From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] grep: make output consistent with revision syntax
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:59:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170119165958.xtotlvdta7udqllb@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170119150347.3484-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 03:03:45PM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> git-grep(1)'s output is not consistent with git-rev-parse(1) revision syntax.
>
> This means you cannot take "rev:path/to/file.c: foo();" output from git-grep(1)
> and expect "git show rev:path/to/file.c" to work. See the individual patches
> for examples of command-lines that produce invalid output.
I think this is a good goal.
I couldn't immediately think of any cases where your patches would
misbehave, but my initial thought was that the "/" versus ":"
distinction is about whether the initial object is a tree or a commit.
You do still have to special case the root tree (so "v2.9.3:" does not
get any delimiter). I think "ends in a colon" is actually a reasonable
way of determining that.
> This series is an incomplete attempt at solving the issue. I'm not familiar
> enough with the git codebase to propose a better solution. Perhaps someone is
> interested in a proper fix?
Are there cases you know that aren't covered by your patches?
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-19 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-19 15:03 [RFC 0/2] grep: make output consistent with revision syntax Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-01-19 15:03 ` [RFC 1/2] grep: only add delimiter if there isn't one already Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-01-19 18:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-20 13:56 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-01-20 18:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-23 13:15 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-01-24 19:07 ` Jakub Narębski
2017-01-24 20:48 ` Philip Oakley
2017-01-19 15:03 ` [RFC 2/2] grep: use '/' delimiter for paths Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-01-19 18:29 ` Brandon Williams
2017-01-20 14:17 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-01-19 18:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-20 14:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-01-20 14:19 ` Jeff King
2017-01-20 22:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-23 13:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-01-24 17:18 ` Phil Hord
2017-01-19 16:59 ` Jeff King [this message]
2017-01-19 18:26 ` [RFC 0/2] grep: make output consistent with revision syntax Brandon Williams
2017-01-20 14:18 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-01-20 14:32 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170119165958.xtotlvdta7udqllb@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).