From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Patchwork <patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [01/36] drm/i915: Handle very early engine initialisation failure (rev2)
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 12:39:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <159101159719.29407.14651351122274434786@build.alporthouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159100924007.14888.836552676635186270@emeril.freedesktop.org>
Quoting Patchwork (2020-06-01 12:00:40)
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: series starting with [01/36] drm/i915: Handle very early engine initialisation failure (rev2)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77857/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8560_full -> Patchwork_17828_full
> ====================================================
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_17828_full absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_17828_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
>
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_17828_full:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Possible regressions ####
>
> * igt@runner@aborted:
> - shard-hsw: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1]
> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17828/shard-hsw6/igt@runner@aborted.html
>
>
> #### Suppressed ####
>
> The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
> They do not affect the overall result.
>
> * {igt@gem_exec_fence@parallel@vecs0}:
> - shard-hsw: [PASS][2] -> [FAIL][3] +3 similar issues
> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8560/shard-hsw1/igt@gem_exec_fence@parallel@vecs0.html
> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17828/shard-hsw2/igt@gem_exec_fence@parallel@vecs0.html
Sigh. They dropped the memory compare from MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX in Haswell.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-01 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-01 7:24 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/36] drm/i915: Handle very early engine initialisation failure Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/36] drm/i915/gt: Split low level gen2-7 CS emitters Chris Wilson
2020-06-02 9:04 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/36] drm/i915/gt: Move legacy context wa to intel_workarounds Chris Wilson
2020-06-02 9:05 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/36] drm/i915: Trim the ironlake+ irq handler Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 11:49 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-06-01 12:00 ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 12:08 ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/36] Restore "drm/i915: drop engine_pin/unpin_breadcrumbs_irq" Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/36] drm/i915/gt: Couple tasklet scheduling for all CS interrupts Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/36] drm/i915/gt: Support creation of 'internal' rings Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/36] drm/i915/gt: Use client timeline address for seqno writes Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/36] drm/i915: Support inter-engine semaphores on gen6/7 Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/36] drm/i915/gt: Infrastructure for ring scheduling Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/36] drm/i915/gt: Enable busy-stats for ring-scheduler Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 8:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/36] drm/i915/gt: Track if an engine requires forcewake w/a Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 12:17 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/36] drm/i915: Relinquish forcewake immediately after manual grouping Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 12:20 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/36] drm/i915/gt: Implement ring scheduler for gen6/7 Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/36] drm/i915/gt: Enable ring scheduling " Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/36] drm/i915/gem: Mark the buffer pool as active for the cmdparser Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/36] drm/i915/gem: Async GPU relocations only Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/36] drm/i915: Add list_for_each_entry_safe_continue_reverse Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/36] drm/i915/gem: Separate reloc validation into an earlier step Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/36] drm/i915/gem: Lift GPU relocation allocation Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/36] drm/i915/gem: Build the reloc request first Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/36] drm/i915/gem: Add all GPU reloc awaits/signals en masse Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/36] dma-buf: Proxy fence, an unsignaled fence placeholder Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/36] drm/i915: Unpeel awaits on a proxy fence Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/36] drm/i915/gem: Make relocations atomic within execbuf Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/36] drm/syncobj: Allow use of dma-fence-proxy Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/36] drm/i915/gem: Teach execbuf how to wait on future syncobj Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/36] drm/i915/gem: Allow combining submit-fences with syncobj Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/36] drm/i915/gt: Declare when we enabled timeslicing Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/36] drm/i915: Drop I915_IDLE_ENGINES_TIMEOUT Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/36] drm/i915: Always defer fenced work to the worker Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/36] drm/i915/gem: Assign context id for async work Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/36] drm/i915: Export a preallocate variant of i915_active_acquire() Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/36] drm/i915/gem: Separate the ww_mutex walker into its own list Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/36] drm/i915/gem: Asynchronous GTT unbinding Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/36] drm/i915/gem: Bind the fence async for execbuf Chris Wilson
2020-06-01 7:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/36] drm/i915: Handle very early engine initialisation failure Patchwork
2020-06-01 7:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-06-01 7:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-06-01 8:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/36] drm/i915: Handle very early engine initialisation failure (rev2) Patchwork
2020-06-01 8:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-06-01 8:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-06-01 11:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-06-01 11:39 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-06-01 11:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/36] drm/i915: Handle very early engine initialisation failure Mika Kuoppala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=159101159719.29407.14651351122274434786@build.alporthouse.com \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).