git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: "Max Kirillov" <max@max630.net>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, "Jelmer Vernooij" <jelmer@jelmer.uk>,
	"Florian Manschwetus" <manschwetus@cs-software-gmbh.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] http-backend: Treat empty CONTENT_LENGTH as zero
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 22:30:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180911023025.GA7739@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180911022028.GA20518@aiede.svl.corp.google.com>

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 07:20:28PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

> Jeff King wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 02:22:21PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> 
> >> Thanks.  I am wondering if we should go all the way and do
> >>
> >> 	ssize_t val;
> >> 	const char *str = getenv("CONTENT_LENGTH");
> >>
> >> 	if (!str || !*str)
> >> 		return 0;
> >> 	if (!git_parse_ssize_t(str, &val))
> >> 		die(...);
> >> 	return val;
> >>
> >> That would match the RFC, but it seems to make t5510-fetch.sh hang,
> [...]
> >> Do you know why?
> >
> > Yes. :)
> >
> > It's due to this comment in the patch you are replying to:
> >
> > +       if (!str) {
> > +               /*
> > +                * RFC3875 says this must mean "no body", but in practice we
> > +                * receive chunked encodings with no CONTENT_LENGTH. Tell the
> > +                * caller to read until EOF.
> > +                */
> > +               val = -1;
> 
> Ah!  So "in practice" includes "in Apache".  An old discussion[1] on
> Apache's httpd-users list agrees.
> 
> The question then becomes: what does IIS do for zero-length requests?
> Does any other web server fail to support "read until EOF" in general?
> 
> The CGI standard does not cover chunked encoding so we can't lean on
> the standard for advice.  It's not clear to me yet whether this patch
> improves on what's in "master".

I'd note that the case in question (no CONTENT_LENGTH at all) is not
changed between this patch and master. It's only the case of
CONTENT_LENGTH set to an empty string. But I agree that it is not clear
to me whether it is actually improving anything in practice.

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-11  2:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <f12bc1d7-6acb-6ad9-2917-fbb09105f87a@debian.org>
     [not found] ` <20180905202613.GA20473@blodeuwedd>
2018-09-06  6:10   ` CONTENT_LENGTH can no longer be empty Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-06 19:35     ` [PATCH] http-backend: allow empty CONTENT_LENGTH Max Kirillov
2018-09-06 21:54       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-07  3:27         ` Max Kirillov
2018-09-07  3:38           ` Jeff King
2018-09-07  4:20             ` Max Kirillov
2018-09-07  4:59             ` Max Kirillov
2018-09-07  9:49               ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-08  5:41                 ` Max Kirillov
2018-09-09  4:40                 ` Max Kirillov
2018-09-06 22:45       ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-07  3:36       ` [PATCH v2] " Max Kirillov
2018-09-08  0:19         ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-08  5:35           ` Max Kirillov
2018-09-08  5:42           ` [PATCH v3] " Max Kirillov
2018-09-10  5:17             ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-10 20:36               ` Max Kirillov
2018-09-11  4:06                 ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-11 20:33                   ` [PATCH v2] http-backend test: make empty CONTENT_LENGTH test more realistic Max Kirillov
2018-09-09  4:10         ` [PATCH v4] http-backend: allow empty CONTENT_LENGTH Max Kirillov
2018-09-10  5:25           ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-10 13:17             ` Jeff King
2018-09-10 16:37               ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-10 18:46                 ` Jeff King
2018-09-10 20:53             ` [PATCH] http-backend: Treat empty CONTENT_LENGTH as zero Max Kirillov
2018-09-10 21:22               ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-11  1:55                 ` Jeff King
2018-09-11  2:20                   ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-11  2:30                     ` Jeff King [this message]
2018-09-11  1:58               ` Jeff King
2018-09-11  3:42               ` [PATCH] http-backend: treat " Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-11  4:03                 ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-11 18:15                   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-11 18:27                     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-12  5:56                     ` Jeff King
2018-09-12  6:26                       ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-12 16:10                       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-11  4:18                 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-11  4:29                   ` Jonathan Nieder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180911023025.GA7739@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jelmer@jelmer.uk \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=manschwetus@cs-software-gmbh.de \
    --cc=max@max630.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).