From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create: Provide the function names for proper kerneldoc headers
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 23:18:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202303312304.LMo1KsTB-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230331092607.700644-8-lee@kernel.org>
Hi Lee,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on drm-misc/drm-misc-next next-20230331]
[cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes lee-leds/for-leds-next linus/master v6.3-rc4]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Lee-Jones/drm-i915-i915_scatterlist-Fix-kerneldoc-formatting-issue-missing/20230331-173046
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230331092607.700644-8-lee%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create: Provide the function names for proper kerneldoc headers
config: i386-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230331/202303312304.LMo1KsTB-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-8) 11.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/7c87f97c7f11c1a2b3931d46ae1382c5ee0c14f7
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Lee-Jones/drm-i915-i915_scatterlist-Fix-kerneldoc-formatting-issue-missing/20230331-173046
git checkout 7c87f97c7f11c1a2b3931d46ae1382c5ee0c14f7
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 olddefconfig
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303312304.LMo1KsTB-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c:411: warning: expecting prototype for i915_gem_create_ext_ioct(). Prototype was for i915_gem_create_ext_ioctl() instead
vim +411 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c
ebcb40298947bdb Matthew Auld 2021-04-29 401
ebcb40298947bdb Matthew Auld 2021-04-29 402 /**
7c87f97c7f11c1a Lee Jones 2023-03-31 403 * i915_gem_create_ext_ioct - Creates a new mm object and returns a handle to it.
ebcb40298947bdb Matthew Auld 2021-04-29 404 * @dev: drm device pointer
ebcb40298947bdb Matthew Auld 2021-04-29 405 * @data: ioctl data blob
ebcb40298947bdb Matthew Auld 2021-04-29 406 * @file: drm file pointer
ebcb40298947bdb Matthew Auld 2021-04-29 407 */
ebcb40298947bdb Matthew Auld 2021-04-29 408 int
ebcb40298947bdb Matthew Auld 2021-04-29 409 i915_gem_create_ext_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
ebcb40298947bdb Matthew Auld 2021-04-29 410 struct drm_file *file)
ebcb40298947bdb Matthew Auld 2021-04-29 @411 {
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-31 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230331092607.700644-1-lee@kernel.org>
2023-03-31 9:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915/i915_scatterlist: Fix kerneldoc formatting issue - missing '@' Lee Jones
2023-04-03 15:35 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-03 16:20 ` Lee Jones
2023-04-04 9:44 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-05 13:45 ` Lee Jones
2023-04-05 16:06 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-05 16:41 ` Lee Jones
2023-03-31 9:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/intel_region_ttm: Provide missing description for 'offset' param Lee Jones
2023-03-31 9:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs: Fix incorrect param naming for 'intel_connector' Lee Jones
2023-03-31 9:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs: Fix a couple of incorrectly named functions Lee Jones
2023-03-31 9:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/gt/intel_rps: Demote a kerneldoc abuse for ips_ping_for_i915_load() Lee Jones
2023-03-31 9:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create: Provide the function names for proper kerneldoc headers Lee Jones
2023-03-31 15:18 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-03-31 9:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain: Provide function names to complete proper kerneldoc Lee Jones
2023-03-31 9:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_pm: Provide a couple of missing descriptions for 'flags' and remove some superfluous ones Lee Jones
2023-03-31 9:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm: Demote half-filled kerneldoc Lee Jones
2023-03-31 9:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move: Provide a couple of missing descriptions for 'num_pages' and 'ctx' Lee Jones
2023-03-31 9:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait: Provide function name to validate the kerneldoc header Lee Jones
2023-03-31 9:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object: Demote non-kerneldoc header with no param descriptions Lee Jones
2023-03-31 9:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915/i915_gem: Provide function names to complete the expected kerneldoc format Lee Jones
2023-03-31 17:52 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-31 9:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_hwconfig: Demote a few non-conforming kerneldoc headers Lee Jones
2023-03-31 9:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915/i915_vma: Provide one missing param and demote another non-kerneldoc header Lee Jones
2023-03-31 9:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915/display/intel_display_power: Fix incorrectly documented function __intel_display_power_put_async() Lee Jones
2023-03-31 9:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915/display/intel_wm: Fix a little doc-rot in intel_update_watermarks() Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202303312304.LMo1KsTB-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).