* [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip CPU synchronisation on dmabuf attachments
@ 2017-11-30 18:07 Chris Wilson
2017-11-30 18:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-11-30 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
dma-bufs are device coherent, with explicit CPU synchronisation provided
via the begin/end cpu access ioctls. As the coherency of the dma-buf is
explicitly defined to be under user control, flushing any caches on
attach/detach of the dma-buf is additional work that doesn't aide the
user in the slightest.
Suggested-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
index 864439a214c8..68c8bfd8eb7a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
@@ -67,7 +67,9 @@ static struct sg_table *i915_gem_map_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachme
src = sg_next(src);
}
- if (!dma_map_sg(attachment->dev, st->sgl, st->nents, dir)) {
+ if (!dma_map_sg_attrs(attachment->dev,
+ st->sgl, st->nents, dir,
+ DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC)) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err_free_sg;
}
@@ -90,7 +92,9 @@ static void i915_gem_unmap_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
{
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = dma_buf_to_obj(attachment->dmabuf);
- dma_unmap_sg(attachment->dev, sg->sgl, sg->nents, dir);
+ dma_unmap_sg_attrs(attachment->dev,
+ sg->sgl, sg->nents, dir,
+ DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
sg_free_table(sg);
kfree(sg);
--
2.15.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Skip CPU synchronisation on dmabuf attachments
2017-11-30 18:07 [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip CPU synchronisation on dmabuf attachments Chris Wilson
@ 2017-11-30 18:56 ` Patchwork
2017-11-30 20:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-11-30 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Skip CPU synchronisation on dmabuf attachments
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/34702/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 34702v1 drm/i915: Skip CPU synchronisation on dmabuf attachments
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/34702/revisions/1/mbox/
Test debugfs_test:
Subgroup read_all_entries:
dmesg-warn -> DMESG-FAIL (fi-elk-e7500) fdo#103989
Test gem_exec_reloc:
Subgroup basic-cpu-active:
dmesg-fail -> PASS (fi-gdg-551) fdo#102582 +1
Test gem_mmap_gtt:
Subgroup basic-small-bo-tiledx:
fail -> PASS (fi-gdg-551) fdo#102575
fdo#103989 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103989
fdo#102582 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102582
fdo#102575 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102575
fi-bdw-5557u total:288 pass:267 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:439s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:288 pass:264 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:443s
fi-blb-e6850 total:288 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 time:381s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:288 pass:242 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:514s
fi-bwr-2160 total:288 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:105 time:282s
fi-bxt-dsi total:288 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:506s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:504s
fi-byt-j1900 total:288 pass:253 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:486s
fi-byt-n2820 total:288 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:475s
fi-elk-e7500 total:224 pass:162 dwarn:15 dfail:1 fail:0 skip:45
fi-gdg-551 total:288 pass:179 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:108 time:270s
fi-glk-1 total:288 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:539s
fi-hsw-4770 total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:374s
fi-hsw-4770r total:288 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 time:260s
fi-ilk-650 total:288 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:393s
fi-ivb-3520m total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:486s
fi-ivb-3770 total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:447s
fi-kbl-7500u total:288 pass:263 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:485s
fi-kbl-7560u total:288 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:532s
fi-kbl-7567u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:477s
fi-kbl-r total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:534s
fi-pnv-d510 total:288 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:589s
fi-skl-6260u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:449s
fi-skl-6600u total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:535s
fi-skl-6700hq total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:565s
fi-skl-6700k total:288 pass:264 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:523s
fi-skl-6770hq total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:495s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:288 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:450s
fi-snb-2520m total:288 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:550s
fi-snb-2600 total:288 pass:248 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:419s
Blacklisted hosts:
fi-cfl-s2 total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:607s
fi-cnl-y total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:545s
fi-glk-dsi total:288 pass:257 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:30 time:484s
07df63d96015816fbf6dd44e634474587931a294 drm-tip: 2017y-11m-30d-17h-26m-53s UTC integration manifest
be6a7ad5bd19 drm/i915: Skip CPU synchronisation on dmabuf attachments
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7383/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Skip CPU synchronisation on dmabuf attachments
2017-11-30 18:07 [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip CPU synchronisation on dmabuf attachments Chris Wilson
2017-11-30 18:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2017-11-30 20:48 ` Patchwork
2020-02-10 19:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Dongwon Kim
2020-02-10 19:46 ` Dongwon Kim
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-11-30 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Skip CPU synchronisation on dmabuf attachments
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/34702/
State : success
== Summary ==
Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
Subgroup fbc-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-blt:
pass -> FAIL (shard-snb) fdo#101623 +1
Test drv_selftest:
Subgroup mock_sanitycheck:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (shard-snb) fdo#102707 +1
Test gem_tiled_swapping:
Subgroup non-threaded:
incomplete -> PASS (shard-snb)
Test kms_cursor_crc:
Subgroup cursor-256x256-suspend:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (shard-snb) fdo#102365
fdo#101623 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101623
fdo#102707 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102707
fdo#102365 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102365
shard-hsw total:2650 pass:1525 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:9 skip:1113 time:9214s
shard-snb total:2663 pass:1307 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:12 skip:1342 time:8111s
Blacklisted hosts:
shard-apl total:2641 pass:1668 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:22 skip:949 time:13431s
shard-kbl total:2663 pass:1792 dwarn:12 dfail:0 fail:27 skip:832 time:10865s
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7383/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip CPU synchronisation on dmabuf attachments
2017-11-30 18:07 [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip CPU synchronisation on dmabuf attachments Chris Wilson
2017-11-30 18:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-11-30 20:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
@ 2020-02-10 19:34 ` Dongwon Kim
2020-02-10 19:54 ` Dongwon Kim
2020-02-10 19:46 ` Dongwon Kim
3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dongwon Kim @ 2020-02-10 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: chris; +Cc: intel-gfx, james.xiong
Acked-by: Dongwon Kim <dongwon.kim@intel.com>
It makes lots of sense to make CPU cache operation done only when
needed. Similar change was already landed in drm-prime and other
vendor specific drivers. We are actually seeing huge performance
boost in a specific customer case where dmabuf was used between
camera driver (importer) and i915 after applying this patch.
Please consider upstreaming this code change.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip CPU synchronisation on dmabuf attachments
2017-11-30 18:07 [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip CPU synchronisation on dmabuf attachments Chris Wilson
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-02-10 19:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Dongwon Kim
@ 2020-02-10 19:46 ` Dongwon Kim
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dongwon Kim @ 2020-02-10 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: chris; +Cc: intel-gfx, james.xiong
(mistakenly put a wrong message id in "In-reply-To")
Acked-by: Dongwon Kim <dongwon.kim@intel.com>
It makes lots of sense to make CPU cache operation done only when
needed. Similar change was already landed in drm-prime and other
vendor specific drivers. We are actually seeing huge performance
boost in a specific customer case where dmabuf was used between
camera driver (importer) and i915 after applying this patch.
Please consider upstreaming this code change.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip CPU synchronisation on dmabuf attachments
2020-02-10 19:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Dongwon Kim
@ 2020-02-10 19:54 ` Dongwon Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dongwon Kim @ 2020-02-10 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: chris; +Cc: intel-gfx, james.xiong
The patch is here:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2017-November/148988.html
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:34:07AM -0800, Dongwon Kim wrote:
> Acked-by: Dongwon Kim <dongwon.kim@intel.com>
>
> It makes lots of sense to make CPU cache operation done only when
> needed. Similar change was already landed in drm-prime and other
> vendor specific drivers. We are actually seeing huge performance
> boost in a specific customer case where dmabuf was used between
> camera driver (importer) and i915 after applying this patch.
>
> Please consider upstreaming this code change.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-10 20:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-30 18:07 [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip CPU synchronisation on dmabuf attachments Chris Wilson
2017-11-30 18:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-11-30 20:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-02-10 19:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Dongwon Kim
2020-02-10 19:54 ` Dongwon Kim
2020-02-10 19:46 ` Dongwon Kim
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).