From: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2022, #06; Wed, 17)
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:42:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220818224222.3569397-1-jonathantanmy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq7d36s31e.fsf@gitster.g>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> * en/ancestry-path-in-a-range (2022-08-17) 2 commits
> - revision: allow --ancestry-path to take an argument
> - rev-list-options.txt: fix simple typo
>
> "git rev-list --ancestry-path=C A..B" is a natural extension of
> "git rev-list A..B"; instead of choosing a subset of A..B to those
> that have ancestry relationship with A, it lets a subset with
> ancestry relationship with C.
>
> Will merge to 'next'?
> source: <pull.1303.git.1660704498.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
I had some minor comments [1] but besides that, overall I think this is
good.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20220818222416.3567602-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/
> * en/submodule-merge-messages-fixes (2022-08-17) 3 commits
> - merge-ort: provide helpful submodule update message when possible
> - merge-ort: add comment to avoid surprise with new sub_flag variable
> - merge-ort: remove translator lego in new "submodule conflict suggestion"
> (this branch uses cw/submodule-merge-messages.)
>
> Further update the help messages given while merging submodules.
>
> Will merge to 'next'?
> source: <pull.1325.v2.git.1660718028.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
(I reviewed a newer version than what's currently in
https://github.com/gitster/git.)
This looks good. I would have rewritten the last sentence of patch 2's
commit message as "Initialize it instead to the generic
CONFLICT_SUBMODULE_FAILED_TO_MERGE value. There is no change to
user-visible behavior, as the only time this variable is read is when
printing submodule conflict information, which special-cases
CONFLICT_SUBMODULE_NOT_INITIALIZED and
CONFLICT_SUBMODULE_HISTORY_NOT_AVAILABLE, and treats everything else
identically.", but the existing commit message is fine too.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-18 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-18 2:23 What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2022, #06; Wed, 17) Junio C Hamano
2022-08-18 12:42 ` js/bisect-in-c (was: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2022, #06; Wed, 17)) Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-08-19 11:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-08-19 14:28 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-08-18 13:18 ` What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2022, #06; Wed, 17) Derrick Stolee
2022-08-18 13:19 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-08-18 15:00 ` ds/* (was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2022, #06; Wed, 17)) Derrick Stolee
2022-08-18 17:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-18 18:12 ` vd/* (was: " Victoria Dye
2022-08-18 19:09 ` vd/* Junio C Hamano
2022-08-18 22:42 ` Jonathan Tan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220818224222.3569397-1-jonathantanmy@google.com \
--to=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).