From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6358: Drop *_sshub regulators
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 18:02:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8188ce3-8c82-0293-6598-53cf0a8dfebf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230609083009.2822259-3-wenst@chromium.org>
On 09/06/2023 10:29, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The *_sshub regulators are actually alternate configuration interfaces
> for their non *_sshub counterparts. They are not separate regulator
> outputs. These registers are intended for the companion processor to
> use to configure the power rails while the main processor is sleeping.
> They are not intended for the main operating system to use.
>
> Since they are not real outputs they shouldn't be modeled separately.
> Remove them. Luckily no device tree actually uses them.
>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6358: Drop *_sshub regulators
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 18:02:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8188ce3-8c82-0293-6598-53cf0a8dfebf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230609083009.2822259-3-wenst@chromium.org>
On 09/06/2023 10:29, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The *_sshub regulators are actually alternate configuration interfaces
> for their non *_sshub counterparts. They are not separate regulator
> outputs. These registers are intended for the companion processor to
> use to configure the power rails while the main processor is sleeping.
> They are not intended for the main operating system to use.
>
> Since they are not real outputs they shouldn't be modeled separately.
> Remove them. Luckily no device tree actually uses them.
>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-09 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-09 8:29 [PATCH 0/9] regulator: mt6358: Remove bogus regulators and improvements Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:29 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:29 ` [PATCH 1/9] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6358: Merge ldo_vcn33_* regulators Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:29 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 15:47 ` Matthias Brugger
2023-06-09 15:47 ` Matthias Brugger
2023-06-09 16:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-06-09 16:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-06-09 8:29 ` [PATCH 2/9] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6358: Drop *_sshub regulators Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:29 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 15:47 ` Matthias Brugger
2023-06-09 15:47 ` Matthias Brugger
2023-06-09 16:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2023-06-09 16:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-06-09 8:30 ` [PATCH 3/9] regulator: mt6358: Merge VCN33_* regulators Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:30 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:58 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-06-09 8:58 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-06-12 3:41 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 15:56 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-09 15:56 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-10 15:28 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-12 4:19 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-12 17:34 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-12 17:34 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-12 10:56 ` Fei Shao
2023-06-15 7:37 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-15 7:37 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:30 ` [PATCH 4/9] regulator: mt6358: Drop *_SSHUB regulators Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:30 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 9:03 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-06-09 9:03 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-06-12 4:45 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-12 18:13 ` Mark Brown
2023-06-12 18:13 ` Mark Brown
2023-06-14 7:39 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-06-14 7:39 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-06-09 15:52 ` Matthias Brugger
2023-06-09 15:52 ` Matthias Brugger
2023-06-09 8:30 ` [PATCH 5/9] regulator: mt6358: Const-ify mt6358_regulator_info data structures Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:30 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:30 ` [PATCH 6/9] regulator: mt6358: Use linear voltage helpers for single range regulators Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:30 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:30 ` [PATCH 7/9] regulator: mt6358: Add output voltage fine tuning to fixed regulators Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:30 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 10:03 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-06-09 10:03 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-06-14 16:14 ` Mark Brown
2023-06-14 16:14 ` Mark Brown
2023-06-15 3:24 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-15 3:24 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:30 ` [PATCH 8/9] regulator: mt6358: Add output voltage fine tuning to variable LDOs Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:30 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 10:03 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-06-09 10:03 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-06-09 8:30 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt6358: Merge ldo_vcn33_* regulators Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-09 8:30 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-06-14 18:58 ` (subset) [PATCH 0/9] regulator: mt6358: Remove bogus regulators and improvements Mark Brown
2023-06-14 18:58 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8188ce3-8c82-0293-6598-53cf0a8dfebf@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.