git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: none
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 21:00:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFQ2z_N611Y+3TXWLsOKjL=muk3XON11gaS1qyGxZUWp8Leqag@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqsgmjb13r.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 8:53 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> My initial impression was that the API overuses typedef.  We tend to
> avoid doing
>
>         struct _foo { ... };
>         typedef struct _foo foo;
>
> and instead write "struct foo" explicitly to make us well aware of
> what we are talking about.

Thanks, i'll have a look at changing it. I use typedef mainly for
ergonomics, but now that the code is written, I can introduce more
verbosity.

> But the set of operations defined in the header file seemed at the
> right granularity in order to interface with the refs.h & refs/* API
> we have.  It however was unclear to me how transactional ref updates
> would work with it.

Transactions have to interface with the file system. I imagine that
different libraries (libgit vs. cgit) would have different primitives
for dealing with the file system, hence I haven't implemented that
part. Do you have an idea of how I could implement it in a way that is
agnostic of libgit2 vs. cgit?

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich
I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays.
--

Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich

Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg

Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-20  5:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-20  3:49 Han-Wen Nienhuys
2019-11-20  4:52 ` none Junio C Hamano
2019-11-20  5:00   ` Han-Wen Nienhuys [this message]
2019-11-22 10:38   ` reftable (was: Re: none) Han-Wen Nienhuys
2019-11-20  5:30 ` your mail Taylor Blau
2019-11-20  8:05   ` Christian Couder
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-16 18:43 Dorcas Litunya
2023-10-17 20:21 ` none Junio C Hamano
2019-03-03 13:20 [PATCH 1/3] test functions: Add new function `test_file_not_empty` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-03 13:29 ` Rohit Ashiwal
2019-03-03 13:33   ` none Junio C Hamano
2018-10-05  6:20 [PATCH] doc: fix a typo and clarify a sentence Junio C Hamano
2018-10-10 15:20 ` Mihir Mehta
2018-10-10 22:19   ` none Junio C Hamano
2016-04-11 19:04 (unknown), miwilliams
2016-04-11 19:18 ` none Matthieu Moy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFQ2z_N611Y+3TXWLsOKjL=muk3XON11gaS1qyGxZUWp8Leqag@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=hanwen@google.com \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).