intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 32/63] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal, v2.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:25:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210128162612.927917-33-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210128162612.927917-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

From: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>

Stolen objects need to lock, and we may call put_pages when
refcount drops to 0, ensure all calls are handled correctly.

Changes since v1:
- Rebase on top of upstream changes.

Idea-from: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c  | 14 ++++++++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c | 12 +++++++-----
 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
index 9d51164bf6f2..919dd668944c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
@@ -144,6 +144,20 @@ i915_gem_object_put(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 
 #define assert_object_held(obj) dma_resv_assert_held((obj)->base.resv)
 
+/*
+ * If more than one potential simultaneous locker, assert held.
+ */
+static inline void assert_object_held_shared(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Note mm list lookup is protected by
+	 * kref_get_unless_zero().
+	 */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) &&
+	    kref_read(&obj->base.refcount) > 0)
+		lockdep_assert_held(&obj->mm.lock);
+}
+
 static inline int __i915_gem_object_lock(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 					 struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 					 bool intr)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
index a24617af3c93..2d0065fa6e80 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ void __i915_gem_object_set_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	bool shrinkable;
 	int i;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&obj->mm.lock);
+	assert_object_held_shared(obj);
 
 	if (i915_gem_object_is_volatile(obj))
 		obj->mm.madv = I915_MADV_DONTNEED;
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ void __i915_gem_object_set_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 		struct list_head *list;
 		unsigned long flags;
 
+		lockdep_assert_held(&obj->mm.lock);
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&i915->mm.obj_lock, flags);
 
 		i915->mm.shrink_count++;
@@ -91,6 +92,8 @@ int ____i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
 	int err;
 
+	assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+
 	if (unlikely(obj->mm.madv != I915_MADV_WILLNEED)) {
 		drm_dbg(&i915->drm,
 			"Attempting to obtain a purgeable object\n");
@@ -118,6 +121,8 @@ int __i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
+	assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+
 	if (unlikely(!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj))) {
 		GEM_BUG_ON(i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj));
 
@@ -145,7 +150,7 @@ void i915_gem_object_truncate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 /* Try to discard unwanted pages */
 void i915_gem_object_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&obj->mm.lock);
+	assert_object_held_shared(obj);
 	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj));
 
 	if (obj->ops->writeback)
@@ -176,6 +181,8 @@ __i915_gem_object_unset_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 {
 	struct sg_table *pages;
 
+	assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+
 	pages = fetch_and_zero(&obj->mm.pages);
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pages))
 		return pages;
@@ -203,6 +210,9 @@ int __i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 	if (i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj))
 		return -EBUSY;
 
+	/* May be called by shrinker from within get_pages() (on another bo) */
+	assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+
 	i915_gem_object_release_mmap_offset(obj);
 
 	/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
index 51c2ef6bd8ac..2f2c7f6242dc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
@@ -637,13 +637,15 @@ static int __i915_gem_object_create_stolen(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
 	cache_level = HAS_LLC(mem->i915) ? I915_CACHE_LLC : I915_CACHE_NONE;
 	i915_gem_object_set_cache_coherency(obj, cache_level);
 
-	err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
+	if (WARN_ON(!i915_gem_object_trylock(obj)))
+		return -EBUSY;
 
-	i915_gem_object_init_memory_region(obj, mem);
+	err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
+	if (!err)
+		i915_gem_object_init_memory_region(obj, mem);
+	i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
 
-	return 0;
+	return err;
 }
 
 static int _i915_gem_object_stolen_init(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
-- 
2.30.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-28 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-28 16:25 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 00/63] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 01/63] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v7 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 17:42   ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 02/63] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 03/63] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 04/63] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 05/63] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 06/63] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 07/63] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 08/63] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 09/63] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 10/63] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 11/63] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 12/63] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:44   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 13/63] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:47   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-01-29 11:42     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-02-01 19:11       ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 14/63] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED for userptr, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:49   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 15/63] drm/i915: Make compilation of userptr code depend on MMU_NOTIFIER Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 16/63] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v6 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 17/63] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 18/63] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 19/63] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 20/63] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 21/63] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 22/63] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 23/63] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 24/63] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 25/63] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 26/63] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-02-01 12:50   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-02-01 13:03     ` Thomas Hellström
2021-02-01 13:08     ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 27/63] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 28/63] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 29/63] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 30/63] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 31/63] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 33/63] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 34/63] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 35/63] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 36/63] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 37/63] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 38/63] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 39/63] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 40/63] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 41/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 42/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 43/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 44/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 45/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 46/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 47/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 48/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 49/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 50/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 51/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 52/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 53/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists and lrc selftests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 54/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 55/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 56/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 57/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 58/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 59/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 60/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 61/63] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 62/63] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 63/63] drm/i915: Move gt_revoke() slightly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 17:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev14) Patchwork
2021-01-28 17:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-01-28 17:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-01-28 18:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-01-29 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-02-01 16:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev15) Patchwork
2021-02-01 16:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-02-01 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-02-01 16:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210128162612.927917-33-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).