[Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915: Drop i915_request.lock requirement for intel_rps_boost()

* [Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915: Drop i915_request.lock requirement for intel_rps_boost()
@ 2020-12-31  9:31 Chris Wilson
  2020-12-31 11:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
  2020-12-31 14:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2020-12-31  9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

Since we use a flag within i915_request.flags to indicate when we have
boosted the request (so that we only apply the boost) once, this can be
used as the serialisation with i915_request_retire() to avoid having to
explicitly take the i915_request.lock which is more heavily contended.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c   |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c       | 23 +++++++++++------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps_types.h |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c       |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c       |  4 +---
 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
index a0f10e8bbd21..d4f4452ce5ed 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static int rps_boost_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 		   intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->efficient_freq),
 		   intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->boost_freq));
 
-	seq_printf(m, "Wait boosts: %d\n", atomic_read(&rps->boosts));
+	seq_printf(m, "Wait boosts: %d\n", READ_ONCE(rps->boosts));
 
 	if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 6 && intel_rps_is_active(rps)) {
 		struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
index f74d5e09e176..146a956ed12d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -917,28 +917,27 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps)
 
 void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
-	struct intel_rps *rps = &READ_ONCE(rq->engine)->gt->rps;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	if (i915_request_signaled(rq) || !intel_rps_is_active(rps))
+	if (i915_request_signaled(rq) || i915_request_has_waitboost(rq))
 		return;
 
 	/* Serializes with i915_request_retire() */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
-	if (!i915_request_has_waitboost(rq) &&
-	    !dma_fence_is_signaled_locked(&rq->fence)) {
-		set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags);
+	if (!test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags)) {
+		struct intel_rps *rps = &READ_ONCE(rq->engine)->gt->rps;
+
+		if (atomic_fetch_inc(&rps->num_waiters))
+			return;
+
+		if (!intel_rps_is_active(rps))
+			return;
 
 		GT_TRACE(rps_to_gt(rps), "boost fence:%llx:%llx\n",
 			 rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno);
 
-		if (!atomic_fetch_inc(&rps->num_waiters) &&
-		    READ_ONCE(rps->cur_freq) < rps->boost_freq)
+		if (READ_ONCE(rps->cur_freq) < rps->boost_freq)
 			schedule_work(&rps->work);
 
-		atomic_inc(&rps->boosts);
+		WRITE_ONCE(rps->boosts, rps->boosts + 1); /* debug only */
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
 }
 
 int intel_rps_set(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 val)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps_types.h
index 38083f0402d9..029fe13cf303 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps_types.h
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct intel_rps {
 	} power;
 
 	atomic_t num_waiters;
-	atomic_t boosts;
+	unsigned int boosts;
 
 	/* manual wa residency calculations */
 	struct intel_rps_ei ei;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 7332478a3dd5..de8e0e44cfb6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static int i915_rps_boost_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 		   intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->efficient_freq),
 		   intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->boost_freq));
 
-	seq_printf(m, "Wait boosts: %d\n", atomic_read(&rps->boosts));
+	seq_printf(m, "Wait boosts: %d\n", READ_ONCE(rps->boosts));
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index 03ac6eead4db..8db3391d8625 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -307,10 +307,8 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq)
 		spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
 	}
 
-	if (i915_request_has_waitboost(rq)) {
-		GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&rq->engine->gt->rps.num_waiters));
+	if (test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags))
 		atomic_dec(&rq->engine->gt->rps.num_waiters);
-	}
 
 	/*
 	 * We only loosely track inflight requests across preemption,
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread