From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>, "Johannes Sixt" <j6t@kdbg.org>,
"Martin Ågren" <martin.agren@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cbtree.h: define cb_init() in terms of CBTREE_INIT
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:50:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqlf3gjufm.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877df0wknp.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyIEFy?= =?utf-8?B?bmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Tue, 28 Sep 2021 21:42:45 +0200")
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 28 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>>
>>>> >> + memcpy(t, &blank, sizeof(*t));
>>>> >
>>>> > Is
>>>> > *t = blank;
>>>> >
>>>> > not a thing in C?
>>>
>>> It would be fine to use struct assignment here, and should be equivalent
>>> in most compilers. They know about memcpy() and will inline it as
>>> appropriate.
>>
>> FWIW, I'd be fine with structure assignment, but we already have too
>> many such memcpy(<ptr>, &<struct>, sizeof(struct)), adding one more
>> is not giving us too much incremental burden for later clean-up.
>>
>>> I think some C programmers tend to prefer memcpy() just because that's
>>> how they think. It also wasn't legal in old K&R compilers, but as far as
>>> I know was in C89.
>>
>> I think so, too.
>
> Getting back to the topic of this v2 in general, my reading of the
> discussion since then is that nothing in it necessitated a v3 re-roll to
> address outstanding issues. If I've got that wrong please shout...
I was hoping that these can hit 'next' soonish.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-28 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-27 0:39 [PATCH 0/5] Designated initializer cleanup & conversion Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-27 0:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] submodule-config.h: remove unused SUBMODULE_INIT macro Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-27 0:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] *.[ch] *_INIT macros: use { 0 } for a "zero out" idiom Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-27 2:27 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-09-27 6:35 ` Johannes Sixt
2021-09-27 20:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-27 0:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] *.h _INIT macros: don't specify fields equal to 0 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-27 0:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] *.h: move some *_INIT to designated initializers Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-27 0:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] cbtree.h: define cb_init() in terms of CBTREE_INIT Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-27 6:37 ` Johannes Sixt
2021-09-27 11:02 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-27 23:54 ` Jeff King
2021-09-28 6:15 ` Johannes Sixt
2021-09-28 18:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-28 19:42 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-28 20:50 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-09-27 9:13 ` Phillip Wood
2021-09-27 11:00 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-30 10:01 ` Phillip Wood
2021-09-27 12:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Designated initializer cleanup & conversion Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-27 12:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] submodule-config.h: remove unused SUBMODULE_INIT macro Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-27 23:34 ` Jeff King
2021-09-27 12:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] *.[ch] *_INIT macros: use { 0 } for a "zero out" idiom Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-27 23:24 ` Jeff King
2021-09-28 0:25 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-28 0:46 ` Jeff King
2021-09-28 1:44 ` Ramsay Jones
2021-09-27 12:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] *.h _INIT macros: don't specify fields equal to 0 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-27 21:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-27 12:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] *.h: move some *_INIT to designated initializers Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-27 23:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-27 12:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] cbtree.h: define cb_init() in terms of CBTREE_INIT Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqlf3gjufm.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=martin.agren@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).