From: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org> To: w@1wt.eu Cc: arnd@arndb.de, falcon@tinylab.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, thomas@t-8ch.de Subject: [PATCH v2 10/13] tools/nolibc: sys_poll: add pure 64bit poll Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 03:58:42 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <f0956ce681eb8abc81c91e6b34174034d5b32c07.1685387484.git.falcon@tinylab.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <cover.1685387484.git.falcon@tinylab.org> It's time to provide 64bit time structs for all platforms, for y2038 is near. ppoll_time64 has been added from v4.20 and the last arch support is at least from v5.0.0 Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org> --- tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h index db648b5b9a1c..ca802627e88f 100644 --- a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h @@ -940,14 +940,21 @@ int pivot_root(const char *new, const char *old) static __attribute__((unused)) int sys_poll(struct pollfd *fds, int nfds, int timeout) { -#if defined(__NR_ppoll) +#if defined(__NR_ppoll) || defined(__NR_ppoll_time64) +#ifdef __NR_ppoll_time64 + const long nr_ppoll = __NR_ppoll_time64; +#elif __SIZEOF_LONG__ == 8 + const long nr_ppoll = __NR_ppoll; +#else +#error No __NR_ppoll_time64 defined, cannot implement time64 sys_poll() +#endif struct timespec t; if (timeout >= 0) { t.tv_sec = timeout / 1000; t.tv_nsec = (timeout % 1000) * 1000000; } - return my_syscall5(__NR_ppoll, fds, nfds, (timeout >= 0) ? &t : NULL, NULL, 0); + return my_syscall5(nr_ppoll, fds, nfds, (timeout >= 0) ? &t : NULL, NULL, 0); #elif defined(__NR_poll) return my_syscall3(__NR_poll, fds, nfds, timeout); #else -- 2.25.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org> To: w@1wt.eu Cc: arnd@arndb.de, falcon@tinylab.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, thomas@t-8ch.de Subject: [PATCH v2 10/13] tools/nolibc: sys_poll: add pure 64bit poll Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 03:58:42 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <f0956ce681eb8abc81c91e6b34174034d5b32c07.1685387484.git.falcon@tinylab.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <cover.1685387484.git.falcon@tinylab.org> It's time to provide 64bit time structs for all platforms, for y2038 is near. ppoll_time64 has been added from v4.20 and the last arch support is at least from v5.0.0 Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org> --- tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h index db648b5b9a1c..ca802627e88f 100644 --- a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h @@ -940,14 +940,21 @@ int pivot_root(const char *new, const char *old) static __attribute__((unused)) int sys_poll(struct pollfd *fds, int nfds, int timeout) { -#if defined(__NR_ppoll) +#if defined(__NR_ppoll) || defined(__NR_ppoll_time64) +#ifdef __NR_ppoll_time64 + const long nr_ppoll = __NR_ppoll_time64; +#elif __SIZEOF_LONG__ == 8 + const long nr_ppoll = __NR_ppoll; +#else +#error No __NR_ppoll_time64 defined, cannot implement time64 sys_poll() +#endif struct timespec t; if (timeout >= 0) { t.tv_sec = timeout / 1000; t.tv_nsec = (timeout % 1000) * 1000000; } - return my_syscall5(__NR_ppoll, fds, nfds, (timeout >= 0) ? &t : NULL, NULL, 0); + return my_syscall5(nr_ppoll, fds, nfds, (timeout >= 0) ? &t : NULL, NULL, 0); #elif defined(__NR_poll) return my_syscall3(__NR_poll, fds, nfds, timeout); #else -- 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-29 19:59 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-05-29 19:45 [PATCH v2 00/13] nolibc: add part2 of support for rv32 Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:45 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:46 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] selftests/nolibc: remove gettimeofday_bad1/2 completely Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:46 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] selftests/nolibc: support two errnos with EXPECT_SYSER2() Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:47 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] selftests/nolibc: waitpid_min: add waitid syscall support Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:49 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] tools/nolibc: add missing nanoseconds support for __NR_statx Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:50 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 21:39 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-29 21:39 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-30 5:21 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-30 5:21 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] tools/nolibc: add more wait status related types Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:51 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] tools/nolibc: add pure 64bit off_t, time_t and blkcnt_t Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:53 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] tools/nolibc: sys_lseek: add pure 64bit lseek Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:54 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-30 8:10 ` Arnd Bergmann 2023-05-30 8:10 ` Arnd Bergmann 2023-05-30 13:54 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-30 13:54 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-07-02 16:28 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-07-02 16:28 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-29 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] tools/nolibc: add pure 64bit time structs Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:56 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] tools/nolibc: sys_select: add pure 64bit select Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:57 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:58 ` Zhangjin Wu [this message] 2023-05-29 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] tools/nolibc: sys_poll: add pure 64bit poll Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] tools/nolibc: sys_gettimeofday: add pure 64bit gettimeofday Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 19:59 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 20:01 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] tools/nolibc: sys_wait4: add waitid syscall support Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 20:01 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 20:03 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] selftests/nolibc: riscv: customize makefile for rv32 Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 20:03 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-06-02 4:06 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-06-02 4:06 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-06-02 10:33 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-06-02 10:33 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-06-02 11:56 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-06-02 11:56 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-30 6:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] nolibc: add part3 of support " Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-30 6:33 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-30 6:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] selftests/nolibc: add new gettimeofday test cases Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-30 6:37 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-30 10:59 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-30 10:59 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-30 11:28 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-30 11:28 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-30 11:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-30 11:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-30 12:05 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-30 12:05 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-30 12:31 ` Andreas Schwab 2023-05-30 12:31 ` Andreas Schwab 2023-05-30 12:35 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-30 12:35 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-30 6:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/nolibc: add sizeof test for the new 64bit data types Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-30 6:42 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-30 9:18 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-30 9:18 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-30 11:17 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-30 11:17 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-06-02 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] nolibc: add part2 of support for rv32 Willy Tarreau 2023-06-02 19:44 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=f0956ce681eb8abc81c91e6b34174034d5b32c07.1685387484.git.falcon@tinylab.org \ --to=falcon@tinylab.org \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=thomas@t-8ch.de \ --cc=w@1wt.eu \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.