From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, drjones@redhat.com,
eric.auger@redhat.com, aarcange@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv2 3/9] kvm/arm64: Rename kvm_vcpu_get_hsr() to kvm_vcpu_get_esr()
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 16:34:05 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e71af813-7f72-9d2e-2419-f4e03cf35369@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <359dad5546a428ea963781f2728e70bf@kernel.org>
On 5/27/20 5:20 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-05-27 03:43, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> On 5/26/20 8:42 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 01:29:13PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>>> Since kvm/arm32 was removed, this renames kvm_vcpu_get_hsr() to
>>>> kvm_vcpu_get_esr() to it a bit more self-explaining because the
>>>> functions returns ESR instead of HSR on aarch64. This shouldn't
>>>> cause any functional changes.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> I think that this would be a nice cleanup on its own, and could be taken
>>> independently of the rest of this series if it were rebased and sent as
>>> a single patch.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, I'll see how PATCH[3,4,5] can be posted independently
>> as part of the preparatory work, which is suggested by you
>> in another reply.
>>
>> By the way, I assume the cleanup patches are good enough to
>> target 5.8.rc1/rc2 if you agree.
>
> It's fine to base them on -rc1 or -rc2. They will not be merged
> before 5.9 though.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
Sure, Thanks, Marc!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
shan.gavin@gmail.com, will@kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv2 3/9] kvm/arm64: Rename kvm_vcpu_get_hsr() to kvm_vcpu_get_esr()
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 16:34:05 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e71af813-7f72-9d2e-2419-f4e03cf35369@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <359dad5546a428ea963781f2728e70bf@kernel.org>
On 5/27/20 5:20 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-05-27 03:43, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> On 5/26/20 8:42 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 01:29:13PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>>> Since kvm/arm32 was removed, this renames kvm_vcpu_get_hsr() to
>>>> kvm_vcpu_get_esr() to it a bit more self-explaining because the
>>>> functions returns ESR instead of HSR on aarch64. This shouldn't
>>>> cause any functional changes.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> I think that this would be a nice cleanup on its own, and could be taken
>>> independently of the rest of this series if it were rebased and sent as
>>> a single patch.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, I'll see how PATCH[3,4,5] can be posted independently
>> as part of the preparatory work, which is suggested by you
>> in another reply.
>>
>> By the way, I assume the cleanup patches are good enough to
>> target 5.8.rc1/rc2 if you agree.
>
> It's fine to base them on -rc1 or -rc2. They will not be merged
> before 5.9 though.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
Sure, Thanks, Marc!
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
aarcange@redhat.com, drjones@redhat.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eric.auger@redhat.com, james.morse@arm.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com,
will@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv2 3/9] kvm/arm64: Rename kvm_vcpu_get_hsr() to kvm_vcpu_get_esr()
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 16:34:05 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e71af813-7f72-9d2e-2419-f4e03cf35369@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <359dad5546a428ea963781f2728e70bf@kernel.org>
On 5/27/20 5:20 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-05-27 03:43, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> On 5/26/20 8:42 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 01:29:13PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>>> Since kvm/arm32 was removed, this renames kvm_vcpu_get_hsr() to
>>>> kvm_vcpu_get_esr() to it a bit more self-explaining because the
>>>> functions returns ESR instead of HSR on aarch64. This shouldn't
>>>> cause any functional changes.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> I think that this would be a nice cleanup on its own, and could be taken
>>> independently of the rest of this series if it were rebased and sent as
>>> a single patch.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, I'll see how PATCH[3,4,5] can be posted independently
>> as part of the preparatory work, which is suggested by you
>> in another reply.
>>
>> By the way, I assume the cleanup patches are good enough to
>> target 5.8.rc1/rc2 if you agree.
>
> It's fine to base them on -rc1 or -rc2. They will not be merged
> before 5.9 though.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
Sure, Thanks, Marc!
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-28 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-08 3:29 [PATCH RFCv2 0/9] kvm/arm64: Support Async Page Fault Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 1/9] arm64: Probe for the presence of KVM hypervisor services during boot Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 2/9] arm/arm64: KVM: Advertise KVM UID to guests via SMCCC Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 3/9] kvm/arm64: Rename kvm_vcpu_get_hsr() to kvm_vcpu_get_esr() Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-26 10:42 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-26 10:42 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-26 10:42 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-27 2:43 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27 2:43 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27 2:43 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27 7:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-27 7:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-27 7:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-28 6:34 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2020-05-28 6:34 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-28 6:34 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 4/9] kvm/arm64: Detach ESR operator from vCPU struct Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-26 10:51 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-26 10:51 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-26 10:51 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-27 2:55 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27 2:55 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27 2:55 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 5/9] kvm/arm64: Replace hsr with esr Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-26 10:45 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-26 10:45 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-26 10:45 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-27 2:56 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27 2:56 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27 2:56 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 6/9] kvm/arm64: Export kvm_handle_user_mem_abort() with prefault mode Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-26 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-26 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-26 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-27 3:01 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27 3:01 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27 3:01 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 7/9] kvm/arm64: Support async page fault Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-26 12:34 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-26 12:34 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-26 12:34 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-27 4:05 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27 4:05 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27 4:05 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27 7:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-27 7:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-27 7:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-28 6:32 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-28 6:32 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-28 6:32 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 8/9] kernel/sched: Add cpu_rq_is_locked() Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 9/9] arm64: Support async page fault Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08 3:29 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-26 12:56 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-26 12:56 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-26 12:56 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-27 6:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-27 6:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-27 6:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-28 6:14 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-28 6:14 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-28 6:14 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-28 7:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-28 7:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-28 7:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-28 10:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-28 10:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-28 10:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-28 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-28 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-28 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-28 23:02 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-28 23:02 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-28 23:02 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-29 9:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-29 9:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-29 9:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-29 11:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-29 11:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-29 11:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-31 12:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-31 12:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-31 12:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-01 9:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-01 9:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-01 9:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-02 5:44 ` Gavin Shan
2020-06-02 5:44 ` Gavin Shan
2020-06-02 5:44 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-25 23:39 ` [PATCH RFCv2 0/9] kvm/arm64: Support Async Page Fault Gavin Shan
2020-05-25 23:39 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-25 23:39 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-26 13:09 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-26 13:09 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-26 13:09 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-27 2:39 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27 2:39 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27 2:39 ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27 7:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-27 7:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-27 7:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-27 16:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-27 16:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-27 16:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e71af813-7f72-9d2e-2419-f4e03cf35369@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.