From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 01/12] drm/i915: Expose list of clients in sysfs
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:41:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <158384050785.16414.7982219438580665617@build.alporthouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200309183129.2296-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-03-09 18:31:18)
> +static int
> +__i915_drm_client_register(struct i915_drm_client *client,
> + struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + struct i915_drm_clients *clients = client->clients;
> + struct device_attribute *attr;
> + int ret = -ENOMEM;
> + char idstr[32];
> +
> + client->pid = get_task_pid(task, PIDTYPE_PID);
> +
> + client->name = kstrdup(task->comm, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!client->name)
> + goto err_name;
> +
> + if (!clients->root)
> + return 0; /* intel_fbdev_init registers a client before sysfs */
> +
> + snprintf(idstr, sizeof(idstr), "%u", client->id);
> + client->root = kobject_create_and_add(idstr, clients->root);
> + if (!client->root)
> + goto err_client;
> +
> + attr = &client->attr.name;
> + sysfs_attr_init(&attr->attr);
> + attr->attr.name = "name";
> + attr->attr.mode = 0444;
> + attr->show = show_client_name;
> +
> + ret = sysfs_create_file(client->root, (struct attribute *)attr);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_attr;
> +
> + attr = &client->attr.pid;
> + sysfs_attr_init(&attr->attr);
> + attr->attr.name = "pid";
> + attr->attr.mode = 0444;
> + attr->show = show_client_pid;
> +
> + ret = sysfs_create_file(client->root, (struct attribute *)attr);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_attr;
How do we think we will extend this (e.g. for client/1/(trace,debug))?
i915_drm_client_add_attr() ?
Or should we put all the attr here and make them known a priori?
I think I prefer i915_drm_client_add_attr, but that will also require a
notification chain? And that smells like overengineering.
At any rate we have 2 other definite users around the corner for the
client sysfs, so we should look at what API suits us.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-10 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-09 18:31 [Intel-gfx] [RFC 00/12] Per client engine busyness Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 01/12] drm/i915: Expose list of clients in sysfs Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 21:34 ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-09 23:26 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 0:13 ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-10 8:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 11:41 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-03-10 12:04 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 17:59 ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 02/12] drm/i915: Update client name on context create Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 18:11 ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-10 19:52 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 03/12] drm/i915: Make GEM contexts track DRM clients Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 18:20 ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 04/12] drm/i915: Use explicit flag to mark unreachable intel_context Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 15:30 ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 05/12] drm/i915: Track runtime spent in unreachable intel_contexts Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 18:25 ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-10 20:00 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 06/12] drm/i915: Track runtime spent in closed GEM contexts Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 18:28 ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-10 20:01 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 07/12] drm/i915: Track all user contexts per client Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 08/12] drm/i915: Expose per-engine client busyness Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 18:32 ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-10 20:04 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 20:12 ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-11 10:17 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 09/12] drm/i915: Track per-context engine busyness Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 18:36 ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 10/12] drm/i915: Carry over past software tracked context runtime Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 11/12] drm/i915: Prefer software tracked context busyness Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 12/12] compare runtimes Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Per client engine busyness (rev5) Patchwork
2020-03-09 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-03-09 22:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 00/12] Per client engine busyness Chris Wilson
2020-03-09 23:30 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 15:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Per client engine busyness (rev5) Patchwork
2020-03-10 15:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork
2020-03-10 15:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-03-10 15:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=158384050785.16414.7982219438580665617@build.alporthouse.com \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).