[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Don't capture Gen8 regs on Gen12 devices

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Don't capture Gen8 regs on Gen12 devices

[John.C.Harrison]

From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>

A pair of pre-Gen12 registers were being included in the Gen12 capture
list. GuC was rejecting those as being invalid and logging errors
about them. So, stop doing it.

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Fixes: dce2bd542337 ("drm/i915/guc: Add Gen9 registers for GuC error state capture.")
Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Cc: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
index cf49188db6a6e..e0e793167d61b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
@@ -31,12 +31,14 @@
 	{ FORCEWAKE_MT,             0,      0, "FORCEWAKE" }
 
 #define COMMON_GEN9BASE_GLOBAL \
-	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0" }, \
-	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1" }, \
 	{ ERROR_GEN6,               0,      0, "ERROR_GEN6" }, \
 	{ DONE_REG,                 0,      0, "DONE_REG" }, \
 	{ HSW_GTT_CACHE_EN,         0,      0, "HSW_GTT_CACHE_EN" }
 
+#define GEN9_GLOBAL \
+	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0" }, \
+	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1" }
+
 #define COMMON_GEN12BASE_GLOBAL \
 	{ GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA0,    0,      0, "GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA0" }, \
 	{ GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA1,    0,      0, "GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA1" }, \
@@ -142,6 +144,7 @@ static const struct __guc_mmio_reg_descr xe_lpd_gsc_inst_regs[] = {
 static const struct __guc_mmio_reg_descr default_global_regs[] = {
 	COMMON_BASE_GLOBAL,
 	COMMON_GEN9BASE_GLOBAL,
+	GEN9_GLOBAL,
 };
 
 static const struct __guc_mmio_reg_descr default_rc_class_regs[] = {
-- 
2.39.1

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/guc: Don't capture Gen8 regs on Gen12 devices

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/guc: Don't capture Gen8 regs on Gen12 devices
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/116051/
State : warning

== Summary ==

Error: dim checkpatch failed
c238f339fd40 drm/i915/guc: Don't capture Gen8 regs on Gen12 devices
-:35: ERROR:COMPLEX_MACRO: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
#35: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c:38:
+#define GEN9_GLOBAL \
+	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0" }, \
+	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1" }

total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 23 lines checked

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/guc: Don't capture Gen8 regs on Gen12 devices

[Patchwork]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5516 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/guc: Don't capture Gen8 regs on Gen12 devices
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/116051/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_12961 -> Patchwork_116051v1
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_116051v1 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_116051v1, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116051v1/index.html

Participating hosts (36 -> 36)
------------------------------

  Additional (1): fi-pnv-d510 
  Missing    (1): fi-snb-2520m 

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_116051v1:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt@dmabuf@all-tests@dma_fence:
    - fi-glk-j4005:       [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12961/fi-glk-j4005/igt@dmabuf@all-tests@dma_fence.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116051v1/fi-glk-j4005/igt@dmabuf@all-tests@dma_fence.html

  
Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_116051v1 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@dmabuf@all-tests@sanitycheck:
    - fi-glk-j4005:       [PASS][3] -> [ABORT][4] ([i915#8143])
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12961/fi-glk-j4005/igt@dmabuf@all-tests@sanitycheck.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116051v1/fi-glk-j4005/igt@dmabuf@all-tests@sanitycheck.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@requests:
    - bat-rpls-2:         [PASS][5] -> [ABORT][6] ([i915#7913] / [i915#7982])
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12961/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116051v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html

  * igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915:
    - bat-rpls-1:         [PASS][7] -> [ABORT][8] ([i915#6687] / [i915#7978])
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12961/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116051v1/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence@pipe-c-dp-1:
    - bat-dg2-8:          [PASS][9] -> [FAIL][10] ([i915#7932])
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12961/bat-dg2-8/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence@pipe-c-dp-1.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116051v1/bat-dg2-8/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence@pipe-c-dp-1.html

  * igt@kms_psr@primary_page_flip:
    - fi-pnv-d510:        NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([fdo#109271]) +38 similar issues
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116051v1/fi-pnv-d510/igt@kms_psr@primary_page_flip.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@i915_pm_rps@basic-api:
    - bat-dg2-11:         [FAIL][12] ([i915#8308]) -> [PASS][13]
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12961/bat-dg2-11/igt@i915_pm_rps@basic-api.html
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116051v1/bat-dg2-11/igt@i915_pm_rps@basic-api.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm:
    - bat-rpls-2:         [DMESG-FAIL][14] ([i915#4258]) -> [PASS][15]
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12961/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116051v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@slpc:
    - bat-rpls-1:         [DMESG-FAIL][16] ([i915#6367]) -> [PASS][17]
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12961/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@slpc.html
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116051v1/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@slpc.html

  
  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [i915#4258]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4258
  [i915#6367]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6367
  [i915#6687]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6687
  [i915#7913]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7913
  [i915#7932]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7932
  [i915#7978]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7978
  [i915#7982]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7982
  [i915#8143]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8143
  [i915#8308]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8308


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_12961 -> Patchwork_116051v1

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_12961: 82f1e99798a184af2c21c9c8748f3fba4bdc4556 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_7233: 716520b469a2745e1882780f2aabbc88eb19332c @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
  Patchwork_116051v1: 82f1e99798a184af2c21c9c8748f3fba4bdc4556 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


### Linux commits

89f2ba64d435 drm/i915/guc: Don't capture Gen8 regs on Gen12 devices

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_116051v1/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6356 bytes --]

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Don't capture Gen8 regs on Gen12 devices

[Matt Roper]

On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 02:33:34PM -0700, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> 
> A pair of pre-Gen12 registers were being included in the Gen12 capture
> list. GuC was rejecting those as being invalid and logging errors
> about them. So, stop doing it.

Looks like these registers existed from gen8-gen11.  With this change,
it looks like they also won't be included in the GuC error capture for
gen11 (ICL and EHL/JSL) since those platforms return xe_lpd_lists [1]
rather than default_lists; do we care about that?  I assume not (since
those platforms don't use GuC submission unless you force it with the
enable_guc modparam and taint your kernel), but I figured I should point
it out.

Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>


[1] Why is the main list we use called xe_lpd (i.e., the name of ADL-P's
    display IP)?  It doesn't seem like we're doing anything with display
    registers here so using display IP naming seems really confusing.


Matt

> 
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> Fixes: dce2bd542337 ("drm/i915/guc: Add Gen9 registers for GuC error state capture.")
> Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
> Cc: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
> index cf49188db6a6e..e0e793167d61b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
> @@ -31,12 +31,14 @@
>  	{ FORCEWAKE_MT,             0,      0, "FORCEWAKE" }
>  
>  #define COMMON_GEN9BASE_GLOBAL \
> -	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0" }, \
> -	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1" }, \
>  	{ ERROR_GEN6,               0,      0, "ERROR_GEN6" }, \
>  	{ DONE_REG,                 0,      0, "DONE_REG" }, \
>  	{ HSW_GTT_CACHE_EN,         0,      0, "HSW_GTT_CACHE_EN" }
>  
> +#define GEN9_GLOBAL \
> +	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0" }, \
> +	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1" }
> +
>  #define COMMON_GEN12BASE_GLOBAL \
>  	{ GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA0,    0,      0, "GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA0" }, \
>  	{ GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA1,    0,      0, "GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA1" }, \
> @@ -142,6 +144,7 @@ static const struct __guc_mmio_reg_descr xe_lpd_gsc_inst_regs[] = {
>  static const struct __guc_mmio_reg_descr default_global_regs[] = {
>  	COMMON_BASE_GLOBAL,
>  	COMMON_GEN9BASE_GLOBAL,
> +	GEN9_GLOBAL,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct __guc_mmio_reg_descr default_rc_class_regs[] = {
> -- 
> 2.39.1
> 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Don't capture Gen8 regs on Gen12 devices

[John Harrison]

On 4/3/2023 17:34, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 02:33:34PM -0700, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
>> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>>
>> A pair of pre-Gen12 registers were being included in the Gen12 capture
>> list. GuC was rejecting those as being invalid and logging errors
>> about them. So, stop doing it.
> Looks like these registers existed from gen8-gen11.  With this change,
> it looks like they also won't be included in the GuC error capture for
> gen11 (ICL and EHL/JSL) since those platforms return xe_lpd_lists [1]
> rather than default_lists; do we care about that?  I assume not (since
> those platforms don't use GuC submission unless you force it with the
> enable_guc modparam and taint your kernel), but I figured I should point
> it out.
Yeah, I think the code is treating Gen11 as Gen12 rather than Gen9 or 
it's own thing. I hadn't spotted that before. It certainly seems incorrect.

>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>
>
> [1] Why is the main list we use called xe_lpd (i.e., the name of ADL-P's
>      display IP)?  It doesn't seem like we're doing anything with display
>      registers here so using display IP naming seems really confusing.
I think because no-one has a clue what name refers to what hardware any 
more :(.

What are the official names for IP_VER 9, 11, 12.00, 12.50 and 12.55?

John.

>
>
> Matt
>
>> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>> Fixes: dce2bd542337 ("drm/i915/guc: Add Gen9 registers for GuC error state capture.")
>> Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
>> Cc: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>> Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
>> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c | 7 +++++--
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
>> index cf49188db6a6e..e0e793167d61b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
>> @@ -31,12 +31,14 @@
>>   	{ FORCEWAKE_MT,             0,      0, "FORCEWAKE" }
>>   
>>   #define COMMON_GEN9BASE_GLOBAL \
>> -	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0" }, \
>> -	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1" }, \
>>   	{ ERROR_GEN6,               0,      0, "ERROR_GEN6" }, \
>>   	{ DONE_REG,                 0,      0, "DONE_REG" }, \
>>   	{ HSW_GTT_CACHE_EN,         0,      0, "HSW_GTT_CACHE_EN" }
>>   
>> +#define GEN9_GLOBAL \
>> +	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0" }, \
>> +	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1" }
>> +
>>   #define COMMON_GEN12BASE_GLOBAL \
>>   	{ GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA0,    0,      0, "GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA0" }, \
>>   	{ GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA1,    0,      0, "GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA1" }, \
>> @@ -142,6 +144,7 @@ static const struct __guc_mmio_reg_descr xe_lpd_gsc_inst_regs[] = {
>>   static const struct __guc_mmio_reg_descr default_global_regs[] = {
>>   	COMMON_BASE_GLOBAL,
>>   	COMMON_GEN9BASE_GLOBAL,
>> +	GEN9_GLOBAL,
>>   };
>>   
>>   static const struct __guc_mmio_reg_descr default_rc_class_regs[] = {
>> -- 
>> 2.39.1
>>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Don't capture Gen8 regs on Gen12 devices

[Matt Roper]

On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 02:13:31PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
> On 4/3/2023 17:34, Matt Roper wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 02:33:34PM -0700, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
> > > From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> > > 
> > > A pair of pre-Gen12 registers were being included in the Gen12 capture
> > > list. GuC was rejecting those as being invalid and logging errors
> > > about them. So, stop doing it.
> > Looks like these registers existed from gen8-gen11.  With this change,
> > it looks like they also won't be included in the GuC error capture for
> > gen11 (ICL and EHL/JSL) since those platforms return xe_lpd_lists [1]
> > rather than default_lists; do we care about that?  I assume not (since
> > those platforms don't use GuC submission unless you force it with the
> > enable_guc modparam and taint your kernel), but I figured I should point
> > it out.
> Yeah, I think the code is treating Gen11 as Gen12 rather than Gen9 or it's
> own thing. I hadn't spotted that before. It certainly seems incorrect.
> 
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> > 
> > 
> > [1] Why is the main list we use called xe_lpd (i.e., the name of ADL-P's
> >      display IP)?  It doesn't seem like we're doing anything with display
> >      registers here so using display IP naming seems really confusing.
> I think because no-one has a clue what name refers to what hardware any more
> :(.
> 
> What are the official names for IP_VER 9, 11, 12.00, 12.50 and 12.55?

Yeah, the naming is a real mess.  :-(  For graphics IP, the official
terms are supposed to be:

12.00 = Xe_LP
12.10 = Xe_LP+ (basically the same as Xe_LP except for interrupts)
12.50 = Xe_HP
12.55 = Xe_HPG (it's nearly identical to Xe_HP)
12.7x = Xe_LPG

There are separate names for media, although we didn't really start
using them anywhere in the i915 until the separation of IPs started
becoming more important with MTL:

12.00 = Xe_M (or Xe_M+ for DG1, but we treat it the same in the KMD)
12.50 = Xe_XPM
12.55 = Xe_HPM
12.60 = Xe_XPM+
13.00 = Xe_LPM+

and display:

12.00 = Xe_D
13.00 = Xe_LPD (ADL-P) or Xe_HPD (DG2)
14.00 = Xe_LPD+


The pre-12 stuff predates the fancy new marketing-mandated names.  Even
though we're not using "gen" terminology going forward, those old ones
are grandfathered in, so it's still okay to refer to them as gen9,
gen11, etc.


Matt

> 
> John.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Matt
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> > > Fixes: dce2bd542337 ("drm/i915/guc: Add Gen9 registers for GuC error state capture.")
> > > Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> > > Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c | 7 +++++--
> > >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
> > > index cf49188db6a6e..e0e793167d61b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
> > > @@ -31,12 +31,14 @@
> > >   	{ FORCEWAKE_MT,             0,      0, "FORCEWAKE" }
> > >   #define COMMON_GEN9BASE_GLOBAL \
> > > -	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0" }, \
> > > -	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1" }, \
> > >   	{ ERROR_GEN6,               0,      0, "ERROR_GEN6" }, \
> > >   	{ DONE_REG,                 0,      0, "DONE_REG" }, \
> > >   	{ HSW_GTT_CACHE_EN,         0,      0, "HSW_GTT_CACHE_EN" }
> > > +#define GEN9_GLOBAL \
> > > +	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA0" }, \
> > > +	{ GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1,     0,      0, "GEN8_FAULT_TLB_DATA1" }
> > > +
> > >   #define COMMON_GEN12BASE_GLOBAL \
> > >   	{ GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA0,    0,      0, "GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA0" }, \
> > >   	{ GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA1,    0,      0, "GEN12_FAULT_TLB_DATA1" }, \
> > > @@ -142,6 +144,7 @@ static const struct __guc_mmio_reg_descr xe_lpd_gsc_inst_regs[] = {
> > >   static const struct __guc_mmio_reg_descr default_global_regs[] = {
> > >   	COMMON_BASE_GLOBAL,
> > >   	COMMON_GEN9BASE_GLOBAL,
> > > +	GEN9_GLOBAL,
> > >   };
> > >   static const struct __guc_mmio_reg_descr default_rc_class_regs[] = {
> > > -- 
> > > 2.39.1
> > > 
> 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation