All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@gmail.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	narmstrong@baylibre.com, robert.foss@linaro.org,
	Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, jonas@kwiboo.se,
	jernej.skrabec@gmail.com, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	architt@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: bridge: sii8620: fix possible off-by-one
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:55:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe6fe929-578e-5828-7886-3fe69b9d3a6a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dc52f807-f4bc-13d6-7b9e-81b4fe94a6e0@intel.com>

On 2022/5/18 15:57, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> 
> 
> On 18.05.2022 08:58, Hangyu Hua wrote:
>> The next call to sii8620_burst_get_tx_buf will result in off-by-one
>> When ctx->burst.tx_count + size == ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->burst.tx_buf). The 
>> same
>> thing happens in sii8620_burst_get_rx_buf.
>>
>> This patch also change tx_count and tx_buf to rx_count and rx_buf in
>> sii8620_burst_get_rx_buf. It is unreasonable to check tx_buf's size and
>> use rx_buf.
>>
>> Fixes: e19e9c692f81 ("drm/bridge/sii8620: add support for burst eMSC 
>> transmissions")
>> Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
> 
> Regards
> Andrzej
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/sil-sii8620.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/sil-sii8620.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/sil-sii8620.c
>> index ec7745c31da0..ab0bce4a988c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/sil-sii8620.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/sil-sii8620.c
>> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static void *sii8620_burst_get_tx_buf(struct 
>> sii8620 *ctx, int len)
>>       u8 *buf = &ctx->burst.tx_buf[ctx->burst.tx_count];
>>       int size = len + 2;
>> -    if (ctx->burst.tx_count + size > ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->burst.tx_buf)) {
>> +    if (ctx->burst.tx_count + size >= ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->burst.tx_buf)) {
>>           dev_err(ctx->dev, "TX-BLK buffer exhausted\n");
>>           ctx->error = -EINVAL;
>>           return NULL;
>> @@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ static u8 *sii8620_burst_get_rx_buf(struct sii8620 
>> *ctx, int len)
>>       u8 *buf = &ctx->burst.rx_buf[ctx->burst.rx_count];
>>       int size = len + 1;
>> -    if (ctx->burst.tx_count + size > ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->burst.tx_buf)) {
>> +    if (ctx->burst.rx_count + size >= ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->burst.rx_buf)) {
>>           dev_err(ctx->dev, "RX-BLK buffer exhausted\n");
>>           ctx->error = -EINVAL;
>>           return NULL;
> 

Hi guys,

Another patches for this module that I submitted at the same time as
this one have been merged. Is this patch forgotten to merge?

Thanks,
Hangyu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@gmail.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	narmstrong@baylibre.com, robert.foss@linaro.org,
	Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, jonas@kwiboo.se,
	jernej.skrabec@gmail.com, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	architt@codeaurora.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: bridge: sii8620: fix possible off-by-one
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:55:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe6fe929-578e-5828-7886-3fe69b9d3a6a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dc52f807-f4bc-13d6-7b9e-81b4fe94a6e0@intel.com>

On 2022/5/18 15:57, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> 
> 
> On 18.05.2022 08:58, Hangyu Hua wrote:
>> The next call to sii8620_burst_get_tx_buf will result in off-by-one
>> When ctx->burst.tx_count + size == ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->burst.tx_buf). The 
>> same
>> thing happens in sii8620_burst_get_rx_buf.
>>
>> This patch also change tx_count and tx_buf to rx_count and rx_buf in
>> sii8620_burst_get_rx_buf. It is unreasonable to check tx_buf's size and
>> use rx_buf.
>>
>> Fixes: e19e9c692f81 ("drm/bridge/sii8620: add support for burst eMSC 
>> transmissions")
>> Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
> 
> Regards
> Andrzej
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/sil-sii8620.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/sil-sii8620.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/sil-sii8620.c
>> index ec7745c31da0..ab0bce4a988c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/sil-sii8620.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/sil-sii8620.c
>> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static void *sii8620_burst_get_tx_buf(struct 
>> sii8620 *ctx, int len)
>>       u8 *buf = &ctx->burst.tx_buf[ctx->burst.tx_count];
>>       int size = len + 2;
>> -    if (ctx->burst.tx_count + size > ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->burst.tx_buf)) {
>> +    if (ctx->burst.tx_count + size >= ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->burst.tx_buf)) {
>>           dev_err(ctx->dev, "TX-BLK buffer exhausted\n");
>>           ctx->error = -EINVAL;
>>           return NULL;
>> @@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ static u8 *sii8620_burst_get_rx_buf(struct sii8620 
>> *ctx, int len)
>>       u8 *buf = &ctx->burst.rx_buf[ctx->burst.rx_count];
>>       int size = len + 1;
>> -    if (ctx->burst.tx_count + size > ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->burst.tx_buf)) {
>> +    if (ctx->burst.rx_count + size >= ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->burst.rx_buf)) {
>>           dev_err(ctx->dev, "RX-BLK buffer exhausted\n");
>>           ctx->error = -EINVAL;
>>           return NULL;
> 

Hi guys,

Another patches for this module that I submitted at the same time as
this one have been merged. Is this patch forgotten to merge?

Thanks,
Hangyu

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-23  2:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-18  6:58 [PATCH] drm: bridge: sii8620: fix possible off-by-one Hangyu Hua
2022-05-18  6:58 ` Hangyu Hua
2022-05-18  7:57 ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-05-18  7:57   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-06-23  2:55   ` Hangyu Hua [this message]
2022-06-23  2:55     ` Hangyu Hua
2022-07-04 18:40     ` Robert Foss
2022-07-04 18:40       ` Robert Foss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fe6fe929-578e-5828-7886-3fe69b9d3a6a@gmail.com \
    --to=hbh25y@gmail.com \
    --cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=robert.foss@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.