intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing
@ 2020-05-26 11:20 Chris Wilson
  2020-05-26 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing (rev2) Patchwork
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2020-05-26 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

Reduce the irq_work llist for attaching the callbacks to the signal for
both smaller structs (two fewer pointers!) and simpler [debug] code:

Function                                     old     new   delta
irq_execute_cb                                35      34      -1
__igt_breadcrumbs_smoketest                 1684    1682      -2
i915_request_retire                         2003    1996      -7
__i915_request_create                       1047    1040      -7
__notify_execute_cb                          135     126      -9
__i915_request_ctor                          188     178     -10
__await_execution.part.constprop             451     440     -11
igt_wait_request                             924     714    -210

One minor artifact is that the order of cb exection is reversed. No
current use cases are affected by that change.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index c282719ad3ac..877eaaccba81 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@
 #include "intel_pm.h"
 
 struct execute_cb {
-	struct list_head link;
 	struct irq_work work;
 	struct i915_sw_fence *fence;
 	void (*hook)(struct i915_request *rq, struct dma_fence *signal);
@@ -189,14 +188,14 @@ static void irq_execute_cb_hook(struct irq_work *wrk)
 
 static void __notify_execute_cb(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
-	struct execute_cb *cb;
+	struct execute_cb *cb, *cn;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock);
 
-	if (list_empty(&rq->execute_cb))
+	if (llist_empty(&rq->execute_cb))
 		return;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(cb, &rq->execute_cb, link)
+	llist_for_each_entry_safe(cb, cn, rq->execute_cb.first, work.llnode)
 		irq_work_queue(&cb->work);
 
 	/*
@@ -209,7 +208,7 @@ static void __notify_execute_cb(struct i915_request *rq)
 	 * preempt-to-idle cycle on the target engine, all the while the
 	 * master execute_cb may refire.
 	 */
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->execute_cb);
+	init_llist_head(&rq->execute_cb);
 }
 
 static inline void
@@ -327,7 +326,7 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq)
 		set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE, &rq->fence.flags);
 		__notify_execute_cb(rq);
 	}
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->execute_cb));
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&rq->execute_cb));
 	spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
 
 	remove_from_client(rq);
@@ -357,6 +356,12 @@ void i915_request_retire_upto(struct i915_request *rq)
 	} while (i915_request_retire(tmp) && tmp != rq);
 }
 
+static void __llist_add(struct llist_node *node, struct llist_head *head)
+{
+	node->next = head->first;
+	head->first = node;
+}
+
 static int
 __await_execution(struct i915_request *rq,
 		  struct i915_request *signal,
@@ -395,7 +400,7 @@ __await_execution(struct i915_request *rq,
 		i915_sw_fence_complete(cb->fence);
 		kmem_cache_free(global.slab_execute_cbs, cb);
 	} else {
-		list_add_tail(&cb->link, &signal->execute_cb);
+		__llist_add(&cb->work.llnode, &signal->execute_cb);
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(&signal->lock);
 
@@ -704,7 +709,7 @@ static void __i915_request_ctor(void *arg)
 	rq->file_priv = NULL;
 	rq->capture_list = NULL;
 
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->execute_cb);
+	init_llist_head(&rq->execute_cb);
 }
 
 struct i915_request *
@@ -794,7 +799,7 @@ __i915_request_create(struct intel_context *ce, gfp_t gfp)
 	rq->batch = NULL;
 	GEM_BUG_ON(rq->file_priv);
 	GEM_BUG_ON(rq->capture_list);
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->execute_cb));
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&rq->execute_cb));
 
 	/*
 	 * Reserve space in the ring buffer for all the commands required to
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
index 8ec7ee4dbadc..5d4709a3dace 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ struct i915_request {
 			ktime_t emitted;
 		} duration;
 	};
-	struct list_head execute_cb;
+	struct llist_head execute_cb;
 	struct i915_sw_fence semaphore;
 
 	/*
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing (rev2)
  2020-05-26 11:20 [Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing Chris Wilson
@ 2020-05-26 12:02 ` Patchwork
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2020-05-26 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77281/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8537 -> Patchwork_17777
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17777/index.html


Changes
-------

  No changes found


Participating hosts (50 -> 45)
------------------------------

  Additional (1): fi-kbl-7560u 
  Missing    (6): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus 


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_8537 -> Patchwork_17777

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_8537: 05a47cd761c49c3fa87648c30df0fd4d64b0b8c5 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5678: c1f30ee09ac2e7eb3e8e90245239731a169a6050 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_17777: c668d9c787ca7c6450cd4c7bb82a68f4c31ac439 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

c668d9c787ca drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17777/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-26 12:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-26 11:20 [Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing Chris Wilson
2020-05-26 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing (rev2) Patchwork

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).