From: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-dev@laposte.net>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] Re: New 'stage' command
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 21:34:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090405193448.GB12929@vidovic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94a0d4530904051228m4e57ec90y810dded41f47e443@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 10:28:24PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > I do not think these are good ideas at all, as it just spreads more
> > confusion, not less.
Agreed.
> Do you agree that there's already a lot of confusion? (stage, cache,
> index, etc.)
>
> And do you agree that many git newbies don't use the stage? Actually
> most of them don't even know what it is, and just do "git commit -a".
>
> If so, how do you think these issues should be handled?
Read the documentation? Read tutorials?
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-05 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-05 13:48 [RFC/PATCH 0/2] New 'stage' command Felipe Contreras
2009-04-05 13:48 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/2] git: remote stage Felipe Contreras
2009-04-05 13:48 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/2] Add new 'git stage' script Felipe Contreras
2009-04-05 19:02 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/2] New 'stage' command Junio C Hamano
2009-04-05 19:28 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-04-05 19:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-05 19:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-05 20:41 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-04-05 20:55 ` Jay Soffian
2009-04-05 22:06 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-04-05 19:34 ` Nicolas Sebrecht [this message]
2009-04-05 21:58 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-04-05 22:35 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-04-05 23:06 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-04-05 23:23 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-04-06 9:48 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-04-05 23:17 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-04-05 23:22 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-04-05 23:45 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-04-06 9:37 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-04-06 3:24 ` David Aguilar
2009-04-06 5:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-06 5:53 ` David Aguilar
2009-04-06 6:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-06 13:20 ` David Kågedal
2009-04-06 13:42 ` David Kågedal
2009-04-06 18:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-06 19:13 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-04-06 19:25 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-04-07 10:01 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-04-07 12:45 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-04-06 20:49 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-04-07 0:55 ` Junio C Hamano
[not found] ` <87skkligzb.fsf@krank.kagedal.org>
2009-04-07 1:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-07 8:39 ` Octavio Alvarez
[not found] ` <878wmcj1fs.fsf@krank.kagedal.org>
2009-04-07 15:01 ` Octavio Alvarez
2009-04-07 1:36 ` Stefan Karpinski
2009-04-07 7:38 ` Octavio Alvarez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090405193448.GB12929@vidovic \
--to=nicolas.s-dev@laposte.net \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).