From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
rkrcmar@redhat.com, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
gary.hook@amd.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, hpa@zytor.com,
cl@linux.com, tglx@linutronix.de, aarcange@redhat.com,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, mchehab@kernel.org,
simon.guinot@sequanux.org, bhe@redhat.com, xemul@parallels.com,
joro@8bytes.org, x86@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
piotr.luc@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, msalter@redhat.com,
ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, dyoung@redhat.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, jroedel@suse.de, keescook@chromium.org,
arnd@arndb.de, toshi.kani@hpe.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, luto@kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, labbott@fedo.osuosl.org,
devel@linuxdriverproject.org, iamjoonsoo.kim
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 14/32] x86: mm: Provide support to use memblock when spliting large pages
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 23:25:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec134379-6a48-905c-26e4-f6f2738814dc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170316182836.tyvxoeq56thtc4pd@pd.tnic>
On 16/03/2017 19:28, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> So how hard would it be if the hypervisor allocated that memory for the
> guest instead? It would allocate it decrypted and guest would need to
> access it decrypted too. All in preparation for SEV-ES which will need a
> block of unencrypted memory for the guest anyway...
The kvmclock memory is initially zero so there is no need for the
hypervisor to allocate anything; the point of these patches is just to
access the data in a natural way from Linux source code.
I also don't really like the patch as is (plus it fails modpost), but
IMO reusing __change_page_attr and __split_large_page is the right thing
to do.
Paolo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: simon.guinot@sequanux.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, rkrcmar@redhat.com,
matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, gary.hook@amd.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, hpa@zytor.com, cl@linux.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, bhe@redhat.com, xemul@parallels.com,
joro@8bytes.org, x86@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
piotr.luc@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, msalter@redhat.com,
ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, dyoung@redhat.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, jroedel@suse.de, keescook@chromium.org,
arnd@arndb.de, toshi.kani@hpe.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, luto@kernel.org,
devel@linuxdriverproject.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mchehab@kernel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
labbott@fedo
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 14/32] x86: mm: Provide support to use memblock when spliting large pages
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 23:25:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec134379-6a48-905c-26e4-f6f2738814dc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170316182836.tyvxoeq56thtc4pd@pd.tnic>
On 16/03/2017 19:28, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> So how hard would it be if the hypervisor allocated that memory for the
> guest instead? It would allocate it decrypted and guest would need to
> access it decrypted too. All in preparation for SEV-ES which will need a
> block of unencrypted memory for the guest anyway...
The kvmclock memory is initially zero so there is no need for the
hypervisor to allocate anything; the point of these patches is just to
access the data in a natural way from Linux source code.
I also don't really like the patch as is (plus it fails modpost), but
IMO reusing __change_page_attr and __split_large_page is the right thing
to do.
Paolo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: simon.guinot@sequanux.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, rkrcmar@redhat.com,
matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, gary.hook@amd.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, hpa@zytor.com, cl@linux.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, bhe@redhat.com, xemul@parallels.com,
joro@8bytes.org, x86@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
piotr.luc@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, msalter@redhat.com,
ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, dyoung@redhat.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, jroedel@suse.de, keescook@chromium.org,
arnd@arndb.de, toshi.kani@hpe.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, luto@kernel.org,
devel@linuxdriverproject.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mchehab@kernel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
labbott@fedo.kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 14/32] x86: mm: Provide support to use memblock when spliting large pages
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 23:25:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec134379-6a48-905c-26e4-f6f2738814dc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170316182836.tyvxoeq56thtc4pd@pd.tnic>
On 16/03/2017 19:28, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> So how hard would it be if the hypervisor allocated that memory for the
> guest instead? It would allocate it decrypted and guest would need to
> access it decrypted too. All in preparation for SEV-ES which will need a
> block of unencrypted memory for the guest anyway...
The kvmclock memory is initially zero so there is no need for the
hypervisor to allocate anything; the point of these patches is just to
access the data in a natural way from Linux source code.
I also don't really like the patch as is (plus it fails modpost), but
IMO reusing __change_page_attr and __split_large_page is the right thing
to do.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-16 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 423+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-02 15:12 [RFC PATCH v2 00/32] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/32] x86: Add the Secure Encrypted Virtualization CPU feature Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 16:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-03 16:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-03 16:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-03 21:01 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 21:01 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 21:01 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 21:01 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-04 10:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-04 10:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-04 10:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-06 18:11 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-06 18:11 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-06 18:11 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-06 18:11 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-06 20:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-06 20:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-06 20:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/32] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 11:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-07 11:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-07 11:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-08 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-08 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-08 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/32] KVM: SVM: prepare for new bit definition in nested_ctl Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/32] KVM: SVM: Add SEV feature definitions to KVM Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 0:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-07 0:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-07 0:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/32] x86: Use encrypted access of BOOT related data with SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 11:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-07 11:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-07 11:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 19:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 19:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 19:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 19:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-02 15:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/32] x86/pci: Use memremap when walking setup data Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 20:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-03 20:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-03 20:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-03 21:15 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-03 21:15 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-03 21:15 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-03 21:15 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-07 0:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-07 0:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-07 0:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-13 20:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-13 20:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-13 20:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-13 20:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-02 15:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/32] x86/efi: Access EFI data as encrypted when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 11:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-07 11:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-07 11:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-07 11:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/32] x86: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory page Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 14:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-07 14:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-07 14:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 20:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 20:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 20:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 20:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-17 14:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-17 14:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-17 14:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-17 14:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-17 14:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-17 14:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-17 14:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-02 15:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/32] x86: Change early_ioremap to early_memremap for BOOT data Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-08 8:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-08 8:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-08 8:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/32] x86: DMA support for SEV memory encryption Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:14 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:14 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:14 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-08 10:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-08 10:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-08 10:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:14 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/32] x86: Unroll string I/O when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:14 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:14 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:14 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:14 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/32] x86: Add early boot support when running with SEV active Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:14 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:14 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:14 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-09 14:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-09 14:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-09 14:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-09 16:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-09 16:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-09 16:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-09 16:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-09 16:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-09 16:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-10 16:35 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-10 16:35 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-10 16:35 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-10 16:35 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 10:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 10:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 10:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 14:28 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 14:28 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 14:28 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 14:28 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 15:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 15:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 15:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 16:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 16:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 16:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 16:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 16:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 16:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 16:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:14 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/32] KVM: SVM: Enable SEV by setting the SEV_ENABLE CPU feature Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-09 19:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-09 19:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-09 19:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/32] x86: mm: Provide support to use memblock when spliting large pages Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-10 11:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-10 11:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-10 11:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-10 22:41 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-10 22:41 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-10 22:41 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-10 22:41 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 13:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 13:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 18:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 18:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 18:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 22:25 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-03-16 22:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 22:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 10:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-17 10:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-17 10:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-17 10:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 10:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 10:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-17 10:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-17 10:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-17 11:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 11:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 11:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-17 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-17 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-17 14:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 14:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 14:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
[not found] ` <b516a873-029a-b20a-3c43-d8bf4a200cb7-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-18 16:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-18 16:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-18 16:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-18 16:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-06 14:05 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-04-06 14:05 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-04-06 14:05 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-04-06 14:05 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-04-06 17:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-06 17:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-06 17:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-06 17:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-06 18:37 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-04-06 18:37 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-04-06 18:37 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-04-06 18:37 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-04-07 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-07 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-07 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-07 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-07 14:50 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-04-07 14:50 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-04-07 14:50 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-04-07 14:50 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-02 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/32] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute in early boot Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-24 17:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-24 17:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-24 17:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-27 15:07 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-27 15:07 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-27 15:07 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-27 15:07 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/32] x86: kvm: Provide support to create Guest and HV shared per-CPU variables Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 11:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 11:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 11:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-28 18:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-28 18:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-28 18:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-29 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-29 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-29 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-29 15:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-29 15:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-29 15:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/32] x86: kvmclock: Clear encryption attribute when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/32] kvm: svm: Use the hardware provided GPA instead of page walk Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-29 15:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-29 15:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-29 15:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-29 17:08 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-29 17:08 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-29 17:08 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-29 17:08 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/32] crypto: ccp: Introduce the AMD Secure Processor device Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 17:39 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-02 17:39 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-02 19:11 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 19:11 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 19:11 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 13:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-03 13:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-03 13:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-03 13:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-02 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/32] crypto: ccp: Add Platform Security Processor (PSP) interface support Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/32] crypto: ccp: Add Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) " Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/32] kvm: svm: prepare to reserve asid for SEV guest Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/32] kvm: introduce KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_OP ioctl Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 10:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 10:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 10:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-02 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/32] kvm: x86: prepare for SEV guest management API support Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 10:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 10:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_START command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 18:20 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:20 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:20 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:20 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:20 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_FINISH command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV GUEST_STATUS command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV DEBUG_DECRYPT command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 10:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 10:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 18:41 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:41 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:41 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:41 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:41 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-17 11:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 11:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 11:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 11:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 10:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV DEBUG_ENCRYPT command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 11:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 11:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 11:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 18:34 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:34 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:34 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:34 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:34 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 11:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_MEASURE command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/32] x86: kvm: Pin the guest memory when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 10:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 10:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 18:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 18:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-03 20:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/32] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-03 20:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-03 20:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-03 20:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-03 20:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-03 20:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-03 20:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-03 20:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-03 21:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 21:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 21:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 21:15 ` Brijesh Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ec134379-6a48-905c-26e4-f6f2738814dc@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=gary.hook@amd.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=labbott@fedo.osuosl.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=piotr.luc@intel.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=simon.guinot@sequanux.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.