_pci_dev() on the fast path and rely on the fact
>>    that the struct device passed to the mapping functions *must* be
>>    a PCI device and convert it directly. (per suggestions from
>>    Christoph and Jason)
>>  * Collected Christian's Reviewed-by's
>> --
>>
>> As discussed on the list previously, in order to fully support the
>> whitelist Christian added with the IOMMU, we must ensure that we
>> map any buffer going through the IOMMU with an aprropriate dma_map
>> call. This patchset accomplishes this by cleaning up the output of
>> upstream_bridge_distance() to better indicate the mapping requirements,
>> caching these requirements in an xarray, then looking them up at map
>> time and applying the appropriate mapping method.
>>
>> After this patchset, it's possible to use the NVMe-of P2P support to
>> transfer between devices without a switch on the whitelisted root
>> complexes. A couple Intel device I have tested this on have also
>> been added to the white list.
>>
>> Most of the changes are contained within the p2pdma.c, but there are
>> a few minor touches to other subsystems, mostly to add support
>> to call an unmap function.
>>
>> The final patch in this series demonstrates a possible
>> pci_p2pdma_map_resource() function that I expect Christian will need
>> but does not have any users at this time so I don't intend for it to be
>> considered for merging.
> 
> I don't see pci_p2pdma_map_resource() in any of these patches.

Oh, sorry, I removed that in v2 seeing there was some confusion over it.
I guess I forgot to remove the reference in the cover letter.

> I tentatively applied these to pci/p2pdma with minor typographical
> updates (below), but I'll update the branch if necessary.

Great, thanks! The typographical changes look good.

I already have one very minor change queued up for these. Should I just
send you a small patch against your branch for you to squash?

Logan

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-07  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-30 16:35 [PATCH v2 00/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Support transactions that hit the host bridge Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Introduce private pagemap structure Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Add the provider's pci_dev to the pci_p2pdma_pagemap struct Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Add constants for not-supported result upstream_bridge_distance() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-07  5:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07  5:54     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 15:58     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-07 15:58       ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-08  7:31       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08  7:31         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08 15:58         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-08 15:58           ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Factor out __upstream_bridge_distance() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Apply host bridge white list for ACS Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Factor out host_bridge_whitelist() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Add whitelist support for Intel Host Bridges Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Add attrs argument to pci_p2pdma_map_sg() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Introduce pci_p2pdma_unmap_sg() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Factor out __pci_p2pdma_map_sg() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Store mapping method in an xarray Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-07  5:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07  5:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] PCI/P2PDMA: dma_map P2PDMA map requests that traverse the host bridge Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] PCI/P2PDMA: No longer require no-mmu for host bridge whitelist Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-07  5:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07  5:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 12:43     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-07 12:43       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08  7:29       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08  7:29         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Update documentation for pci_p2pdma_distance_many() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-06 23:44 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Support transactions that hit the host bridge Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-06 23:44   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-07  0:31   ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-08-07  0:31     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-07 19:29     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-07 19:29       ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e31f13f8-5afd-6f38-a206-163e9f77c91a@deltatee.com \
    --to=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=Christian.Koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=epilmore@gigaio.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.