* Idea: Add a filter option to 'git rebase' @ 2017-01-20 22:28 Philip Oakley 2017-01-20 23:35 ` Thomas Braun 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Philip Oakley @ 2017-01-20 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Git List; +Cc: Johannes Schindelin A recent question on stackoverflow http://stackoverflow.com/questions/41753252/drop-commits-by-commit-message-in-git-rebase sought to remove automatically commits that could be identified by relevant words in the commit message. I had thought that the ubiquitous `git filter-branch` should be able to do this sort of thing. I was wrong. (It was pointed out to me that...) The man page notes that removing a commit via filter-branch does not remove the changes from following commits and directs readers to using `git rebase(1)`. However the rebase command does not have any filter option to allow the automatic population of its TODO list with the appropriate pick/edit/drop/etc. values. It does feel as if a --filter style option would be a useful addition to rebase to complement the filter-branch options once the current conversion from script to code is complete. Is this something that should be put in the 'worth considering' pile? -- Philip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Idea: Add a filter option to 'git rebase' 2017-01-20 22:28 Idea: Add a filter option to 'git rebase' Philip Oakley @ 2017-01-20 23:35 ` Thomas Braun 2017-01-21 23:18 ` Philip Oakley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Thomas Braun @ 2017-01-20 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philip Oakley, Git List; +Cc: Johannes Schindelin Am 20.01.2017 um 23:28 schrieb Philip Oakley: > A recent question on stackoverflow > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/41753252/drop-commits-by-commit-message-in-git-rebase > sought to remove automatically commits that could be identified by > relevant words in the commit message. > > I had thought that the ubiquitous `git filter-branch` should be able to > do this sort of thing. I was wrong. (It was pointed out to me that...) > The man page notes that removing a commit via filter-branch does not > remove the changes from following commits and directs readers to using > `git rebase(1)`. > > However the rebase command does not have any filter option to allow the > automatic population of its TODO list with the appropriate > pick/edit/drop/etc. values. Well you can use an arbitrary shell command as editor, so something like $ GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR="sed -i -re 's/^pick /edit /'" git rebase -i master will change pick to edit of all commits. Maybe that can be mentioned in the man page of rebase? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Idea: Add a filter option to 'git rebase' 2017-01-20 23:35 ` Thomas Braun @ 2017-01-21 23:18 ` Philip Oakley 2017-01-23 11:57 ` Johannes Schindelin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Philip Oakley @ 2017-01-21 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Git List, Thomas Braun; +Cc: Johannes Schindelin From: "Thomas Braun" Friday, January 20, 2017 11:35 PM > Am 20.01.2017 um 23:28 schrieb Philip Oakley: >> A recent question on stackoverflow >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/41753252/drop-commits-by-commit-message-in-git-rebase >> sought to remove automatically commits that could be identified by >> relevant words in the commit message. >> >> I had thought that the ubiquitous `git filter-branch` should be able to >> do this sort of thing. I was wrong. (It was pointed out to me that...) >> The man page notes that removing a commit via filter-branch does not >> remove the changes from following commits and directs readers to using >> `git rebase(1)`. >> >> However the rebase command does not have any filter option to allow the >> automatic population of its TODO list with the appropriate >> pick/edit/drop/etc. values. > > Well you can use an arbitrary shell command as editor, so something like > > $ GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR="sed -i -re 's/^pick /edit /'" git rebase -i master > > will change pick to edit of all commits. > > Maybe that can be mentioned in the man page of rebase? > I had been more thinking of a process that passed single sha1's to the filter on each pass through the rebase list, so that the coding was simpler, plus the --interactive could be used, if required, for final refinement (gitk being handy for that). However, a mention in the man pages would be zero code cost, and could help. -- Philip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Idea: Add a filter option to 'git rebase' 2017-01-21 23:18 ` Philip Oakley @ 2017-01-23 11:57 ` Johannes Schindelin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2017-01-23 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philip Oakley; +Cc: Git List, Thomas Braun Hi, On Sat, 21 Jan 2017, Philip Oakley wrote: > From: "Thomas Braun" Friday, January 20, 2017 11:35 PM > > Am 20.01.2017 um 23:28 schrieb Philip Oakley: > > > A recent question on stackoverflow > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/41753252/drop-commits-by-commit-message-in-git-rebase > > > sought to remove automatically commits that could be identified by > > > relevant words in the commit message. Interesting. As long as those magic words appear in the oneline, I would simply call the command ":%s/^pick.*<magic-word>/#&/". But that is neither scripted nor does it work with magic words elsewhere in the commit message (let alone more sophisticated filtering based on, say, authorship or magic words in the diff's "+" lines). > > > I had thought that the ubiquitous `git filter-branch` should be able > > > to do this sort of thing. I was wrong. (It was pointed out to me > > > that...) The man page notes that removing a commit via filter-branch > > > does not remove the changes from following commits and directs > > > readers to using `git rebase(1)`. Right, filter-branch never cherry-picks patches, but instead complete trees. > > > However the rebase command does not have any filter option to allow > > > the automatic population of its TODO list with the appropriate > > > pick/edit/drop/etc. values. > > > > Well you can use an arbitrary shell command as editor, so something > > like > > > > $ GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR="sed -i -re 's/^pick /edit /'" git rebase -i master > > > > will change pick to edit of all commits. > > > > Maybe that can be mentioned in the man page of rebase? Please note that using a script instead of a command, you can do really sophisticated things including sophisticated re-writing of the edit script as well as calling the GIT_EDITOR in the end to re-establish interactivity. I do exactly that in my Git garden shears [*1*]. > I had been more thinking of a process that passed single sha1's to the > filter on each pass through the rebase list, so that the coding was > simpler, plus the --interactive could be used, if required, for final > refinement (gitk being handy for that). > > However, a mention in the man pages would be zero code cost, and could > help. In the (frustratingly) long run, we will want to add a command-line option that allows overriding the edit script generation, paired with a command-line option that generates the current version of the edit script (in my rebase--helper work that is still under review, the latter option already exists). That way, you have full flexibility and could even generate the entire edit script from scratch, rather than letting rebase -i generate one and then filtering it. Ciao, Johannes Footnote *1*: https://github.com/git-for-windows/build-extra/blob/master/shears.sh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-23 11:57 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-01-20 22:28 Idea: Add a filter option to 'git rebase' Philip Oakley 2017-01-20 23:35 ` Thomas Braun 2017-01-21 23:18 ` Philip Oakley 2017-01-23 11:57 ` Johannes Schindelin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).