git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Ping Yin" <pkufranky@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: builtin-status submodule summary
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:39:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vprtxp8ew.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46dff0320803140730jeef5808r7da67a103ce7b171@mail.gmail.com> (Ping Yin's message of "Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:30:51 +0800")

"Ping Yin" <pkufranky@gmail.com> writes:

> So i think this series should go along with the submodule summary series.

Perhaps eventually, but definitely not this round, I am afraid.

The usefulness of the output in the current implementation of the
"summary" itself is not even proven at this point.  Nobody other than you
has jumped up-and-down and said "submodule summary is great and should be
in status, I did not know what I was missing!" yet.

I hope we verified the code well enough to make sure that people who use
"git submodule" command but do not type "git submodule summary" would not
get hurt by the addition.  For a new feature, that is more important than
how well the new feature works and how useful the new feature is.  And by
shipping a release with it will give it a wider exposure and hopefully a
chance for it to mature to get more useful.  The series just got into a
"harmless to others and is releasable" shape.

Recall how many rounds "submodule summary" took to get into that state,
and how much time and effort were spent on it.  Use it as a yardstick to
guesstimate how much further effort and time will be needed to get the
changes to git-status into a reasonable shape.

It may happen eventually, but not before 1.5.5.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-14 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-13 13:48 builtin-status submodule summary Ping Yin
2008-03-13 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] git-submodule summary: --for-status option Ping Yin
2008-03-13 13:48   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] builtin-status: submodule summary support Ping Yin
2008-03-13 13:48     ` [PATCH v2 3/4] builtin-status: configurable submodule summary size Ping Yin
2008-03-13 13:48       ` [PATCH v2 4/4] buitin-status: Add tests for submodule summary Ping Yin
2008-03-13 14:21         ` Johannes Sixt
2008-03-13 18:04           ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-13 18:14             ` Ping Yin
2008-03-13 18:09           ` Ping Yin
2008-03-13 14:15       ` [PATCH v2 3/4] builtin-status: configurable submodule summary size Johannes Sixt
2008-03-13 14:11     ` [PATCH v2 2/4] builtin-status: submodule summary support Johannes Sixt
2008-03-13 18:01       ` Ping Yin
2008-03-14 14:30 ` builtin-status submodule summary Ping Yin
2008-03-14 16:39   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-03-14 17:45     ` Ping Yin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vprtxp8ew.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pkufranky@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).