From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Neeraj Singh <nksingh85@gmail.com>
Cc: "Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
"Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>,
"Bagas Sanjaya" <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
"Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im>,
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
"Neeraj K. Singh" <neerajsi@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:44:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqv8wlejgc.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANQDOdcDbYHyRuJj0hV_LcYPJdkoJjF_EGN4CXpndc4VQ9dVAA@mail.gmail.com> (Neeraj Singh's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:38:45 -0800")
Neeraj Singh <nksingh85@gmail.com> writes:
>> > At the conclusion of this series, I defined 'default' as an aggregate
>> > option that includes
>> > the platform default. I'd prefer not to have any statefulness of the
>> > core.fsync setting so
>> > that there is less confusion about the final fsync configuration.
>>
>> Then scratch your preference ;-)
>
> Just to clarify, linguistically, by 'scratch' do you mean that I should drop
> my preference
Yes.
> Is there a well-defined place where we know that configuration processing
> is complete? The most obvious spot to me to integrate these two values would
> be the first time we need to figure out the fsync state.
That sounds like a good place.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-10 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-04 3:28 [PATCH 0/2] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-04 3:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] fsync: add writeout-only mode for fsyncing repo data Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-06 7:54 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-04 3:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 11:44 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-12-07 12:14 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-07 23:29 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-07 12:18 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-07 23:58 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-07 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 11:53 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-12-07 20:46 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-07 12:29 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-07 21:44 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-08 10:05 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-09 0:14 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-09 0:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-09 4:08 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-09 6:18 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-01-18 23:50 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-01-19 15:28 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-19 14:52 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-28 1:28 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-07 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Patrick Steinhardt
2021-12-08 0:44 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-09 0:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] " Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09 0:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09 0:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09 0:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09 0:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] core.fsync: add a `derived-metadata` aggregate option Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-01-08 1:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj Singh
2022-01-09 0:55 ` rsbecker
2022-01-10 19:00 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-01 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 " Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-01 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-01 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-02 0:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-02 1:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-11 21:18 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-11 22:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-11 23:04 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-11 23:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-12 0:39 ` rsbecker
2022-02-14 7:04 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-02-14 17:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 13:42 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-09 18:50 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-09 20:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 12:33 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 17:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 20:05 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-11 20:38 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-01 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-01 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] core.fsync: add a `derived-metadata` aggregate option Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] wrapper: move inclusion of CSPRNG headers the wrapper.c file Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 1:21 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 1:26 ` brian m. carlson
2022-03-10 1:56 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 0:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 2:53 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 7:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 18:38 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-03-10 19:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 20:25 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 21:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 13:11 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-03-10 17:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 9:53 ` Future-proofed syncing of refs Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 9:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] core.fsync: add `fsync_component()` wrapper which doesn't die Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 17:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 18:40 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 9:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] core.fsync: new option to harden loose references Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 18:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 19:03 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 22:54 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-11 6:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11 9:15 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-11 9:36 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-10 9:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] core.fsync: new option to harden packed references Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 18:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11 9:10 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] wrapper: make inclusion of Windows csprng header tightly scoped Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control infrastructure Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] core.fsync: add configuration parsing Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-28 11:06 ` Jiang Xin
2022-03-28 19:45 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-15 19:12 ` [PATCH v7] " Neeraj Singh
2022-03-15 19:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-15 19:56 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-23 14:20 ` do we have too much fsync() configuration in 'next'? (was: [PATCH v7] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options) Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-25 21:24 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-26 0:24 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-26 1:23 ` do we have too much fsync() configuration in 'next'? Junio C Hamano
2022-03-26 1:25 ` do we have too much fsync() configuration in 'next'? (was: [PATCH v7] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options) Neeraj Singh
2022-03-26 15:31 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-27 5:27 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-27 12:43 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-28 10:56 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-28 11:25 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-28 19:56 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-30 16:59 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 23:34 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11 0:03 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-11 18:50 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-13 23:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11 9:58 ` [PATCH v2] core.fsync: new option to harden references Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-25 6:11 ` SZEDER Gábor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqv8wlejgc.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=neerajsi@microsoft.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=nksingh85@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).