* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization
@ 2020-02-04 1:10 Matt Roper
2020-02-04 1:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/tgl: Program MBUS_ABOX{1, 2}_CTL during display init Matt Roper
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matt Roper @ 2020-02-04 1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
It wasn't terribly clear from the bspec's wording, but after discussion
with the hardware folks, it turns out that we need to preserve the
pre-existing contents of the MBUS ABOX control register when
initializing a few specific bits.
Bspec: 49213
Bspec: 50096
Fixes: 4cb4585e5a7f ("drm/i915/icl: initialize MBus during display init")
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
index 6d91e180db99..529319c962e8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
@@ -4504,14 +4504,18 @@ static void icl_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
static void icl_mbus_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
- u32 val;
+ u32 mask, val;
+ mask = MBUS_ABOX_BT_CREDIT_POOL1_MASK |
+ MBUS_ABOX_BT_CREDIT_POOL2_MASK |
+ MBUS_ABOX_B_CREDIT_MASK |
+ MBUS_ABOX_BW_CREDIT_MASK;
val = MBUS_ABOX_BT_CREDIT_POOL1(16) |
- MBUS_ABOX_BT_CREDIT_POOL2(16) |
- MBUS_ABOX_B_CREDIT(1) |
- MBUS_ABOX_BW_CREDIT(1);
+ MBUS_ABOX_BT_CREDIT_POOL2(16) |
+ MBUS_ABOX_B_CREDIT(1) |
+ MBUS_ABOX_BW_CREDIT(1);
- intel_de_write(dev_priv, MBUS_ABOX_CTL, val);
+ intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, MBUS_ABOX_CTL, mask, val);
}
static void hsw_assert_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
--
2.24.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/tgl: Program MBUS_ABOX{1, 2}_CTL during display init
2020-02-04 1:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization Matt Roper
@ 2020-02-04 1:10 ` Matt Roper
2020-02-20 17:46 ` Matt Atwood
2020-02-04 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization Patchwork
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matt Roper @ 2020-02-04 1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
On gen11 we only needed to program MBus credits into MBUS_ABOX_CTL
during display initialization, but on gen12 we're now supposed to
program the same values into MBUS_ABOX1_CTL and MBUS_ABOX2_CTL as well.
v2:
- Program registers with rmw to preserve contents of unrelated bits.
- Switch to the new display uncore helpers.
Bspec: 49213
Bspec: 50096
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 4 ++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
index 529319c962e8..f638691cda6e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
@@ -4516,6 +4516,10 @@ static void icl_mbus_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
MBUS_ABOX_BW_CREDIT(1);
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, MBUS_ABOX_CTL, mask, val);
+ if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
+ intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, MBUS_ABOX1_CTL, mask, val);
+ intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, MBUS_ABOX2_CTL, mask, val);
+ }
}
static void hsw_assert_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 0bd431f6a011..d3df704ee099 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -2865,6 +2865,8 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
#define MI_ARB_STATE _MMIO(0x20e4) /* 915+ only */
#define MBUS_ABOX_CTL _MMIO(0x45038)
+#define MBUS_ABOX1_CTL _MMIO(0x45048)
+#define MBUS_ABOX2_CTL _MMIO(0x4504C)
#define MBUS_ABOX_BW_CREDIT_MASK (3 << 20)
#define MBUS_ABOX_BW_CREDIT(x) ((x) << 20)
#define MBUS_ABOX_B_CREDIT_MASK (0xF << 16)
--
2.24.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization
2020-02-04 1:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization Matt Roper
2020-02-04 1:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/tgl: Program MBUS_ABOX{1, 2}_CTL during display init Matt Roper
@ 2020-02-04 23:40 ` Patchwork
2020-02-05 0:11 ` Matt Roper
2020-02-10 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization (rev2) Patchwork
2020-02-20 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization Matt Atwood
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2020-02-04 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Roper; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/72950/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7866 -> Patchwork_16408
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_16408 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_16408, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/index.html
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_16408:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files:
- fi-skl-6770hq: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][1]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16408 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_close_race@basic-threads:
- fi-byt-j1900: [PASS][2] -> [TIMEOUT][3] ([fdo#112271] / [i915#1084] / [i915#816])
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_close_race@basic-threads.html
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_close_race@basic-threads.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live_blt:
- fi-hsw-4770r: [PASS][4] -> [DMESG-FAIL][5] ([i915#553] / [i915#725])
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
- fi-byt-j1900: [PASS][6] -> [DMESG-FAIL][7] ([i915#725])
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
- fi-hsw-4770: [PASS][8] -> [DMESG-FAIL][9] ([i915#553] / [i915#725])
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
- fi-byt-j1900: [PASS][10] -> [DMESG-FAIL][11] ([i915#722])
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds:
- fi-byt-j1900: [FAIL][12] ([i915#694]) -> [PASS][13]
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds.html
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
- fi-kbl-x1275: [DMESG-FAIL][14] ([i915#943]) -> [PASS][15]
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-kbl-x1275/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-kbl-x1275/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [FAIL][16] ([fdo#111407]) -> [PASS][17]
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
#### Warnings ####
* igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts:
- fi-byt-j1900: [TIMEOUT][18] ([fdo#112271] / [i915#1084]) -> [FAIL][19] ([i915#694])
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
[fdo#111407]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111407
[fdo#112271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271
[i915#1084]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1084
[i915#553]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/553
[i915#694]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/694
[i915#722]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/722
[i915#725]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/725
[i915#816]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/816
[i915#943]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/943
Participating hosts (46 -> 45)
------------------------------
Additional (6): fi-skl-6770hq fi-ilk-650 fi-icl-u3 fi-kbl-8809g fi-icl-dsi fi-bsw-nick
Missing (7): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan fi-bwr-2160 fi-ctg-p8600 fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* Linux: CI_DRM_7866 -> Patchwork_16408
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_7866: bd8251861a5c1ac11e3510355f503675a05d26e6 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5417: 33cc93c8ba5daa0b7498f297a4f626844d895d06 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_16408: 69823ec347f2cb0a10a2d866488d511f0cd09c2a @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
69823ec347f2 drm/i915/tgl: Program MBUS_ABOX{1, 2}_CTL during display init
87fa15148708 drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization
2020-02-04 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization Patchwork
@ 2020-02-05 0:11 ` Matt Roper
2020-02-05 0:16 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matt Roper @ 2020-02-05 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 11:40:06PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/72950/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7866 -> Patchwork_16408
> ====================================================
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_16408 absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_16408, please notify your bug team to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
> External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/index.html
>
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_16408:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Possible regressions ####
>
> * igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files:
> - fi-skl-6770hq: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][1]
> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files.html
Unrelated to this series. These patches only touch a function that's
exclusive to gen11+, so it would have no impact on SKL (which in this
case seems to have just crashed or been disconnected with no visible
errors).
Matt
>
>
> Known issues
> ------------
>
> Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16408 that come from known issues:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Issues hit ####
>
> * igt@gem_close_race@basic-threads:
> - fi-byt-j1900: [PASS][2] -> [TIMEOUT][3] ([fdo#112271] / [i915#1084] / [i915#816])
> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_close_race@basic-threads.html
> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_close_race@basic-threads.html
>
> * igt@i915_selftest@live_blt:
> - fi-hsw-4770r: [PASS][4] -> [DMESG-FAIL][5] ([i915#553] / [i915#725])
> [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
> [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
> - fi-byt-j1900: [PASS][6] -> [DMESG-FAIL][7] ([i915#725])
> [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
> [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
> - fi-hsw-4770: [PASS][8] -> [DMESG-FAIL][9] ([i915#553] / [i915#725])
> [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
> [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
>
> * igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
> - fi-byt-j1900: [PASS][10] -> [DMESG-FAIL][11] ([i915#722])
> [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
> [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
>
>
> #### Possible fixes ####
>
> * igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds:
> - fi-byt-j1900: [FAIL][12] ([i915#694]) -> [PASS][13]
> [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds.html
> [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds.html
>
> * igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
> - fi-kbl-x1275: [DMESG-FAIL][14] ([i915#943]) -> [PASS][15]
> [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-kbl-x1275/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
> [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-kbl-x1275/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
>
> * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
> - fi-kbl-7500u: [FAIL][16] ([fdo#111407]) -> [PASS][17]
> [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
> [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
>
>
> #### Warnings ####
>
> * igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts:
> - fi-byt-j1900: [TIMEOUT][18] ([fdo#112271] / [i915#1084]) -> [FAIL][19] ([i915#694])
> [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7866/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
> [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
>
>
> [fdo#111407]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111407
> [fdo#112271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271
> [i915#1084]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1084
> [i915#553]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/553
> [i915#694]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/694
> [i915#722]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/722
> [i915#725]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/725
> [i915#816]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/816
> [i915#943]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/943
>
>
> Participating hosts (46 -> 45)
> ------------------------------
>
> Additional (6): fi-skl-6770hq fi-ilk-650 fi-icl-u3 fi-kbl-8809g fi-icl-dsi fi-bsw-nick
> Missing (7): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan fi-bwr-2160 fi-ctg-p8600 fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus
>
>
> Build changes
> -------------
>
> * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
> * Linux: CI_DRM_7866 -> Patchwork_16408
>
> CI-20190529: 20190529
> CI_DRM_7866: bd8251861a5c1ac11e3510355f503675a05d26e6 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
> IGT_5417: 33cc93c8ba5daa0b7498f297a4f626844d895d06 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
> Patchwork_16408: 69823ec347f2cb0a10a2d866488d511f0cd09c2a @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
>
>
> == Linux commits ==
>
> 69823ec347f2 drm/i915/tgl: Program MBUS_ABOX{1, 2}_CTL during display init
> 87fa15148708 drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization
>
> == Logs ==
>
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/index.html
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization
2020-02-05 0:11 ` Matt Roper
@ 2020-02-05 0:16 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2020-02-05 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Roper, intel-gfx
Quoting Matt Roper (2020-02-05 00:11:46)
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 11:40:06PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization
> > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/72950/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7866 -> Patchwork_16408
> > ====================================================
> >
> > Summary
> > -------
> >
> > **FAILURE**
> >
> > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_16408 absolutely need to be
> > verified manually.
> >
> > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> > introduced in Patchwork_16408, please notify your bug team to allow them
> > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> >
> > External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/index.html
> >
> > Possible new issues
> > -------------------
> >
> > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_16408:
> >
> > ### IGT changes ###
> >
> > #### Possible regressions ####
> >
> > * igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files:
> > - fi-skl-6770hq: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][1]
> > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files.html
>
> Unrelated to this series. These patches only touch a function that's
> exclusive to gen11+, so it would have no impact on SKL (which in this
> case seems to have just crashed or been disconnected with no visible
> errors).
ext4 panicked, not for the first time on that machine.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization (rev2)
2020-02-04 1:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization Matt Roper
2020-02-04 1:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/tgl: Program MBUS_ABOX{1, 2}_CTL during display init Matt Roper
2020-02-04 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization Patchwork
@ 2020-02-10 22:20 ` Patchwork
2020-02-20 21:22 ` Matt Roper
2020-02-20 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization Matt Atwood
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2020-02-10 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Roper; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/72950/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7903 -> Patchwork_16509
====================================================
Summary
-------
**WARNING**
Minor unknown changes coming with Patchwork_16509 need to be verified
manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_16509, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/index.html
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_16509:
### IGT changes ###
#### Warnings ####
* igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
- fi-ivb-3770: [SKIP][1] ([fdo#109271]) -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-ivb-3770/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-ivb-3770/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16509 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic:
- fi-byt-n2820: [PASS][3] -> [TIMEOUT][4] ([fdo#112271])
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-byt-n2820/igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-byt-n2820/igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live_blt:
- fi-hsw-4770r: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6] ([i915#553] / [i915#725])
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live_blt:
- fi-bsw-n3050: [INCOMPLETE][7] ([i915#392]) -> [PASS][8]
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
- fi-hsw-4770: [DMESG-FAIL][9] ([i915#553] / [i915#725]) -> [PASS][10]
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
- fi-cfl-8700k: [DMESG-FAIL][11] ([i915#623]) -> [PASS][12]
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
- fi-byt-n2820: [DMESG-FAIL][13] ([i915#1052]) -> [PASS][14]
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
- fi-cfl-guc: [INCOMPLETE][15] ([CI#80] / [fdo#106070] / [i915#424]) -> [PASS][16]
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
- fi-cml-s: [DMESG-FAIL][17] ([i915#877]) -> [PASS][18]
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-cml-s/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-cml-s/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt:
- fi-bdw-5557u: [TIMEOUT][19] ([fdo#112271]) -> [PASS][20]
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt.html
[20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt.html
[CI#80]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/i915-infra/issues/80
[fdo#106070]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106070
[fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
[fdo#112271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271
[i915#1052]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1052
[i915#392]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/392
[i915#424]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/424
[i915#553]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/553
[i915#623]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/623
[i915#725]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/725
[i915#877]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/877
Participating hosts (47 -> 44)
------------------------------
Additional (3): fi-skl-lmem fi-kbl-7560u fi-snb-2600
Missing (6): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-snb-2520m fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* Linux: CI_DRM_7903 -> Patchwork_16509
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_7903: 47b768c475f4a11a48bc43e6228660f8b26a542b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5433: 6a96c17f3a1b4e1f90b1a0b0ce42a7219875d1a4 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_16509: 5a3c01778052d138ca6065b76e55f9a98d225f34 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
5a3c01778052 drm/i915/tgl: Program MBUS_ABOX{1, 2}_CTL during display init
901419eb8a59 drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization
2020-02-04 1:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization Matt Roper
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-02-10 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization (rev2) Patchwork
@ 2020-02-20 17:44 ` Matt Atwood
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matt Atwood @ 2020-02-20 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Roper, intel-gfx
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 05:10:31PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> It wasn't terribly clear from the bspec's wording, but after discussion
> with the hardware folks, it turns out that we need to preserve the
> pre-existing contents of the MBUS ABOX control register when
> initializing a few specific bits.
>
> Bspec: 49213
> Bspec: 50096
> Fixes: 4cb4585e5a7f ("drm/i915/icl: initialize MBus during display init")
> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index 6d91e180db99..529319c962e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -4504,14 +4504,18 @@ static void icl_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> static void icl_mbus_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - u32 val;
> + u32 mask, val;
>
> + mask = MBUS_ABOX_BT_CREDIT_POOL1_MASK |
> + MBUS_ABOX_BT_CREDIT_POOL2_MASK |
> + MBUS_ABOX_B_CREDIT_MASK |
> + MBUS_ABOX_BW_CREDIT_MASK;
> val = MBUS_ABOX_BT_CREDIT_POOL1(16) |
> - MBUS_ABOX_BT_CREDIT_POOL2(16) |
> - MBUS_ABOX_B_CREDIT(1) |
> - MBUS_ABOX_BW_CREDIT(1);
> + MBUS_ABOX_BT_CREDIT_POOL2(16) |
> + MBUS_ABOX_B_CREDIT(1) |
> + MBUS_ABOX_BW_CREDIT(1);
>
> - intel_de_write(dev_priv, MBUS_ABOX_CTL, val);
> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, MBUS_ABOX_CTL, mask, val);
> }
>
> static void hsw_assert_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> --
> 2.24.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/tgl: Program MBUS_ABOX{1, 2}_CTL during display init
2020-02-04 1:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/tgl: Program MBUS_ABOX{1, 2}_CTL during display init Matt Roper
@ 2020-02-20 17:46 ` Matt Atwood
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matt Atwood @ 2020-02-20 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Roper, intel-gfx
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 05:10:32PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> On gen11 we only needed to program MBus credits into MBUS_ABOX_CTL
> during display initialization, but on gen12 we're now supposed to
> program the same values into MBUS_ABOX1_CTL and MBUS_ABOX2_CTL as well.
>
> v2:
> - Program registers with rmw to preserve contents of unrelated bits.
> - Switch to the new display uncore helpers.
>
> Bspec: 49213
> Bspec: 50096
> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 4 ++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index 529319c962e8..f638691cda6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -4516,6 +4516,10 @@ static void icl_mbus_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> MBUS_ABOX_BW_CREDIT(1);
>
> intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, MBUS_ABOX_CTL, mask, val);
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, MBUS_ABOX1_CTL, mask, val);
> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, MBUS_ABOX2_CTL, mask, val);
> + }
> }
>
> static void hsw_assert_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 0bd431f6a011..d3df704ee099 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -2865,6 +2865,8 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
> #define MI_ARB_STATE _MMIO(0x20e4) /* 915+ only */
>
> #define MBUS_ABOX_CTL _MMIO(0x45038)
> +#define MBUS_ABOX1_CTL _MMIO(0x45048)
> +#define MBUS_ABOX2_CTL _MMIO(0x4504C)
> #define MBUS_ABOX_BW_CREDIT_MASK (3 << 20)
> #define MBUS_ABOX_BW_CREDIT(x) ((x) << 20)
> #define MBUS_ABOX_B_CREDIT_MASK (0xF << 16)
> --
> 2.24.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization (rev2)
2020-02-10 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization (rev2) Patchwork
@ 2020-02-20 21:22 ` Matt Roper
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matt Roper @ 2020-02-20 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:20:17PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization (rev2)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/72950/
> State : success
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7903 -> Patchwork_16509
> ====================================================
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> **WARNING**
>
> Minor unknown changes coming with Patchwork_16509 need to be verified
> manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_16509, please notify your bug team to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
> External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/index.html
>
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_16509:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Warnings ####
>
> * igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
> - fi-ivb-3770: [SKIP][1] ([fdo#109271]) -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-ivb-3770/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-ivb-3770/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
Unrelated IVB issue; wouldn't be caused by this patch.
Patchwork also shows clean results for the shards CI, although I can't
find the results mail in my inbox.
Applied to dinq. Thanks Matt Atwood for the reviews.
Matt
>
>
> Known issues
> ------------
>
> Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16509 that come from known issues:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Issues hit ####
>
> * igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic:
> - fi-byt-n2820: [PASS][3] -> [TIMEOUT][4] ([fdo#112271])
> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-byt-n2820/igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic.html
> [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-byt-n2820/igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic.html
>
> * igt@i915_selftest@live_blt:
> - fi-hsw-4770r: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6] ([i915#553] / [i915#725])
> [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
> [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
>
>
> #### Possible fixes ####
>
> * igt@i915_selftest@live_blt:
> - fi-bsw-n3050: [INCOMPLETE][7] ([i915#392]) -> [PASS][8]
> [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
> [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
> - fi-hsw-4770: [DMESG-FAIL][9] ([i915#553] / [i915#725]) -> [PASS][10]
> [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
> [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
>
> * igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
> - fi-cfl-8700k: [DMESG-FAIL][11] ([i915#623]) -> [PASS][12]
> [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
> [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
> - fi-byt-n2820: [DMESG-FAIL][13] ([i915#1052]) -> [PASS][14]
> [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
> [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
> - fi-cfl-guc: [INCOMPLETE][15] ([CI#80] / [fdo#106070] / [i915#424]) -> [PASS][16]
> [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
> [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
> - fi-cml-s: [DMESG-FAIL][17] ([i915#877]) -> [PASS][18]
> [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-cml-s/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
> [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-cml-s/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
>
> * igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt:
> - fi-bdw-5557u: [TIMEOUT][19] ([fdo#112271]) -> [PASS][20]
> [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7903/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt.html
> [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt.html
>
>
> [CI#80]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/i915-infra/issues/80
> [fdo#106070]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106070
> [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
> [fdo#112271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271
> [i915#1052]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1052
> [i915#392]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/392
> [i915#424]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/424
> [i915#553]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/553
> [i915#623]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/623
> [i915#725]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/725
> [i915#877]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/877
>
>
> Participating hosts (47 -> 44)
> ------------------------------
>
> Additional (3): fi-skl-lmem fi-kbl-7560u fi-snb-2600
> Missing (6): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-snb-2520m fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus
>
>
> Build changes
> -------------
>
> * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
> * Linux: CI_DRM_7903 -> Patchwork_16509
>
> CI-20190529: 20190529
> CI_DRM_7903: 47b768c475f4a11a48bc43e6228660f8b26a542b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
> IGT_5433: 6a96c17f3a1b4e1f90b1a0b0ce42a7219875d1a4 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
> Patchwork_16509: 5a3c01778052d138ca6065b76e55f9a98d225f34 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
>
>
> == Linux commits ==
>
> 5a3c01778052 drm/i915/tgl: Program MBUS_ABOX{1, 2}_CTL during display init
> 901419eb8a59 drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization
>
> == Logs ==
>
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16509/index.html
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-20 21:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-04 1:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization Matt Roper
2020-02-04 1:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/tgl: Program MBUS_ABOX{1, 2}_CTL during display init Matt Roper
2020-02-20 17:46 ` Matt Atwood
2020-02-04 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization Patchwork
2020-02-05 0:11 ` Matt Roper
2020-02-05 0:16 ` Chris Wilson
2020-02-10 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization (rev2) Patchwork
2020-02-20 21:22 ` Matt Roper
2020-02-20 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization Matt Atwood
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).