intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Apply interactive priority to explicit flip fences
@ 2021-01-18 11:59 Chris Wilson
  2021-01-18 12:59 ` Chris Wilson
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2021-01-18 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Chris Wilson

Currently, if a modeset/pageflip needs to wait for render completion to
an object, we boost the priority of that rendering above all other work.
We can apply the same interactive priority boosting to explicit fences
that we can unwrap into a native i915_request (i.e. sync_file).

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 16 +++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h   |  3 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c     | 49 ++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index b728792e0c27..3a6b2e79c68b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -13514,15 +13514,6 @@ void intel_plane_unpin_fb(struct intel_plane_state *old_plane_state)
 		intel_unpin_fb_vma(vma, old_plane_state->flags);
 }
 
-static void fb_obj_bump_render_priority(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
-{
-	struct i915_sched_attr attr = {
-		.priority = I915_USER_PRIORITY(I915_PRIORITY_DISPLAY),
-	};
-
-	i915_gem_object_wait_priority(obj, 0, &attr);
-}
-
 /**
  * intel_prepare_plane_fb - Prepare fb for usage on plane
  * @_plane: drm plane to prepare for
@@ -13539,6 +13530,9 @@ int
 intel_prepare_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *_plane,
 		       struct drm_plane_state *_new_plane_state)
 {
+	struct i915_sched_attr attr = {
+		.priority = I915_USER_PRIORITY(I915_PRIORITY_DISPLAY),
+	};
 	struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(_plane);
 	struct intel_plane_state *new_plane_state =
 		to_intel_plane_state(_new_plane_state);
@@ -13578,6 +13572,8 @@ intel_prepare_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *_plane,
 	}
 
 	if (new_plane_state->uapi.fence) { /* explicit fencing */
+		i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(new_plane_state->uapi.fence,
+					     &attr);
 		ret = i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(&state->commit_ready,
 						    new_plane_state->uapi.fence,
 						    i915_fence_timeout(dev_priv),
@@ -13599,7 +13595,7 @@ intel_prepare_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *_plane,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	fb_obj_bump_render_priority(obj);
+	i915_gem_object_wait_priority(obj, 0, &attr);
 	i915_gem_object_flush_frontbuffer(obj, ORIGIN_DIRTYFB);
 
 	if (!new_plane_state->uapi.fence) { /* implicit fencing */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
index be14486f63a7..31d05bfa57ce 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
@@ -512,6 +512,9 @@ static inline void __start_cpu_write(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 		obj->cache_dirty = true;
 }
 
+void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
+				  const struct i915_sched_attr *attr);
+
 int i915_gem_object_wait(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 			 unsigned int flags,
 			 long timeout);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
index c1b13ac50d0f..3078f3a2864b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/dma-fence-array.h>
+#include <linux/dma-fence-chain.h>
 #include <linux/jiffies.h>
 
 #include "gt/intel_engine.h"
@@ -44,8 +45,7 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_reservation(struct dma_resv *resv,
 		unsigned int count, i;
 		int ret;
 
-		ret = dma_resv_get_fences_rcu(resv,
-							&excl, &count, &shared);
+		ret = dma_resv_get_fences_rcu(resv, &excl, &count, &shared);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
@@ -91,39 +91,60 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_reservation(struct dma_resv *resv,
 	return timeout;
 }
 
-static void __fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
-				 const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
+static bool fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
+			       const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
 {
 	struct i915_request *rq;
 	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
 
 	if (dma_fence_is_signaled(fence) || !dma_fence_is_i915(fence))
-		return;
+		return false;
 
 	rq = to_request(fence);
 	engine = rq->engine;
 
-	local_bh_disable();
 	rcu_read_lock(); /* RCU serialisation for set-wedged protection */
 	if (engine->schedule)
 		engine->schedule(rq, attr);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-	local_bh_enable(); /* kick the tasklets if queues were reprioritised */
+
+	return true;
 }
 
-static void fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
-			       const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
+static inline bool __dma_fence_is_chain(const struct dma_fence *fence)
 {
+	return fence->ops != &dma_fence_chain_ops;
+}
+
+void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
+				  const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
+{
+	if (dma_fence_is_signaled(fence))
+		return;
+
+	local_bh_disable();
+
 	/* Recurse once into a fence-array */
 	if (dma_fence_is_array(fence)) {
 		struct dma_fence_array *array = to_dma_fence_array(fence);
 		int i;
 
 		for (i = 0; i < array->num_fences; i++)
-			__fence_set_priority(array->fences[i], attr);
+			fence_set_priority(array->fences[i], attr);
+	} else if (__dma_fence_is_chain(fence)) {
+		struct dma_fence *iter;
+
+		dma_fence_chain_for_each(iter, fence) {
+			if (!fence_set_priority(to_dma_fence_chain(iter)->fence,
+						attr))
+				break;
+		}
+		dma_fence_put(iter);
 	} else {
-		__fence_set_priority(fence, attr);
+		fence_set_priority(fence, attr);
 	}
+
+	local_bh_enable(); /* kick the tasklets if queues were reprioritised */
 }
 
 int
@@ -139,12 +160,12 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_priority(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 		int ret;
 
 		ret = dma_resv_get_fences_rcu(obj->base.resv,
-							&excl, &count, &shared);
+					      &excl, &count, &shared);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
 		for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
-			fence_set_priority(shared[i], attr);
+			i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(shared[i], attr);
 			dma_fence_put(shared[i]);
 		}
 
@@ -154,7 +175,7 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_priority(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	}
 
 	if (excl) {
-		fence_set_priority(excl, attr);
+		i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(excl, attr);
 		dma_fence_put(excl);
 	}
 	return 0;
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-19 19:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-18 11:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Apply interactive priority to explicit flip fences Chris Wilson
2021-01-18 12:59 ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-18 17:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: Apply interactive priority to explicit flip fences (rev2) Patchwork
2021-01-18 23:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-01-19 16:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Apply interactive priority to explicit flip fences Ville Syrjälä
2021-01-19 16:53   ` Chris Wilson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).