intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
	Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, "Raj,
	Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/14] vfio/mbochs: Fix missing error unwind in mbochs_probe()
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:01:27 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210720160127.17bf3c19.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2-v2-b6a5582525c9+ff96-vfio_reflck_jgg@nvidia.com>

On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:42:48 -0300
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:

> Compared to mbochs_remove() two cases are missing from the
> vfio_register_group_dev() unwind. Add them in.
> 
> Fixes: 681c1615f891 ("vfio/mbochs: Convert to use vfio_register_group_dev()")
> Reported-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c b/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
> index e81b875b4d87b4..501845b08c0974 100644
> --- a/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
> +++ b/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
> @@ -553,11 +553,14 @@ static int mbochs_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
>  
>  	ret = vfio_register_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto err_mem;
> +		goto err_bytes;
>  	dev_set_drvdata(&mdev->dev, mdev_state);
>  	return 0;
>  
> +err_bytes:
> +	mbochs_used_mbytes -= mdev_state->type->mbytes;
>  err_mem:
> +	kfree(mdev_state->pages);
>  	kfree(mdev_state->vconfig);
>  	kfree(mdev_state);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -567,8 +570,8 @@ static void mbochs_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
>  {
>  	struct mdev_state *mdev_state = dev_get_drvdata(&mdev->dev);
>  
> -	mbochs_used_mbytes -= mdev_state->type->mbytes;
>  	vfio_unregister_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
> +	mbochs_used_mbytes -= mdev_state->type->mbytes;
>  	kfree(mdev_state->pages);
>  	kfree(mdev_state->vconfig);
>  	kfree(mdev_state);

Hmm, doesn't this suggest we need another atomic conversion?  (untested)

diff --git a/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c b/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
index e81b875b4d87..842819e29c6b 100644
--- a/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
+++ b/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static dev_t		mbochs_devt;
 static struct class	*mbochs_class;
 static struct cdev	mbochs_cdev;
 static struct device	mbochs_dev;
-static int		mbochs_used_mbytes;
+static atomic_t		mbochs_avail_mbytes;
 static const struct vfio_device_ops mbochs_dev_ops;
 
 struct vfio_region_info_ext {
@@ -511,14 +511,19 @@ static int mbochs_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
 		&mbochs_types[mdev_get_type_group_id(mdev)];
 	struct device *dev = mdev_dev(mdev);
 	struct mdev_state *mdev_state;
+	int avail_mbytes = atomic_read(&mbochs_avail_mbytes);
 	int ret = -ENOMEM;
 
-	if (type->mbytes + mbochs_used_mbytes > max_mbytes)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	do {
+		if (avail_mbytes < type->mbytes)
+			return ret;
+	} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&mbochs_avail_mbytes, &avail_mbytes,
+				     avail_mbytes - type->mbytes));
 
 	mdev_state = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mdev_state), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (mdev_state == NULL)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_resv;
+
 	vfio_init_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev, &mdev->dev, &mbochs_dev_ops);
 
 	mdev_state->vconfig = kzalloc(MBOCHS_CONFIG_SPACE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -549,8 +554,6 @@ static int mbochs_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
 	mbochs_create_config_space(mdev_state);
 	mbochs_reset(mdev_state);
 
-	mbochs_used_mbytes += type->mbytes;
-
 	ret = vfio_register_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_mem;
@@ -558,8 +561,11 @@ static int mbochs_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
 	return 0;
 
 err_mem:
+	kfree(mdev_state->pages);
 	kfree(mdev_state->vconfig);
 	kfree(mdev_state);
+err_resv:
+	atomic_add(mdev_state->type->mbytes, &mbochs_avail_mbytes);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -567,11 +573,11 @@ static void mbochs_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
 {
 	struct mdev_state *mdev_state = dev_get_drvdata(&mdev->dev);
 
-	mbochs_used_mbytes -= mdev_state->type->mbytes;
 	vfio_unregister_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
 	kfree(mdev_state->pages);
 	kfree(mdev_state->vconfig);
 	kfree(mdev_state);
+	atomic_add(mdev_state->type->mbytes, &mbochs_avail_mbytes);
 }
 
 static ssize_t mbochs_read(struct vfio_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
@@ -1351,7 +1357,7 @@ static ssize_t available_instances_show(struct mdev_type *mtype,
 {
 	const struct mbochs_type *type =
 		&mbochs_types[mtype_get_type_group_id(mtype)];
-	int count = (max_mbytes - mbochs_used_mbytes) / type->mbytes;
+	int count = atomic_read(&mbochs_avail_mbytes) / type->mbytes;
 
 	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", count);
 }
@@ -1460,6 +1466,8 @@ static int __init mbochs_dev_init(void)
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_class;
 
+	atomic_set(&mbochs_avail_mbytes, max_mbytes);
+
 	ret = mdev_register_device(&mbochs_dev, &mdev_fops);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_device;

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-20 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-20 17:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/14] Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/14] vfio/samples: Remove module get/put Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  7:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/14] vfio/mbochs: Fix missing error unwind in mbochs_probe() Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 22:01   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2021-07-20 22:49     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 22:54       ` Alex Williamson
2021-07-21  9:18       ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-21  9:16   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/14] vfio: Introduce a vfio_uninit_group_dev() API call Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-21 11:33   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-23  7:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/14] vfio: Provide better generic support for open/release vfio_device_ops Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-22 14:42   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-23  7:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23 14:38     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/14] vfio/samples: Delete useless open/close Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  7:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/14] vfio/fsl: Move to the device set infrastructure Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  7:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23 12:22     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 12:29       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23 13:11         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/14] vfio/platform: Use open_device() instead of open coding a refcnt scheme Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-22 14:48   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-23  7:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23 12:23     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/14] vfio/pci: Move to the device set infrastructure Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  7:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23 12:59     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/14] vfio/pci: Change vfio_pci_try_bus_reset() to use the dev_set Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  8:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23 13:30     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/14] vfio/pci: Reorganize VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_HOT_RESET to use the device set Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  8:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23 13:31     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/14] vfio/mbochs: Fix close when multiple device FDs are open Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  8:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/14] vfio/ap, ccw: Fix open/close " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/14] vfio/gvt: " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  8:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-20 17:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/14] vfio: Remove struct vfio_device_ops open/release Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  8:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-20 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release (rev4) Patchwork
2021-07-20 17:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-07-20 18:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-20 19:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-07-20 22:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release (rev5) Patchwork
2021-07-23  9:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release (rev6) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210720160127.17bf3c19.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).