From: Jubilee Young <workingjubilee@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gitster@pobox.com, Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>,
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
johannes.schindelin@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] Implement rev-list --bisect* --first-parent
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 21:07:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPNHn3oCOQRriDLmLFag0DWgvq2t3TLMiu25HyBKcuBuwLgb2g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191106213609.57464-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>
Hi! Thanks for all the feedback.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 1:36 PM Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
wrote:
>
> > > Also, clarify in the commit message somewhere that this commit does
not
> > > change the behavior of "git bisect".
> >
> > s/\.$/ when used without the "--first-parent" option&/; you mean?
>
> As far as I know, "git bisect" doesn't support --first-parent, whether
> before or after this patch.
Correct, it still provides the usual "usage: git bisect ..." error.
This provides plumbing but no porcelain right now.
> At first I thought that this patch also teaches "git bisect" to support
> "--first-parent", but that is not the case. Only "git rev-list" learns
> to make "--bisect" work with "--first-parent". So I wanted the
> clarification. (But if you think that the clarification is unnecessary,
> that's fine too.)
I had been trying to deduce the best approach for writing the commit
message but in the end I retained a hunch that I didn't yet know enough
to write the best one so this conversation is quite illuminating re:
commit style.
If it's even slightly confusing I would like to clarify, since bisect.c
and git bisect are... very different!
I think Dscho's recommendation also will result in the patch overall
being far more lucid.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-07 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-05 5:21 [Outreachy] [PATCH v7 0/1] Revenge of --bisect --first-parent workingjubilee
2019-11-05 5:21 ` [PATCH v7 1/1] Implement rev-list --bisect* --first-parent workingjubilee
2019-11-05 23:04 ` Jonathan Tan
2019-11-06 2:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-06 11:30 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-11-06 21:36 ` Jonathan Tan
2019-11-07 3:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-07 5:07 ` Jubilee Young [this message]
2019-11-07 16:00 ` Jubilee Young
2019-11-07 18:56 ` Jonathan Tan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPNHn3oCOQRriDLmLFag0DWgvq2t3TLMiu25HyBKcuBuwLgb2g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=workingjubilee@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).