* [PATCH v2] xfs/191: update mkfs.xfs input results @ 2019-06-13 8:31 Yang Xu 2019-06-16 14:39 ` Eryu Guan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Yang Xu @ 2019-06-13 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: guaneryu, darrick.wong; +Cc: fstests, Yang Xu Currently, on 5.2.0-rc4+ kernel, when I run xfs/191-input-validation with upstream xfsprogs, I get the following errors because mkfs.xfs binary has changed a lot. -------------------------- PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 5.2.0-rc4+ MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sda11 MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/sda11 /mnt/xfstests/scratch pass -n size=2b /dev/sda11 pass -d agsize=8192b /dev/sda11 pass -d agsize=65536s /dev/sda11 pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11 pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 /dev/sda11 pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 /dev/sda11 pass -l su=10b /dev/sda11 fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11 fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 fail -r rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11 -------------------------- "pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11", expect fail, this behavior has been fixed by commit 16adcb88: (mkfs: more sunit/swidth sanity checking). "fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11" "fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11", expect pass, this option has been removed since commit 2cf637c(mkfs: remove logarithm based CLI option). "fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11" "fail -r rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11" works well if we disable reflink, fail if we enable reflink. It fails because reflink was not supported in realtime devices since commit bfa66ec. I change the expected result for compatibility with current xfsprogs and add rtdev test with reflink . Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> --- tests/xfs/191-input-validation | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation index b6658015..9fe72051 100755 --- a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation +++ b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation @@ -112,10 +112,11 @@ do_mkfs_fail -b size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -b size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -b size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -n size=2s $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_fail -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -n size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -n size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_pass -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV + # bad label length do_mkfs_fail -L thisiswaytoolong $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -129,6 +130,8 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=32M $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=1g $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=$((32 * 1024 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d sectsize=512,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d noalign $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -136,7 +139,10 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=0,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d su=4k,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d su=4K,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d su=1b,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -147,8 +153,6 @@ do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d su=8s,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}b $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}s $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}yerk $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=32Mbsdfsdo $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=1GB $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d agcount=1k $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -159,13 +163,10 @@ do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64k,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64m $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_fail -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d su=4097,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64s $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096garabge,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,sunit=64,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -206,6 +207,7 @@ do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=8 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -l su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_pass -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -l sectsize=512,su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -l internal $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -228,7 +230,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l agnum=32 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=0 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=63 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -l su=1 $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_fail -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -l su=10s $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -l su=$((4096*10+1)) $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -l sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -246,7 +247,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l version=0 $SCRATCH_DEV # naming section, should pass do_mkfs_pass -n size=65536 $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_pass -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -n version=2 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -n version=ci $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -n ftype=0 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ do_mkfs_fail -n version=1 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -n version=cid $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=4 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_fail -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV reset_fsimg @@ -273,14 +274,24 @@ do_mkfs_fail -m crc=0,finobt=1 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -m crc=1 -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV +# realtime section, results depend on reflink +$MKFS_XFS_PROG -f -m reflink=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >/dev/null 2>&1 +if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then + do_mkfs_pass -m reflink=0 -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV + do_mkfs_pass -m reflink=0 -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV + do_mkfs_fail -m reflink=1 -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV + do_mkfs_fail -m reflink=1 -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV +else + do_mkfs_pass -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV + do_mkfs_pass -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV +fi + + # realtime section, should pass -do_mkfs_pass -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -r extsize=4k $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -r extsize=1G $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_pass -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -r noalign $SCRATCH_DEV - # realtime section, should fail do_mkfs_fail -r rtdev=$SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -r extsize=256 $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -293,7 +304,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -r size=65536 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -i size=256 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -i size=512 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -i size=2048 $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_pass -i log=10 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -i perblock=2 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -i maxpct=10 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -i maxpct=100 $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -317,6 +327,8 @@ do_mkfs_fail -i align=2 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -i sparse -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -i align=0 -m crc=1 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -i attr=1 -m crc=1 $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_fail -i log=10 $SCRATCH_DEV + status=0 exit -- 2.18.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] xfs/191: update mkfs.xfs input results 2019-06-13 8:31 [PATCH v2] xfs/191: update mkfs.xfs input results Yang Xu @ 2019-06-16 14:39 ` Eryu Guan 2019-06-19 7:39 ` [PATCH v3] " Yang Xu 2019-06-19 7:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Yang Xu 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Eryu Guan @ 2019-06-16 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yang Xu; +Cc: darrick.wong, fstests, linux-xfs [cc xfs list for xfs specific test] On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 04:31:41PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote: > Currently, on 5.2.0-rc4+ kernel, when I run xfs/191-input-validation with upstream xfsprogs, > I get the following errors because mkfs.xfs binary has changed a lot. Lines are too long for commit log, please wrap at column 68. > > -------------------------- > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 5.2.0-rc4+ > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sda11 > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/sda11 /mnt/xfstests/scratch But these quotes don't need to be wrapped. > > pass -n size=2b /dev/sda11 > pass -d agsize=8192b /dev/sda11 > pass -d agsize=65536s /dev/sda11 > pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11 > pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 /dev/sda11 > pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 /dev/sda11 > pass -l su=10b /dev/sda11 > fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11 > fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 > fail -r rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 > fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11 > -------------------------- > > "pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11", expect fail, this behavior has been fixed by commit 16adcb88: > (mkfs: more sunit/swidth sanity checking). > > "fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11" "fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11", expect pass, this option has been removed > since commit 2cf637c(mkfs: remove logarithm based CLI option). > > "fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11" "fail -r rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11" works well if we disable > reflink, fail if we enable reflink. It fails because reflink was not supported in realtime devices > since commit bfa66ec. > > I change the expected result for compatibility with current xfsprogs and add rtdev test with reflink . > > Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> I noticed Darrick provided a Reviewed-by tag, but as Darrick also noted, it'd be good to know what do other xfs maintainers think about this test. > --- > tests/xfs/191-input-validation | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation > index b6658015..9fe72051 100755 > --- a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation > +++ b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation > @@ -112,10 +112,11 @@ do_mkfs_fail -b size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -b size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -b size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -n size=2s $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_fail -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -n size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -n size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV > > +do_mkfs_pass -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV > + > # bad label length > do_mkfs_fail -L thisiswaytoolong $SCRATCH_DEV > > @@ -129,6 +130,8 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=32M $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=1g $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=$((32 * 1024 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d sectsize=512,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d noalign $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -136,7 +139,10 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=0,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d su=4k,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d su=4K,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d su=1b,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -147,8 +153,6 @@ do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d su=8s,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}b $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}s $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}yerk $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=32Mbsdfsdo $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=1GB $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d agcount=1k $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -159,13 +163,10 @@ do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64k,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64m $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_fail -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4097,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64s $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096garabge,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,sunit=64,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -206,6 +207,7 @@ do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -l su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_pass -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -l sectsize=512,su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -l internal $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -228,7 +230,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l agnum=32 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=63 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -l su=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_fail -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -l su=10s $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -l su=$((4096*10+1)) $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -l sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -246,7 +247,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l version=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > > # naming section, should pass > do_mkfs_pass -n size=65536 $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_pass -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -n version=2 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -n version=ci $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -n ftype=0 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ do_mkfs_fail -n version=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -n version=cid $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=4 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_fail -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV > > reset_fsimg > > @@ -273,14 +274,24 @@ do_mkfs_fail -m crc=0,finobt=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -m crc=1 -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > +# realtime section, results depend on reflink > +$MKFS_XFS_PROG -f -m reflink=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >/dev/null 2>&1 _scratch_mkfs_xfs_supported -m reflink=0 >/dev/null 2>&1 This helper doesn't actually create new fs but tests the given param with a dry run. And I think we need _require_scratch_nocheck instead of _require_scratch, as we test mkfs function and do wipefs $SCRATCH_DEV before every test now. Thanks, Eryu > +if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then > + do_mkfs_pass -m reflink=0 -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > + do_mkfs_pass -m reflink=0 -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > + do_mkfs_fail -m reflink=1 -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > + do_mkfs_fail -m reflink=1 -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > +else > + do_mkfs_pass -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > + do_mkfs_pass -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > +fi > + > + > # realtime section, should pass > -do_mkfs_pass -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -r extsize=4k $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -r extsize=1G $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_pass -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -r noalign $SCRATCH_DEV > > - > # realtime section, should fail > do_mkfs_fail -r rtdev=$SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -r extsize=256 $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -293,7 +304,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -r size=65536 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -i size=256 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -i size=512 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -i size=2048 $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_pass -i log=10 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -i perblock=2 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -i maxpct=10 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -i maxpct=100 $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -317,6 +327,8 @@ do_mkfs_fail -i align=2 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -i sparse -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -i align=0 -m crc=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -i attr=1 -m crc=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_fail -i log=10 $SCRATCH_DEV > + > > status=0 > exit > -- > 2.18.1 > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3] xfs/191: update mkfs.xfs input results 2019-06-16 14:39 ` Eryu Guan @ 2019-06-19 7:39 ` Yang Xu 2020-03-25 12:37 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-03-26 5:39 ` Zorro Lang 2019-06-19 7:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Yang Xu 1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Yang Xu @ 2019-06-19 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: guaneryu, darrick.wong; +Cc: fstests, linux-xfs, Yang Xu Currently, on 5.2.0-rc4+ kernel, when I run xfs/191 with upstream xfsprogs, I get the following errors because mkfs.xfs binary has changed a lot. ------------------------- pass -n size=2b /dev/sda11 pass -d agsize=8192b /dev/sda11 pass -d agsize=65536s /dev/sda11 pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11 pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 /dev/sda11 pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 /dev/sda11 pass -l su=10b /dev/sda11 fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11 fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 fail -r rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11 -------------------------- "pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11", expect fail, this behavior has been fixed by commit 16adcb88(mkfs: more sunit/swidth sanity checking). "fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11" "fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11", expect pass, this option has been removed since commit 2cf637c(mkfs: remove logarithm based CLI option). "fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11" "fail -r rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11" works well if we disable reflink, fail if we enable reflink. It fails because reflink was not supported in realtime devices since commit bfa66ec. "b" or "s" suffix without specifying their size has been supported since xfsprogs v4.15.0-rc1. I change the expected result for compatibility with current xfsprogs and add rtdev test with reflink. Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> --- tests/xfs/191-input-validation | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation index b6658015..9f8de500 100755 --- a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation +++ b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation @@ -31,11 +31,10 @@ _cleanup() # Modify as appropriate. _supported_fs xfs _supported_os Linux -_require_scratch +_require_scratch_nocheck _require_xfs_mkfs_validation - rm -f $seqres.full echo silence is golden @@ -112,10 +111,11 @@ do_mkfs_fail -b size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -b size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -b size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -n size=2s $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_fail -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -n size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -n size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_pass -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV + # bad label length do_mkfs_fail -L thisiswaytoolong $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=32M $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=1g $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=$((32 * 1024 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d sectsize=512,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d noalign $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -136,7 +138,10 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=0,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d su=4k,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -d su=4K,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d su=1b,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -147,8 +152,6 @@ do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d su=8s,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}b $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}s $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}yerk $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=32Mbsdfsdo $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=1GB $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d agcount=1k $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -159,13 +162,10 @@ do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64k,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64m $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_fail -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d su=4097,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64s $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096garabge,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,sunit=64,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -d sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=8 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -l su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_pass -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -l sectsize=512,su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -l internal $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -228,7 +229,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l agnum=32 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=0 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=63 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -l su=1 $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_fail -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -l su=10s $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -l su=$((4096*10+1)) $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -l sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -246,7 +246,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l version=0 $SCRATCH_DEV # naming section, should pass do_mkfs_pass -n size=65536 $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_pass -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -n version=2 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -n version=ci $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -n ftype=0 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -257,6 +256,7 @@ do_mkfs_fail -n version=1 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -n version=cid $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=4 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_fail -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV reset_fsimg @@ -273,14 +273,24 @@ do_mkfs_fail -m crc=0,finobt=1 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -m crc=1 -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV +# realtime section, results depend on reflink +_scratch_mkfs_xfs_supported -m reflink=0 >/dev/null 2>&1 +if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then + do_mkfs_pass -m reflink=0 -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV + do_mkfs_pass -m reflink=0 -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV + do_mkfs_fail -m reflink=1 -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV + do_mkfs_fail -m reflink=1 -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV +else + do_mkfs_pass -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV + do_mkfs_pass -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV +fi + + # realtime section, should pass -do_mkfs_pass -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -r extsize=4k $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -r extsize=1G $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_pass -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -r noalign $SCRATCH_DEV - # realtime section, should fail do_mkfs_fail -r rtdev=$SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -r extsize=256 $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -293,7 +303,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -r size=65536 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -i size=256 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -i size=512 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -i size=2048 $SCRATCH_DEV -do_mkfs_pass -i log=10 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -i perblock=2 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -i maxpct=10 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_pass -i maxpct=100 $SCRATCH_DEV @@ -317,6 +326,8 @@ do_mkfs_fail -i align=2 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -i sparse -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -i align=0 -m crc=1 $SCRATCH_DEV do_mkfs_fail -i attr=1 -m crc=1 $SCRATCH_DEV +do_mkfs_fail -i log=10 $SCRATCH_DEV + status=0 exit -- 2.18.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] xfs/191: update mkfs.xfs input results 2019-06-19 7:39 ` [PATCH v3] " Yang Xu @ 2020-03-25 12:37 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-03-26 5:39 ` Zorro Lang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2020-03-25 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yang Xu; +Cc: guaneryu, darrick.wong, fstests, linux-xfs On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 03:39:23PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote: > Currently, on 5.2.0-rc4+ kernel, when I run xfs/191 with upstream > xfsprogs, I get the following errors because mkfs.xfs binary has > changed a lot. Looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> although this will need a rebase on top of: xfs/191-input-validation:Fix issue that the test takes too long which includes a hunk that is also present in this patch. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] xfs/191: update mkfs.xfs input results 2019-06-19 7:39 ` [PATCH v3] " Yang Xu 2020-03-25 12:37 ` Christoph Hellwig @ 2020-03-26 5:39 ` Zorro Lang 2020-03-26 9:11 ` Yang Xu 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Zorro Lang @ 2020-03-26 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yang Xu; +Cc: fstests, linux-xfs On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 03:39:23PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote: > Currently, on 5.2.0-rc4+ kernel, when I run xfs/191 with upstream > xfsprogs, I get the following errors because mkfs.xfs binary has > changed a lot. > > ------------------------- > pass -n size=2b /dev/sda11 > pass -d agsize=8192b /dev/sda11 > pass -d agsize=65536s /dev/sda11 > pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11 > pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 /dev/sda11 > pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 /dev/sda11 > pass -l su=10b /dev/sda11 > fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11 > fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 > fail -r rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 > fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11 > -------------------------- > > "pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11", expect fail, this behavior has been > fixed by commit 16adcb88(mkfs: more sunit/swidth sanity checking). > > "fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11" "fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11", expect pass, > this option has been removed since commit 2cf637c(mkfs: remove > logarithm based CLI option). > > "fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11" "fail -r rtdev=$fsimg > /dev/sda11" works well if we disable reflink, fail if we enable > reflink. It fails because reflink was not supported in realtime > devices since commit bfa66ec. > > "b" or "s" suffix without specifying their size has been supported > since xfsprogs v4.15.0-rc1. > > I change the expected result for compatibility with current xfsprogs > and add rtdev test with reflink. > > Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- I'd suggest to use a loop device to replace SCRATCH_DEV, to avoid some failures caused by different stripe alignment of SCRATCH_DEV (refer to xfs/513). Or we need to think about the stripe alignment in this case. Thanks, Zorro > tests/xfs/191-input-validation | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation > index b6658015..9f8de500 100755 > --- a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation > +++ b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation > @@ -31,11 +31,10 @@ _cleanup() > # Modify as appropriate. > _supported_fs xfs > _supported_os Linux > -_require_scratch > +_require_scratch_nocheck > _require_xfs_mkfs_validation > > > - > rm -f $seqres.full > echo silence is golden > > @@ -112,10 +111,11 @@ do_mkfs_fail -b size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -b size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -b size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -n size=2s $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_fail -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -n size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -n size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV > > +do_mkfs_pass -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV > + > # bad label length > do_mkfs_fail -L thisiswaytoolong $SCRATCH_DEV > > @@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=32M $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=1g $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=$((32 * 1024 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d sectsize=512,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d noalign $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -136,7 +138,10 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=0,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d su=4k,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -d su=4K,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d su=1b,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -147,8 +152,6 @@ do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d su=8s,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}b $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}s $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}yerk $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=32Mbsdfsdo $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=1GB $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d agcount=1k $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -159,13 +162,10 @@ do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64k,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64m $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_fail -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4097,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64s $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096garabge,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,sunit=64,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -d sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -l su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_pass -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -l sectsize=512,su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -l internal $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -228,7 +229,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l agnum=32 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=63 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -l su=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_fail -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -l su=10s $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -l su=$((4096*10+1)) $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -l sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -246,7 +246,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l version=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > > # naming section, should pass > do_mkfs_pass -n size=65536 $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_pass -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -n version=2 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -n version=ci $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -n ftype=0 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -257,6 +256,7 @@ do_mkfs_fail -n version=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -n version=cid $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=4 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_fail -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV > > reset_fsimg > > @@ -273,14 +273,24 @@ do_mkfs_fail -m crc=0,finobt=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -m crc=1 -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > +# realtime section, results depend on reflink > +_scratch_mkfs_xfs_supported -m reflink=0 >/dev/null 2>&1 > +if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then > + do_mkfs_pass -m reflink=0 -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > + do_mkfs_pass -m reflink=0 -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > + do_mkfs_fail -m reflink=1 -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > + do_mkfs_fail -m reflink=1 -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > +else > + do_mkfs_pass -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > + do_mkfs_pass -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > +fi > + > + > # realtime section, should pass > -do_mkfs_pass -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -r extsize=4k $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -r extsize=1G $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_pass -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -r noalign $SCRATCH_DEV > > - > # realtime section, should fail > do_mkfs_fail -r rtdev=$SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -r extsize=256 $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -293,7 +303,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -r size=65536 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -i size=256 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -i size=512 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -i size=2048 $SCRATCH_DEV > -do_mkfs_pass -i log=10 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -i perblock=2 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -i maxpct=10 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_pass -i maxpct=100 $SCRATCH_DEV > @@ -317,6 +326,8 @@ do_mkfs_fail -i align=2 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -i sparse -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -i align=0 -m crc=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > do_mkfs_fail -i attr=1 -m crc=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > +do_mkfs_fail -i log=10 $SCRATCH_DEV > + > > status=0 > exit > -- > 2.18.1 > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] xfs/191: update mkfs.xfs input results 2020-03-26 5:39 ` Zorro Lang @ 2020-03-26 9:11 ` Yang Xu 2020-03-26 13:21 ` Zorro Lang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Yang Xu @ 2020-03-26 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zorro Lang; +Cc: fstests, linux-xfs on 2020/03/26 13:39, Zorro Lang wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 03:39:23PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote: >> Currently, on 5.2.0-rc4+ kernel, when I run xfs/191 with upstream >> xfsprogs, I get the following errors because mkfs.xfs binary has >> changed a lot. >> >> ------------------------- >> pass -n size=2b /dev/sda11 >> pass -d agsize=8192b /dev/sda11 >> pass -d agsize=65536s /dev/sda11 >> pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11 >> pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 /dev/sda11 >> pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 /dev/sda11 >> pass -l su=10b /dev/sda11 >> fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11 >> fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 >> fail -r rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 >> fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11 >> -------------------------- >> >> "pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11", expect fail, this behavior has been >> fixed by commit 16adcb88(mkfs: more sunit/swidth sanity checking). >> >> "fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11" "fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11", expect pass, >> this option has been removed since commit 2cf637c(mkfs: remove >> logarithm based CLI option). >> >> "fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11" "fail -r rtdev=$fsimg >> /dev/sda11" works well if we disable reflink, fail if we enable >> reflink. It fails because reflink was not supported in realtime >> devices since commit bfa66ec. >> >> "b" or "s" suffix without specifying their size has been supported >> since xfsprogs v4.15.0-rc1. >> >> I change the expected result for compatibility with current xfsprogs >> and add rtdev test with reflink. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> >> --- > > I'd suggest to use a loop device to replace SCRATCH_DEV, to avoid some failures > caused by different stripe alignment of SCRATCH_DEV (refer to xfs/513). Or we > need to think about the stripe alignment in this case. I also met stripe size problem with log section in[1], but it failed on mount step. Can you give me a mkfs example and let me understand? [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11393385/ Best Regards Yang Xu > > Thanks, > Zorro > >> tests/xfs/191-input-validation | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation >> index b6658015..9f8de500 100755 >> --- a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation >> +++ b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation >> @@ -31,11 +31,10 @@ _cleanup() >> # Modify as appropriate. >> _supported_fs xfs >> _supported_os Linux >> -_require_scratch >> +_require_scratch_nocheck >> _require_xfs_mkfs_validation >> >> >> - >> rm -f $seqres.full >> echo silence is golden >> >> @@ -112,10 +111,11 @@ do_mkfs_fail -b size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -b size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -b size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -n size=2s $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_fail -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -n size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -n size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV >> >> +do_mkfs_pass -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV >> + >> # bad label length >> do_mkfs_fail -L thisiswaytoolong $SCRATCH_DEV >> >> @@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=32M $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=1g $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=$((32 * 1024 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV >> +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV >> +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d sectsize=512,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d noalign $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -136,7 +138,10 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=0,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> +do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >> +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d su=4k,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d su=4K,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d su=1b,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -147,8 +152,6 @@ do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d su=8s,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}b $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}s $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}yerk $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=32Mbsdfsdo $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=1GB $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d agcount=1k $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -159,13 +162,10 @@ do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64k,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64m $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_fail -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4097,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64s $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096garabge,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,sunit=64,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -l su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV >> +do_mkfs_pass -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -l sectsize=512,su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -l internal $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -228,7 +229,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l agnum=32 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=63 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -l su=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_fail -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -l su=10s $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -l su=$((4096*10+1)) $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -l sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -246,7 +246,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l version=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> >> # naming section, should pass >> do_mkfs_pass -n size=65536 $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_pass -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -n version=2 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -n version=ci $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -n ftype=0 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -257,6 +256,7 @@ do_mkfs_fail -n version=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -n version=cid $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=4 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> +do_mkfs_fail -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV >> >> reset_fsimg >> >> @@ -273,14 +273,24 @@ do_mkfs_fail -m crc=0,finobt=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -m crc=1 -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> >> >> +# realtime section, results depend on reflink >> +_scratch_mkfs_xfs_supported -m reflink=0 >/dev/null 2>&1 >> +if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then >> + do_mkfs_pass -m reflink=0 -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >> + do_mkfs_pass -m reflink=0 -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >> + do_mkfs_fail -m reflink=1 -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >> + do_mkfs_fail -m reflink=1 -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >> +else >> + do_mkfs_pass -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >> + do_mkfs_pass -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >> +fi >> + >> + >> # realtime section, should pass >> -do_mkfs_pass -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -r extsize=4k $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -r extsize=1G $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_pass -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -r noalign $SCRATCH_DEV >> >> - >> # realtime section, should fail >> do_mkfs_fail -r rtdev=$SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -r extsize=256 $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -293,7 +303,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -r size=65536 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -i size=256 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -i size=512 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -i size=2048 $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_pass -i log=10 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -i perblock=2 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -i maxpct=10 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -i maxpct=100 $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -317,6 +326,8 @@ do_mkfs_fail -i align=2 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -i sparse -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -i align=0 -m crc=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -i attr=1 -m crc=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >> +do_mkfs_fail -i log=10 $SCRATCH_DEV >> + >> >> status=0 >> exit >> -- >> 2.18.1 >> >> >> > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] xfs/191: update mkfs.xfs input results 2020-03-26 9:11 ` Yang Xu @ 2020-03-26 13:21 ` Zorro Lang 2020-03-27 1:22 ` Yang Xu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Zorro Lang @ 2020-03-26 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yang Xu; +Cc: fstests, linux-xfs On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 05:11:37PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote: > > on 2020/03/26 13:39, Zorro Lang wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 03:39:23PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote: > > > Currently, on 5.2.0-rc4+ kernel, when I run xfs/191 with upstream > > > xfsprogs, I get the following errors because mkfs.xfs binary has > > > changed a lot. > > > > > > ------------------------- > > > pass -n size=2b /dev/sda11 > > > pass -d agsize=8192b /dev/sda11 > > > pass -d agsize=65536s /dev/sda11 > > > pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11 > > > pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 /dev/sda11 > > > pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 /dev/sda11 > > > pass -l su=10b /dev/sda11 > > > fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11 > > > fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 > > > fail -r rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 > > > fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11 > > > -------------------------- > > > > > > "pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11", expect fail, this behavior has been > > > fixed by commit 16adcb88(mkfs: more sunit/swidth sanity checking). > > > > > > "fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11" "fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11", expect pass, > > > this option has been removed since commit 2cf637c(mkfs: remove > > > logarithm based CLI option). > > > > > > "fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11" "fail -r rtdev=$fsimg > > > /dev/sda11" works well if we disable reflink, fail if we enable > > > reflink. It fails because reflink was not supported in realtime > > > devices since commit bfa66ec. > > > > > > "b" or "s" suffix without specifying their size has been supported > > > since xfsprogs v4.15.0-rc1. > > > > > > I change the expected result for compatibility with current xfsprogs > > > and add rtdev test with reflink. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> > > > --- > > > > I'd suggest to use a loop device to replace SCRATCH_DEV, to avoid some failures > > caused by different stripe alignment of SCRATCH_DEV (refer to xfs/513). Or we > > need to think about the stripe alignment in this case. > I also met stripe size problem with log section in[1], but it failed on > mount step. Can you give me a mkfs example and let me understand? Sure. # mkfs.xfs -f /dev/mapper/xxx-xfstest meta-data=/dev/mapper/xxx-xfstest isize=512 agcount=16, agsize=409600 blks = sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1 = crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=0 = reflink=1 data = bsize=4096 blocks=6553600, imaxpct=25 = sunit=64 swidth=64 blks naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0, ftype=1 log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=5184, version=2 = sectsz=512 sunit=64 blks, lazy-count=1 realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0 # ./check xfs/191-input-validation FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug) PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch /mnt/scratch xfs/191-input-validation 11s ... - output mismatch (see /home/xfstests-zlang/results//xfs/191-input-validation.out.bad) --- tests/xfs/191-input-validation.out 2018-10-24 02:06:10.616609603 -0400 +++ /home/xfstests-zlang/results//xfs/191-input-validation.out.bad 2020-03-26 08:58:47.269671087 -0400 @@ -1,2 +1,11 @@ QA output created by 191-input-validation silence is golden +fail -d agsize=32m /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch +fail -d agsize=32M /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch +fail -d agsize=33554432 /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch +fail -b size=4096 -d agsize=8192b /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch +fail -d agsize=8192b /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch ... (Run 'diff -u /home/xfstests-zlang/tests/xfs/191-input-validation.out /home/xfstests-zlang/results//xfs/191-input-validation.out.bad' to see the entire diff) Ran: xfs/191-input-validation Failures: xfs/191-input-validation Failed 1 of 1 tests # mkfs.xfs -f -d agsize=32m /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch Due to stripe alignment, the internal log size (8192) is too large. Must fit within an allocation group. Usage: mkfs.xfs ... ... All these failures gone after I turn to use /dev/loop0 to be SCRATCH_DEV. # ./check xfs/191-input-validation FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug) PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/loop0 MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/loop0 /mnt/scratch xfs/191-input-validation 11s ... 10s Ran: xfs/191-input-validation Passed all 1 tests Thanks, Zorro > > [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11393385/ > > Best Regards > Yang Xu > > > > Thanks, > > Zorro > > > > > tests/xfs/191-input-validation | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation > > > index b6658015..9f8de500 100755 > > > --- a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation > > > +++ b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation > > > @@ -31,11 +31,10 @@ _cleanup() > > > # Modify as appropriate. > > > _supported_fs xfs > > > _supported_os Linux > > > -_require_scratch > > > +_require_scratch_nocheck > > > _require_xfs_mkfs_validation > > > - > > > rm -f $seqres.full > > > echo silence is golden > > > @@ -112,10 +111,11 @@ do_mkfs_fail -b size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -b size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -b size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -n size=2s $SCRATCH_DEV > > > -do_mkfs_fail -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -n size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -n size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV > > > +do_mkfs_pass -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV > > > + > > > # bad label length > > > do_mkfs_fail -L thisiswaytoolong $SCRATCH_DEV > > > @@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=32M $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=1g $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=$((32 * 1024 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV > > > +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV > > > +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -d sectsize=512,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -d noalign $SCRATCH_DEV > > > @@ -136,7 +138,10 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=0,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > +do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -d su=4k,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -d su=4K,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d su=1b,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > @@ -147,8 +152,6 @@ do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d su=8s,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}b $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}s $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}yerk $SCRATCH_DEV > > > -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV > > > -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=32Mbsdfsdo $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=1GB $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d agcount=1k $SCRATCH_DEV > > > @@ -159,13 +162,10 @@ do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64k,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64m $SCRATCH_DEV > > > -do_mkfs_fail -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4097,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64s $SCRATCH_DEV > > > -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096garabge,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,sunit=64,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -d sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > > > @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=8 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -l su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV > > > +do_mkfs_pass -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -l sectsize=512,su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -l internal $SCRATCH_DEV > > > @@ -228,7 +229,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l agnum=32 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=63 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -l su=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > -do_mkfs_fail -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -l su=10s $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -l su=$((4096*10+1)) $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -l sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV > > > @@ -246,7 +246,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l version=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > # naming section, should pass > > > do_mkfs_pass -n size=65536 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > -do_mkfs_pass -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -n version=2 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -n version=ci $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -n ftype=0 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > @@ -257,6 +256,7 @@ do_mkfs_fail -n version=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -n version=cid $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=4 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > +do_mkfs_fail -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > reset_fsimg > > > @@ -273,14 +273,24 @@ do_mkfs_fail -m crc=0,finobt=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -m crc=1 -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > +# realtime section, results depend on reflink > > > +_scratch_mkfs_xfs_supported -m reflink=0 >/dev/null 2>&1 > > > +if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then > > > + do_mkfs_pass -m reflink=0 -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > > > + do_mkfs_pass -m reflink=0 -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > > > + do_mkfs_fail -m reflink=1 -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > > > + do_mkfs_fail -m reflink=1 -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > > > +else > > > + do_mkfs_pass -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > > > + do_mkfs_pass -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > > > +fi > > > + > > > + > > > # realtime section, should pass > > > -do_mkfs_pass -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -r extsize=4k $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -r extsize=1G $SCRATCH_DEV > > > -do_mkfs_pass -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -r noalign $SCRATCH_DEV > > > - > > > # realtime section, should fail > > > do_mkfs_fail -r rtdev=$SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -r extsize=256 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > @@ -293,7 +303,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -r size=65536 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -i size=256 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -i size=512 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -i size=2048 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > -do_mkfs_pass -i log=10 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -i perblock=2 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -i maxpct=10 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_pass -i maxpct=100 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > @@ -317,6 +326,8 @@ do_mkfs_fail -i align=2 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -i sparse -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -i align=0 -m crc=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > do_mkfs_fail -i attr=1 -m crc=1 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > +do_mkfs_fail -i log=10 $SCRATCH_DEV > > > + > > > status=0 > > > exit > > > -- > > > 2.18.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] xfs/191: update mkfs.xfs input results 2020-03-26 13:21 ` Zorro Lang @ 2020-03-27 1:22 ` Yang Xu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Yang Xu @ 2020-03-27 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zorro Lang; +Cc: fstests, linux-xfs on 2020/03/26 21:21, Zorro Lang wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 05:11:37PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote: >> >> on 2020/03/26 13:39, Zorro Lang wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 03:39:23PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote: >>>> Currently, on 5.2.0-rc4+ kernel, when I run xfs/191 with upstream >>>> xfsprogs, I get the following errors because mkfs.xfs binary has >>>> changed a lot. >>>> >>>> ------------------------- >>>> pass -n size=2b /dev/sda11 >>>> pass -d agsize=8192b /dev/sda11 >>>> pass -d agsize=65536s /dev/sda11 >>>> pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11 >>>> pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 /dev/sda11 >>>> pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 /dev/sda11 >>>> pass -l su=10b /dev/sda11 >>>> fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11 >>>> fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 >>>> fail -r rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 >>>> fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11 >>>> -------------------------- >>>> >>>> "pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11", expect fail, this behavior has been >>>> fixed by commit 16adcb88(mkfs: more sunit/swidth sanity checking). >>>> >>>> "fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11" "fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11", expect pass, >>>> this option has been removed since commit 2cf637c(mkfs: remove >>>> logarithm based CLI option). >>>> >>>> "fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11" "fail -r rtdev=$fsimg >>>> /dev/sda11" works well if we disable reflink, fail if we enable >>>> reflink. It fails because reflink was not supported in realtime >>>> devices since commit bfa66ec. >>>> >>>> "b" or "s" suffix without specifying their size has been supported >>>> since xfsprogs v4.15.0-rc1. >>>> >>>> I change the expected result for compatibility with current xfsprogs >>>> and add rtdev test with reflink. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> >>>> --- >>> >>> I'd suggest to use a loop device to replace SCRATCH_DEV, to avoid some failures >>> caused by different stripe alignment of SCRATCH_DEV (refer to xfs/513). Or we >>> need to think about the stripe alignment in this case. >> I also met stripe size problem with log section in[1], but it failed on >> mount step. Can you give me a mkfs example and let me understand? > > Sure. > > # mkfs.xfs -f /dev/mapper/xxx-xfstest > meta-data=/dev/mapper/xxx-xfstest isize=512 agcount=16, agsize=409600 blks > = sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1 > = crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=0 > = reflink=1 > data = bsize=4096 blocks=6553600, imaxpct=25 > = sunit=64 swidth=64 blks > naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0, ftype=1 > log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=5184, version=2 > = sectsz=512 sunit=64 blks, lazy-count=1 > realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0 > > # ./check xfs/191-input-validation > FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug) > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch /mnt/scratch > > xfs/191-input-validation 11s ... - output mismatch (see /home/xfstests-zlang/results//xfs/191-input-validation.out.bad) > --- tests/xfs/191-input-validation.out 2018-10-24 02:06:10.616609603 -0400 > +++ /home/xfstests-zlang/results//xfs/191-input-validation.out.bad 2020-03-26 08:58:47.269671087 -0400 > @@ -1,2 +1,11 @@ > QA output created by 191-input-validation > silence is golden > +fail -d agsize=32m /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch > +fail -d agsize=32M /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch > +fail -d agsize=33554432 /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch > +fail -b size=4096 -d agsize=8192b /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch > +fail -d agsize=8192b /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch > ... > (Run 'diff -u /home/xfstests-zlang/tests/xfs/191-input-validation.out /home/xfstests-zlang/results//xfs/191-input-validation.out.bad' to see the entire diff) > Ran: xfs/191-input-validation > Failures: xfs/191-input-validation > Failed 1 of 1 tests > > # mkfs.xfs -f -d agsize=32m /dev/mapper/xxx-xfscratch > Due to stripe alignment, the internal log size (8192) is too large. > Must fit within an allocation group. > Usage: mkfs.xfs > ... > ... Thanks. I see. I will send a v4 patch to use loop dev. Thanks for your review. Best Regards Yang Xu > > All these failures gone after I turn to use /dev/loop0 to be SCRATCH_DEV. > # ./check xfs/191-input-validation > FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug) > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/loop0 > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/loop0 /mnt/scratch > > xfs/191-input-validation 11s ... 10s > Ran: xfs/191-input-validation > Passed all 1 tests > > Thanks, > Zorro > >> >> [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11393385/ >> >> Best Regards >> Yang Xu >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Zorro >>> >>>> tests/xfs/191-input-validation | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >>>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation >>>> index b6658015..9f8de500 100755 >>>> --- a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation >>>> +++ b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation >>>> @@ -31,11 +31,10 @@ _cleanup() >>>> # Modify as appropriate. >>>> _supported_fs xfs >>>> _supported_os Linux >>>> -_require_scratch >>>> +_require_scratch_nocheck >>>> _require_xfs_mkfs_validation >>>> - >>>> rm -f $seqres.full >>>> echo silence is golden >>>> @@ -112,10 +111,11 @@ do_mkfs_fail -b size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -b size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -b size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -n size=2s $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> -do_mkfs_fail -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -n size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -n size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> +do_mkfs_pass -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> + >>>> # bad label length >>>> do_mkfs_fail -L thisiswaytoolong $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> @@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=32M $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=1g $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=$((32 * 1024 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -d sectsize=512,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -d noalign $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> @@ -136,7 +138,10 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=0,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> +do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -d su=4k,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -d su=4K,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d su=1b,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> @@ -147,8 +152,6 @@ do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d su=8s,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}b $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}s $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}yerk $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=32Mbsdfsdo $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=1GB $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d agcount=1k $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> @@ -159,13 +162,10 @@ do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64k,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64m $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> -do_mkfs_fail -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4097,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64s $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096garabge,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,sunit=64,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -d sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -l su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> +do_mkfs_pass -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -l sectsize=512,su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -l internal $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> @@ -228,7 +229,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l agnum=32 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=63 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -l su=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> -do_mkfs_fail -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -l su=10s $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -l su=$((4096*10+1)) $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -l sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> @@ -246,7 +246,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l version=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> # naming section, should pass >>>> do_mkfs_pass -n size=65536 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> -do_mkfs_pass -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -n version=2 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -n version=ci $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -n ftype=0 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> @@ -257,6 +256,7 @@ do_mkfs_fail -n version=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -n version=cid $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=4 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> +do_mkfs_fail -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> reset_fsimg >>>> @@ -273,14 +273,24 @@ do_mkfs_fail -m crc=0,finobt=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -m crc=1 -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> +# realtime section, results depend on reflink >>>> +_scratch_mkfs_xfs_supported -m reflink=0 >/dev/null 2>&1 >>>> +if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then >>>> + do_mkfs_pass -m reflink=0 -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> + do_mkfs_pass -m reflink=0 -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> + do_mkfs_fail -m reflink=1 -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> + do_mkfs_fail -m reflink=1 -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> +else >>>> + do_mkfs_pass -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> + do_mkfs_pass -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> +fi >>>> + >>>> + >>>> # realtime section, should pass >>>> -do_mkfs_pass -r rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -r extsize=4k $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -r extsize=1G $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> -do_mkfs_pass -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -r noalign $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> - >>>> # realtime section, should fail >>>> do_mkfs_fail -r rtdev=$SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -r extsize=256 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> @@ -293,7 +303,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -r size=65536 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -i size=256 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -i size=512 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -i size=2048 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> -do_mkfs_pass -i log=10 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -i perblock=2 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -i maxpct=10 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_pass -i maxpct=100 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> @@ -317,6 +326,8 @@ do_mkfs_fail -i align=2 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -i sparse -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -i align=0 -m crc=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> do_mkfs_fail -i attr=1 -m crc=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> +do_mkfs_fail -i log=10 $SCRATCH_DEV >>>> + >>>> status=0 >>>> exit >>>> -- >>>> 2.18.1 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] xfs/191: update mkfs.xfs input results 2019-06-16 14:39 ` Eryu Guan 2019-06-19 7:39 ` [PATCH v3] " Yang Xu @ 2019-06-19 7:58 ` Yang Xu 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Yang Xu @ 2019-06-19 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eryu Guan; +Cc: darrick.wong, fstests, linux-xfs on 2019/06/16 22:39, Eryu Guan wrote: > [cc xfs list for xfs specific test] > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 04:31:41PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote: >> Currently, on 5.2.0-rc4+ kernel, when I run xfs/191-input-validation with upstream xfsprogs, >> I get the following errors because mkfs.xfs binary has changed a lot. > Lines are too long for commit log, please wrap at column 68. > >> -------------------------- >> PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 5.2.0-rc4+ >> MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sda11 >> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/sda11 /mnt/xfstests/scratch > But these quotes don't need to be wrapped. > >> pass -n size=2b /dev/sda11 >> pass -d agsize=8192b /dev/sda11 >> pass -d agsize=65536s /dev/sda11 >> pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11 >> pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 /dev/sda11 >> pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 /dev/sda11 >> pass -l su=10b /dev/sda11 >> fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11 >> fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 >> fail -r rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11 >> fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11 >> -------------------------- >> >> "pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/sda11", expect fail, this behavior has been fixed by commit 16adcb88: >> (mkfs: more sunit/swidth sanity checking). >> >> "fail -n log=15 /dev/sda11" "fail -i log=10 /dev/sda11", expect pass, this option has been removed >> since commit 2cf637c(mkfs: remove logarithm based CLI option). >> >> "fail -r size=65536,rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11" "fail -r rtdev=$fsimg /dev/sda11" works well if we disable >> reflink, fail if we enable reflink. It fails because reflink was not supported in realtime devices >> since commit bfa66ec. >> >> I change the expected result for compatibility with current xfsprogs and add rtdev test with reflink . >> >> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu<xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> > I noticed Darrick provided a Reviewed-by tag, but as Darrick also noted, > it'd be good to know what do other xfs maintainers think about this > test. > Hi Eryu I have sent a v3 patch about your comment. Besides, I also want to know what other xfs maintainers think about this case. keep it or update it? Let's wait for a short time. Thanks Yang Xu >> --- >> tests/xfs/191-input-validation | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation >> index b6658015..9fe72051 100755 >> --- a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation >> +++ b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation >> @@ -112,10 +112,11 @@ do_mkfs_fail -b size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -b size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -b size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -n size=2s $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_fail -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -n size=nfi $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -n size=4096nfi $SCRATCH_DEV >> >> +do_mkfs_pass -n size=2b $SCRATCH_DEV >> + >> # bad label length >> do_mkfs_fail -L thisiswaytoolong $SCRATCH_DEV >> >> @@ -129,6 +130,8 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=32M $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=1g $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=$((32 * 1024 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV >> +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV >> +do_mkfs_pass -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d sectsize=512,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d noalign $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -136,7 +139,10 @@ do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=0,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d sunit=8,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> +do_mkfs_pass -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >> +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> +do_mkfs_pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d su=4k,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -d su=4K,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -d su=1b,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -147,8 +153,6 @@ do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -d su=8s,sw=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}b $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}s $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d size=${fssize}yerk $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=8192b $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=32Mbsdfsdo $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d agsize=1GB $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d agcount=1k $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -159,13 +163,10 @@ do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64k,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d sunit=64,swidth=64m $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_fail -d su=0,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4097,sw=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,noalign $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64s $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096s,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096b,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096garabge,sw=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d su=4096,sw=64,sunit=64,swidth=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -d sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -206,6 +207,7 @@ do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=8 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -l su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV >> +do_mkfs_pass -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -b size=4096 -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -l sectsize=512,su=$((4096*10)) $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -l internal $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -228,7 +230,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l agnum=32 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -l sunit=63 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -l su=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_fail -l su=10b $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -l su=10s $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -l su=$((4096*10+1)) $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -l sectsize=10,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -246,7 +247,6 @@ do_mkfs_fail -l version=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> >> # naming section, should pass >> do_mkfs_pass -n size=65536 $SCRATCH_DEV >> -do_mkfs_pass -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -n version=2 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -n version=ci $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_pass -n ftype=0 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ do_mkfs_fail -n version=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -n version=cid $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=4 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> +do_mkfs_fail -n log=15 $SCRATCH_DEV >> >> reset_fsimg >> >> @@ -273,14 +274,24 @@ do_mkfs_fail -m crc=0,finobt=1 $SCRATCH_DEV >> do_mkfs_fail -m crc=1 -n ftype=0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> >> >> +# realtime section, results depend on reflink >> +$MKFS_XFS_PROG -f -m reflink=0 $SCRATCH_DEV>/dev/null 2>&1 > _scratch_mkfs_xfs_supported -m reflink=0>/dev/null 2>&1 > > This helper doesn't actually create new fs but tests the given param > with a dry run. > > And I think we need _require_scratch_nocheck instead of > _require_scratch, as we test mkfs function and do wipefs $SCRATCH_DEV > before every test now. > > Thanks, > Eryu > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-27 1:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-06-13 8:31 [PATCH v2] xfs/191: update mkfs.xfs input results Yang Xu 2019-06-16 14:39 ` Eryu Guan 2019-06-19 7:39 ` [PATCH v3] " Yang Xu 2020-03-25 12:37 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-03-26 5:39 ` Zorro Lang 2020-03-26 9:11 ` Yang Xu 2020-03-26 13:21 ` Zorro Lang 2020-03-27 1:22 ` Yang Xu 2019-06-19 7:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Yang Xu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).