All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:38:54 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f67b5468-2144-c51f-6cf0-ea7ece93b502@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190214211642.2200-1-yuzhao@google.com>



On 02/15/2019 02:46 AM, Yu Zhao wrote:
> Switch from per mm_struct to per pmd page table lock by enabling
> ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK. This provides better granularity for
> large system.
> 
> I'm not sure if there is contention on mm->page_table_lock. Given
> the option comes at no cost (apart from initializing more spin
> locks), why not enable it now.
> 

This has similar changes to what I had posted part of the general page table
page accounting clean up series on arm64 last month.

https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg701954.html
 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:38:54 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f67b5468-2144-c51f-6cf0-ea7ece93b502@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190214211642.2200-1-yuzhao@google.com>



On 02/15/2019 02:46 AM, Yu Zhao wrote:
> Switch from per mm_struct to per pmd page table lock by enabling
> ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK. This provides better granularity for
> large system.
> 
> I'm not sure if there is contention on mm->page_table_lock. Given
> the option comes at no cost (apart from initializing more spin
> locks), why not enable it now.
> 

This has similar changes to what I had posted part of the general page table
page accounting clean up series on arm64 last month.

https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg701954.html
 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-19  3:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-14 21:16 [PATCH] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock Yu Zhao
2019-02-14 21:16 ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-18 15:12 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-18 15:12   ` Will Deacon
2019-02-18 19:49   ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-18 19:49     ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-18 20:48     ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-18 20:48       ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-19  4:09     ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-02-19  4:09       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-02-18 23:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables Yu Zhao
2019-02-18 23:13   ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-18 23:13   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: mm: don't call page table ctors for init_mm Yu Zhao
2019-02-18 23:13     ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-26 15:13     ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-26 15:13       ` Mark Rutland
2019-03-09  3:52       ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-09  3:52         ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-18 23:13   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock Yu Zhao
2019-02-18 23:13     ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-19  4:21   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables Anshuman Khandual
2019-02-19  4:21     ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-02-19  5:32     ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-19  5:32       ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-19  6:17       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-02-19  6:17         ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-02-19 22:28         ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-19 22:28           ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-20 10:27           ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-02-20 10:27             ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-02-20 12:24             ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-20 12:24               ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-20 20:22             ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-20 20:22               ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-20 20:59               ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-20 20:59                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-20 20:59                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-20  1:34         ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-20  1:34           ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-20  1:34           ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-20  3:20           ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-02-20  3:20             ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-02-20 21:03       ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-20 21:03         ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-20 21:03         ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-26 15:12   ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-26 15:12     ` Mark Rutland
2019-03-09  4:01     ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-09  4:01       ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-09  4:01       ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-10  1:19   ` [PATCH v3 " Yu Zhao
2019-03-10  1:19     ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-10  1:19     ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-10  1:19     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: mm: don't call page table ctors for init_mm Yu Zhao
2019-03-10  1:19       ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-10  1:19       ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-10  1:19     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock Yu Zhao
2019-03-10  1:19       ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-10  1:19       ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-11  8:28       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-03-11  8:28         ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-03-11 23:10         ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-11 23:10           ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-11 12:12       ` Mark Rutland
2019-03-11 12:12         ` Mark Rutland
2019-03-11 12:57         ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-03-11 12:57           ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-03-11 23:11         ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-11 23:11           ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-11 23:11           ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-11  7:45     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables Anshuman Khandual
2019-03-11  7:45       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-03-11 23:23       ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-11 23:23         ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  0:57     ` [PATCH v4 1/4] " Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  0:57       ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  0:57       ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  0:57       ` [PATCH v4 2/4] arm64: mm: don't call page table ctors for init_mm Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  0:57         ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  0:57         ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  0:57       ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: mm: call ctor for stage2 pmd page Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  0:57         ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  0:57         ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  2:19         ` [PATCH] KVM: ARM: Remove pgtable page standard functions from stage-2 page tables Anshuman Khandual
2019-03-12  2:19           ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-03-12  2:40           ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  2:40             ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-12 10:37           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-12 10:37             ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-12 11:31             ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-03-12 11:31               ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-03-12 11:43               ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-12 11:43                 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-12 13:25                 ` [PATCH V2] " Anshuman Khandual
2019-03-12 13:25                   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-01 16:16                   ` Will Deacon
2019-04-01 16:16                     ` Will Deacon
2019-04-01 16:16                     ` Will Deacon
2019-04-01 18:34                     ` Yu Zhao
2019-04-01 18:34                       ` Yu Zhao
2019-04-01 18:34                       ` Yu Zhao
2019-04-02  9:03                       ` Will Deacon
2019-04-02  9:03                         ` Will Deacon
2019-04-02  9:03                         ` Will Deacon
2019-04-08 14:22                         ` Will Deacon
2019-04-08 14:22                           ` Will Deacon
2019-04-08 14:22                           ` Will Deacon
2019-04-08 14:22                           ` Will Deacon
2019-04-08 17:18                           ` Yu Zhao
2019-04-08 17:18                             ` Yu Zhao
2019-04-08 17:18                             ` Yu Zhao
2019-04-08  9:09                     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-08  9:09                       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-08  9:09                       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-08  9:09                       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-12  0:57       ` [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  0:57         ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  0:57         ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-19  3:08 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2019-02-19  3:08   ` [PATCH] " Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f67b5468-2144-c51f-6cf0-ea7ece93b502@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.