Re: Making GitGitGadget conversion lossless

[Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>]

On 2/26/20 10:01 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> As I said already, I do not think that the desire to get the
> bit-for-bit identical commit is compatible with the idea to discuss
> e-mailed patches---the pieces of patch e-mail will become "you may
> look at them, you may apply them, but it is no use to comment on
> them to get them improved".  So, I dunno.

For me, at least, the goal was to be able to store previous patch
submissions in git (even if it is not merged into the main tree) so
that you can use git and all its tools (diff, log, blame, grep, notes,
etc.) to browse previous versions and browse discussions _and_ use the
SHA1 as a stable identifier for a specific submission.

The point of having the stable identifier is so that the submitter can
take comments into account and resubmit their patchset while still
keeping a (stable, universal, unambiguous) reference to their previous
submission.

I don't see the incompatibility at all. The whole point was that the
current email workflow used by Linux and git (that includes discussion,
feedback, and revision) _does not need to change_.


Vegard