From: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
To: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
"David Kågedal" <davidk@lysator.liu.se>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dir.c: avoid c99 array initialization
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:45:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4KsgvHQW6DRyM-ubFIcJEblIIJPpRQFHIc-4QMPGe5YzXAU8P5wWCA@cipher.nrlssc.navy.mil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81b0412b0808281412j2a5643ceu49a49cf62002f0be@mail.gmail.com>
Alex Riesen wrote:
> 2008/8/28 Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>:
>> diff --git a/builtin-cat-file.c b/builtin-cat-file.c
>> index 7441a56..d954c09 100644
>> --- a/builtin-cat-file.c
>> +++ b/builtin-cat-file.c
>> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ int cmd_cat_file(int argc, const char **argv, const char *pr
>> int opt = 0, batch = 0;
>> const char *exp_type = NULL, *obj_name = NULL;
>>
>> - const struct option options[] = {
>> + struct option options[] = {
>> OPT_GROUP("<type> can be one of: blob, tree, commit, tag"),
>
> #ifdef HAVE_CONST
> #define gitconst const
> #else
> #define gitconst
> #endif
>
> - const struct option options[] = {
> + gitconst struct option options[] = {
>
> ?
The problem is not that the const modifier is unrecognized. You can see in
the above patch that the const modifier was not removed from exp_type or
obj_name.
I think the warning on line 217 is the most important where it complains
about a non-constant initializer, followed by complaints that the left
operand must be a modifiable lvalue.
I notice now that some functions have the 'struct option' and all of its
parameters declared static. I think this would satisfy the compiler, but
then the options would not be reinitialized if the function was called
again. Or are cmd_*() functions defined to only ever be called once?
-brandon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-28 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-18 23:39 [FYI] How I compile on SunOS 5.7 with the SUNWspro compiler and ksh Brandon Casey
2008-08-18 23:55 ` [PATCH] Makefile: configuration for SunOS 5.7 Brandon Casey
2008-08-18 23:57 ` [PATCH] dir.c: avoid c99 array initialization Brandon Casey
2008-08-28 15:32 ` David Kågedal
2008-08-28 15:41 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-08-28 16:45 ` Brandon Casey
2008-08-28 18:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-28 21:01 ` Brandon Casey
2008-08-28 21:12 ` Alex Riesen
2008-08-28 21:45 ` Brandon Casey [this message]
2008-08-28 20:01 ` Alex Riesen
2008-08-28 20:16 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-08-28 20:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-28 22:47 ` [PATCH v2] dir.c: Avoid " Brandon Casey
2008-08-28 22:56 ` Alex Riesen
2008-08-28 23:03 ` Brandon Casey
2008-08-28 20:27 ` [PATCH] dir.c: avoid " Alex Riesen
2008-08-29 11:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-08-19 0:08 ` [PATCH FYI] reset,cat-file: remove const declaration from array Brandon Casey
2008-08-19 0:11 ` [PATCH FYI] test-lib.sh: work around ksh's trap shortcomings Brandon Casey
2008-08-19 0:13 ` [PATCH FYI] t1002-read-tree-m-u-2way.sh: use 'git diff -U0' rather than 'diff -U0' Brandon Casey
2008-08-19 0:18 ` [PATCH FYI] Work around sed issues Brandon Casey
2008-08-19 0:20 ` [PATCH FYI] t9301-fast-export.sh: don't unset config variable while we're skipping test 4 Brandon Casey
2008-08-19 0:20 ` [FYI] How I compile on SunOS 5.7 with the SUNWspro compiler and ksh Jeff King
2008-08-19 0:47 ` Brandon Casey
2008-08-19 2:01 ` Jeff King
2008-08-19 0:22 ` [PATCH FYI] t9700/test.pl: backwards compatibility improvements Brandon Casey
2008-09-15 11:54 ` Tom G. Christensen
2008-09-15 16:20 ` Brandon Casey
2008-09-15 16:32 ` Brandon Casey
2008-09-15 16:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] t9700/test.pl: no longer requires File::Basename Brandon Casey
2008-09-15 16:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] t9700/test.pl: avoid bareword 'STDERR' in 3-argument open() Brandon Casey
2008-09-15 16:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] t9700/test.pl: remove File::Temp requirement Brandon Casey
2008-09-15 18:27 ` Tom G. Christensen
2008-08-19 6:13 ` [FYI] How I compile on SunOS 5.7 with the SUNWspro compiler and ksh Alex Riesen
2008-08-19 15:42 ` Brandon Casey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4KsgvHQW6DRyM-ubFIcJEblIIJPpRQFHIc-4QMPGe5YzXAU8P5wWCA@cipher.nrlssc.navy.mil \
--to=casey@nrlssc.navy.mil \
--cc=davidk@lysator.liu.se \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=raa.lkml@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).