All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
	"Willian Rampazzo" <willianr@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitlab-ci/cirrus: Increase timeout to 80 minutes
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:03:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc453873-6d33-7289-8227-4dd39ed92beb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZP2esl/18WDQHlQ@redhat.com>

On 16/11/2021 19.20, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 06:36:50PM +0100, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 11/16/21 6:22 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 16/11/2021 18.09, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> On 11/16/21 17:49, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 05:33:09PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>>>> The jobs on Cirrus-CI sometimes get delayed quite a bit, waiting to
>>>>>> be scheduled, so while the build test itself finishes within 60 minutes,
>>>>>> the total run time of the jobs can be longer due to this waiting time.
>>>>>> Thus let's increase the timeout on the gitlab side a little bit, so
>>>>>> that these jobs are not marked as failing just because of the delay.
>>> ...>>> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml
>>>>>> index e7b25e7427..22d42585e4 100644
>>>>>> --- a/.gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml
>>>>>> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml
>>>>>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>>>>>>      stage: build
>>>>>>      image: registry.gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt-ci/cirrus-run:master
>>>>>>      needs: []
>>>>>> +  timeout: 80m
>>>>>>      allow_failure: true
>>>>>>      script:
>>>>>>        - source .gitlab-ci.d/cirrus/$NAME.vars
>>>>>
>>>>> Whether 80 or 100 minute, consider it
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> This pipeline took 1h51m09s:
>>>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/pipelines/409666733/builds
>>>> But Richard restarted unstable jobs, which probably added time
>>>> to the total.
>>>>
>>>> IIRC from a maintainer perspective 1h15 is the upper limit.
>>>> 80m fits, 100m is over.
>>>
>>> I think I agree ... I normally don't want to wait more than a little bit
>>> more than one hour, so 100 minutes feels too long already. We already
>>> have some 70m timeouts in other jobs, and one 80 minute timeout in
>>> .gitlab-ci.d/crossbuild-template.yml, so I'd say 80 minutes are really
>>> the upper boundary that we should use.
>>
>> We are also talking apples and oranges:
>> Gitlab timeouts are on the amount of time the job runs.
>> Cirrus timeouts appear to be on the amount of time the job is queued.
>>
>> If cirrus would just not start accounting until the thing runs we'd be fine.
> 
> Unfortunately it isn't that easy. Our cirrus CI jobs are launched using
> the cirrus-run tool, from a gitlab job. The timeouts we're usually
> hitting are from the gitlab job which is sitting around waiting for
> the cirrus job it launched to finish, so it can report back stats.
> 
> Cirrus CI does itself have a job timeout, but I'm not aware of us
> hitting that typically, unless i'm misinterpreting something.

Right, the problem is the timeout on the gitlab-CI side, not the timeout on 
the Cirrus-CI side. I've never seen us hitting the timeout on the Cirrus 
side either.

  Thomas



  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-17  7:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-16 16:33 [PATCH] gitlab-ci/cirrus: Increase timeout to 80 minutes Thomas Huth
2021-11-16 16:49 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-11-16 17:09   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-11-16 17:22     ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-16 17:36       ` Richard Henderson
2021-11-16 18:20         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-11-17  7:03           ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2021-11-16 17:17 ` Willian Rampazzo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fc453873-6d33-7289-8227-4dd39ed92beb@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
    --cc=willianr@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.