All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux-Kernal <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	osandov@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] mq-deadline: add blk-mq adaptation of the deadline IO scheduler
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 08:30:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f26b60aa-b047-d7a3-550d-5270c696e2a1@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C7AD847-C02D-47FF-83B7-F0BB8FBED5F5@linaro.org>

On 02/02/2017 02:19 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> The scheme is clear.  One comment, in case it could make sense and
> avoid more complexity: since put_rq_priv is invoked in two different
> contexts, process or interrupt, I didn't feel so confusing that, when
> put_rq_priv is invoked in the context where the lock cannot be held
> (unless one is willing to pay with irq disabling all the times), the
> lock is not held, while, when invoked in the context where the lock
> can be held, the lock is actually held, or must be taken.

If you grab the same lock from put_rq_priv, yes, you must make it IRQ
disabling in all contexts, and use _irqsave() from put_rq_priv. If it's
just freeing resources, you could potentially wait and do that when
someone else needs them, since that part will come from proces context.
That would need two locks, though.

As I said above, I would not worry about the IRQ disabling lock.

-- 
Jens Axboe

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Kernal <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <osandov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] mq-deadline: add blk-mq adaptation of the deadline IO scheduler
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 08:30:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f26b60aa-b047-d7a3-550d-5270c696e2a1@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C7AD847-C02D-47FF-83B7-F0BB8FBED5F5@linaro.org>

On 02/02/2017 02:19 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> The scheme is clear.  One comment, in case it could make sense and
> avoid more complexity: since put_rq_priv is invoked in two different
> contexts, process or interrupt, I didn't feel so confusing that, when
> put_rq_priv is invoked in the context where the lock cannot be held
> (unless one is willing to pay with irq disabling all the times), the
> lock is not held, while, when invoked in the context where the lock
> can be held, the lock is actually held, or must be taken.

If you grab the same lock from put_rq_priv, yes, you must make it IRQ
disabling in all contexts, and use _irqsave() from put_rq_priv. If it's
just freeing resources, you could potentially wait and do that when
someone else needs them, since that part will come from proces context.
That would need two locks, though.

As I said above, I would not worry about the IRQ disabling lock.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-02 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-17  0:12 [PATCHSET v4] blk-mq-scheduling framework Jens Axboe
2016-12-17  0:12 ` [PATCH 1/8] block: move existing elevator ops to union Jens Axboe
2016-12-17  0:12 ` [PATCH 2/8] blk-mq: make mq_ops a const pointer Jens Axboe
2016-12-17  0:12 ` [PATCH 3/8] block: move rq_ioc() to blk.h Jens Axboe
2016-12-20 10:12   ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-20 10:12     ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-20 15:46     ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-20 22:14       ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-17  0:12 ` [PATCH 4/8] blk-mq: un-export blk_mq_free_hctx_request() Jens Axboe
2016-12-17  0:12 ` [PATCH 5/8] blk-mq: export some helpers we need to the scheduling framework Jens Axboe
2016-12-17  0:12 ` [PATCH 6/8] blk-mq-sched: add framework for MQ capable IO schedulers Jens Axboe
2016-12-20 11:55   ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-20 11:55     ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-20 15:45     ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-21  2:22     ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-22 15:20       ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-22 15:20         ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-22  9:59   ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-22  9:59     ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-22 11:13     ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-22 11:13       ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-17  2:47       ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-17  2:47         ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-17 10:13         ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-17 10:13           ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-17 12:38           ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-17 12:38             ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-23 10:12     ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-23 10:12       ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-17  2:47     ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-17  9:17       ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-17  9:17         ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-17  0:12 ` [PATCH 7/8] mq-deadline: add blk-mq adaptation of the deadline IO scheduler Jens Axboe
2016-12-20  9:34   ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-20  9:34     ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-20 15:46     ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-21 11:59   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-21 11:59     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-21 14:22     ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-22 16:07   ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-22 16:07     ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-17  2:47     ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-17  2:47       ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-22 16:49   ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-22 16:49     ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-17  2:47     ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-20 11:07       ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-20 11:07         ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-20 14:26         ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-20 13:14   ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-20 13:14     ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-20 13:18     ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-20 13:18       ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-20 14:28       ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-20 14:28     ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-01 11:11   ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-01 11:11     ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-02  5:19     ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-02  9:19       ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-02  9:19         ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-02 15:30         ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-02-02 15:30           ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-02 21:15           ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-02 21:15             ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-02 21:32             ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-02 21:32               ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-07 17:27               ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-07 17:27                 ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-01 11:56   ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-01 11:56     ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-02  5:20     ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-16 10:46   ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-16 10:46     ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-16 15:35     ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-16 15:35       ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-17  0:12 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq-sched: allow setting of default " Jens Axboe
2016-12-19 11:32 ` [PATCHSET v4] blk-mq-scheduling framework Paolo Valente
2016-12-19 11:32   ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-19 15:20   ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-19 15:20     ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-19 15:33     ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-19 18:21     ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-19 18:21       ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-19 21:05       ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-19 21:05         ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-22 15:28         ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-22 15:28           ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-17  2:47           ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-17 10:43             ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-17 10:44             ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-17 10:47             ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-17 10:49             ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-17 10:49               ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-18 16:14               ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-18 16:14                 ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-18 16:21                 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-18 16:21                   ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-23 17:04                   ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-23 17:04                     ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-23 17:42                     ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-23 17:42                       ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-25  8:46                       ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-25  8:46                         ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-25 16:13                         ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-25 16:13                           ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-26 14:23                           ` Paolo Valente
2017-01-26 14:23                             ` Paolo Valente
2016-12-22 16:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-22 16:52   ` Omar Sandoval
2016-12-22 16:52     ` Omar Sandoval
2016-12-22 16:57     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-22 16:57       ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-22 17:12       ` Omar Sandoval
2016-12-22 17:39         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-22 17:39           ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f26b60aa-b047-d7a3-550d-5270c696e2a1@fb.com \
    --to=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.