From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] experiment: pull: change --ff-only and default mode
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 23:34:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqa6uqcbnd.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPp-BE7B5hn3Fc4zD1o+qoqihJqCut=R1TP_fxMXW42+6iL+w@mail.gmail.com> (Elijah Newren's message of "Sat, 5 Dec 2020 09:29:01 -0800")
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:06 PM Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This commit message should say something more than just "change x", it
> should have some words about what it is change from or to. I think
> the thrust of the patch is allowing --ff-only, --merge, and --rebase
> to countermand an earlier otherwise-conflicting option. Perhaps a
> commit message of the form:
>
> In git, we sometimes allow conflicting command line options with the
> last one winning, e.g.
> git log --patch --no-patch
> git log --no-patch --patch
> other times we just error out when conflicting options are given, e.g.
> git checkout -b --orphan NEWBRANCH
> git checkout --orphan -b NEWBRANCH
> Previously, we did neither with --no-ff, --merge, and --rebase.
> Change these options to have a last-one-wins behavior.
If the choices are clearly among --ff-only, --merge and --rebase, I
am fine with the last-one-wins change, and your explanation does
make sense.
I however am not sure how --no-ff and other --ff=<how> friends
should interact with the primary two choices. --ff=no is used by
those who want to merge, so "--merge --ff=no" combination is a
sensible thing to accept. The same can be said for "--merge --ff"
(fast-forward when able). It is interesting to realize that it
would not be wrong to say "--rebase --ff" even. When their history
we are rebasing our own work on top is a descendant of our history,
such a rebase operation ends up in fast-forwarding to their tip.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-07 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-04 6:16 [PATCH v2 00/14] pull: default warning improvements Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] doc: pull: explain what is a fast-forward Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 22:55 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-05 1:21 ` Jacob Keller
2020-12-04 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] pull: improve default warning Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 22:59 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-05 0:12 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-05 0:56 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-05 1:56 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-05 9:23 ` Chris Torek
2020-12-05 11:47 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-05 16:28 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-05 21:27 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-06 1:01 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-06 14:31 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-07 7:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-07 9:16 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-07 18:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-07 19:09 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-07 19:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-07 22:14 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-07 23:30 ` Jacob Keller
2020-12-08 2:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-08 3:15 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-08 20:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-09 9:52 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-09 19:05 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-10 2:39 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-10 6:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-10 9:08 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-10 10:01 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-11 7:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-11 11:33 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-14 21:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-14 22:30 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-14 23:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-15 2:36 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-15 2:31 ` Jeff King
2020-12-15 3:49 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-15 11:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-15 12:53 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-07 9:23 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] pull: refactor fast-forward check Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] pull: cleanup autostash check Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 23:07 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-05 0:47 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-05 0:57 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-04 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] pull: trivial cleanup Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 23:09 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-05 0:48 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] pull: move default warning Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 23:18 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-04 23:36 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] pull: display default warning only when non-ff Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 23:24 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-05 1:03 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] pull: trivial whitespace style fix Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] pull: introduce --merge option Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 23:27 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-05 1:06 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] pull: add proper error with --ff-only Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 23:34 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-05 1:18 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] tentative: pull: change the semantics of --ff-only Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 23:39 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-05 4:01 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-05 4:06 ` [PATCH] experiment: pull: change --ff-only and default mode Felipe Contreras
2020-12-05 17:29 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-05 18:16 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-07 7:34 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2020-12-05 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] tentative: pull: change the semantics of --ff-only Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] pull: show warning with --ff Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 23:41 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-05 1:25 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] test: merge-pull-config: trivial cleanup Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 23:41 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-04 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] test: pull-options: revert unnecessary changes Felipe Contreras
2020-12-04 23:49 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-05 1:28 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqa6uqcbnd.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).