intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0
@ 2012-08-10 10:37 Zhigang Gong
  2012-08-10 15:58 ` Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Zhigang Gong @ 2012-08-10 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glamor, intel-gfx, xorg


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8201 bytes --]

After three moths development, I’m pleased to release glamor version 0.5.0.
The major improvements

are as below:

 

1.       Support tiling large pixmap to multiple small textures.

2.       Enable gradient shader.

3.       Optimize glyphs rendering performance

4.       Implement first shader to generate trapezoids.

 

Cairo-demo’s spinner on a large picture(12000x12000) get about 10x
improvement, and gradient also

get about 2x improvement. Aa10text and rgb10text also get about 2x
improvement.

 

Thanks for Junyan and Michel’s contribution.

 

Glamor has a restriction with latest xserver. The main issue is that glamor
rely on the module loading

sequence which is not guaranteed by current xserver. We will fix this issue
in next version. If you want

to try a full functional xserver with glamor, it’s recommended to use the
following xserver version:

commit a615b90cab7569fae9d123e4da1d3373c871d84b

Author: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>

Date:   Wed Mar 14 11:32:36 2012 -0700

 

    Bump version number to 1.12.99.0

 

    Now that 1.12 has branched, reset the version on master to a

    development number.

 

            Signed-off-by: Keith Packard keithp@keithp.com

 

We have the following work items for next release:

 

1.       Fix the coexisting problem with glx for latest xserver. Don’t rely
on the module loading sequence.

2.       Continue performance tuning:

a)         Implement delay flushing mechanism to avoid tiny drawing
operation for each DrawElements/DrawArrays call.

b)         Implement atlas for small pixmap.

c)         Optimize trapezoid shader to reduce the overhead for those
non-edge pixels.

d)         Optimize trapezoid/gradient shader to merge the mask/source
creation and compositing into one shader.

e)         Optimize glamor itself’ overhead.

3.       Xv support.

 

The following changes since commit d5cdad0497ae5f6cd936a74f68169c0910ea1e68:

 

  Release 0.4. (2012-04-28 17:02:35 +0800)

 

are available in the git repository at:

 

git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/glamor

tag v0.5

 

tar ball is at:

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/glamor/snapshot/glamor-0.5.tar.gz

 

Please refer the following wiki page for how to try glamor with Intel
driver.

http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Glamor

 

for you to fetch changes up to 9b8a791290af0add84269efdb315f9f58798f6d2:

 

  Bump to version 0.5. (2012-08-10 13:46:42 +0800)

 

----------------------------------------------------------------

Junyan He (14):

      Extract the gradient related code out.

      Fix a bugy macro definition.

      Fix the problem of set the same stop several times.

      Fix the problem of vertical and horizontal case error in linear
gradient.

      Fix the problem of x_source and y_source causing radial error

      Add macro of vertex setting for triangle stripe

      Modilfy the composite logic to two phases

      Add the trapezoid direct render logic

      Use the direct render path for A1

      Fix a bug for trapezoid clip

      Change the trapezoid render to use VBO.

      Just use the shader to generate trapezoid if PolyMode == Imprecise

      Fix the problem of VBO leak.

      Fallback to pixman when trapezoid mask is big.

 

Michel Dänzer (4):

      Fix translation of clip region for composite fallback.

      Stream vertex data to VBOs.

      Print space between name of missing EGL extension and 'required'.

      Prefer KHR_surfaceless_context EGL extension over
KHR_surfaceless_opengl/gles2.

 

RobinHe (2):

      Create the file glamor_triangles.c

      Use shader to generate the temp trapezoid mask

 

Zhigang Gong (43):

      We should not call gradient finalization code if we disable it.

      Added strict warning flags to CFLAGS.

      Remove the texture cache code.

      glamor_set_destination_pixmap_priv_nc: set drawable's width x height.

      glamor_largepixmap: first commit for large pixmap.

      largepixmap: Implement infrastructure for large pixmap.

      largepixmap: Enable glamor_composite.

      glamor_putimage: Correct the wrong stride value.

      glamor_getimage: should call miGetimage if failed to get sub-image.

      largepixmap: Add transform/repeat/reflect/pad support.

      largepixmap: Support self composite for large pixmap.

      largepixmap: Fix the selfcopy issue.

      Enable large pixmap by default.

      trapezoid: Fallback to sw-rasterize for largepixmap.

      copyarea: Cleanup the error handling logic.

      glamor_glyphs: Before get upload to cache flush is needed.

      glamor_emit_composite_vert: Optimize to don't do two times vert
coping.

      gles2_largepixmap: force clip for a non-large pixmap.

      glamor_fbo: fix a memory leak for large pixmap.

      glamor_create_pixmap: Allocate glyphs pixmap in memory.

      glamor_render: Don't fallback when rendering glyphs with OpOver.

      glamor_glyphs: Detect fake or real glyphs overlap.

      glamor_composite_glyph: Optimize glyphs with non-solid pattern.

      glamor_render: Optimize the two pass ca rendering.

      glamor_largepixmap: Walkaround for large texture's upload.

      glamor_render: Don't allocate buffer for vbo each time.

      glamor_glyphs: Slightly performance tuning.

      glamor_copyarea: Fixed a bug introduced by 996194...

      create_pixmap: use texture for large glyphs.

      optimize: Use likely and unlikely.

      glamor_compositerects: Implement optimized version.

      glamor_glyphs: Use cache picture to store mask picture if possible.

      glamor_copyarea: Use blitcopy if current state is not render.

      glamor_glyphs: Don't merge extents for different lists.

      gles2: Fixed the compilation problem and some bugs.

      Synch with xorg 1.13 change.

      Added the missed header file for xorg 1.13 compat.

      glamor_trapezoid: workaround a glsl like problem.

      glamor_glyphs: When dst arg point to a NULL buffer, dont't flush.

      glamor_largepixmap: Fixed a bug in repeat clipping.

      Silence compilation warnings.

      Increase vbo size to 64K verts.

      Bump to version 0.5.

 

configure.ac                |    2 +-

src/Makefile.am             |    6 +-

src/compat-api.h            |  107 ++

src/compiler.h              |   59 +

src/glamor.c                |   98 +-

src/glamor.h                |   16 +-

src/glamor_compositerects.c |  278 +++++

src/glamor_copyarea.c       |  356 ++++--

src/glamor_copyplane.c      |    3 -

src/glamor_core.c           |   26 +-

src/glamor_debug.h          |    4 +-

src/glamor_egl.c            |   61 +-

src/glamor_eglmodule.c      |    4 +-

src/glamor_fbo.c            |  274 ++--

src/glamor_fill.c           |  173 ++-

src/glamor_fillspans.c      |    3 -

src/glamor_getimage.c       |    4 +-

src/glamor_glext.h          |    3 +

src/glamor_glyphs.c         | 1452 +++++++++++++++++----

src/glamor_gradient.c       | 1584 +++++++++++++++++++++++

src/glamor_largepixmap.c    | 1324 ++++++++++++++++++++

src/glamor_picture.c        |   16 +-

src/glamor_pixmap.c         |  441 +++++--

src/glamor_polyfillrect.c   |    3 -

src/glamor_polylines.c      |    2 -

src/glamor_priv.h           |  363 +++++-

src/glamor_putimage.c       |    8 +-

src/glamor_render.c         | 2912
+++++++++++--------------------------------

src/glamor_tile.c           |  202 ++-

src/glamor_trapezoid.c      | 1810 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++

src/glamor_utils.h          |  841 +++++++++++--

src/glapi.h                 |    6 +-

32 files changed, 9338 insertions(+), 3103 deletions(-) 

create mode 100644 src/compat-api.h

create mode 100644 src/compiler.h

create mode 100644 src/glamor_compositerects.c

create mode 100644 src/glamor_gradient.c

create mode 100644 src/glamor_largepixmap.c

create mode 100644 src/glamor_trapezoid.c

 


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 27670 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0
  2012-08-10 10:37 [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0 Zhigang Gong
@ 2012-08-10 15:58 ` Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
  2012-08-10 16:54   ` Alex Deucher
  2012-08-12  8:17   ` Zhigang Gong
  2012-08-11  8:55 ` Netiquette: No HTML messages please. (was: [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0) Paul Menzel
  2012-08-21  4:51 ` [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0 Rémi Cardona
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia @ 2012-08-10 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhigang Gong; +Cc: Junyan He, intel-gfx, xorg, Zou, Nanhai, glamor


On Aug 10, 2012, at 03:37, Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> to try a full functional xserver with glamor, it’s recommended to use the
> following xserver version:
> 
> commit a615b90cab7569fae9d123e4da1d3373c871d84b
> 
> Author: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
> 
> Date:   Wed Mar 14 11:32:36 2012 -0700
> 
> 
> 
>    Bump version number to 1.12.99.0
> 
> 
> 
>    Now that 1.12 has branched, reset the version on master to a
> 
>    development number.
> 


Why is such an old server version recommended?  Surely tip of server-1.12-branch is superior to this branch point+1 on master?  And I'd really expect tip of master to be a better candidate than that given the development nature of glamor.  Can you please clarify?

Thanks,
Jeremy

_______________________________________________
xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: gcfx-xorg-2@m.gmane.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0
  2012-08-10 15:58 ` Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
@ 2012-08-10 16:54   ` Alex Deucher
  2012-08-10 16:59     ` Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
  2012-08-12  8:17   ` Zhigang Gong
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alex Deucher @ 2012-08-10 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
  Cc: intel-gfx, xorg, Junyan He, Zhigang Gong, glamor, Zou, Nanhai

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
<jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> wrote:
>
> On Aug 10, 2012, at 03:37, Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> to try a full functional xserver with glamor, it’s recommended to use the
>> following xserver version:
>>
>> commit a615b90cab7569fae9d123e4da1d3373c871d84b
>>
>> Author: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
>>
>> Date:   Wed Mar 14 11:32:36 2012 -0700
>>
>>
>>
>>    Bump version number to 1.12.99.0
>>
>>
>>
>>    Now that 1.12 has branched, reset the version on master to a
>>
>>    development number.
>>
>
>
> Why is such an old server version recommended?  Surely tip of server-1.12-branch is superior to this branch point+1 on master?  And I'd really expect tip of master to be a better candidate than that given the development nature of glamor.  Can you please clarify?

That should be fine.  The commit is question is just the most recent
commit on master that still works prior to the changes that broke the
module ordering that broke glamor.

Alex
_______________________________________________
xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: gcfx-xorg-2@m.gmane.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0
  2012-08-10 16:54   ` Alex Deucher
@ 2012-08-10 16:59     ` Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
  2012-08-10 17:02       ` Alex Deucher
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia @ 2012-08-10 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Deucher
  Cc: intel-gfx, xorg, Junyan He, Zhigang Gong, glamor, Zou, Nanhai


On Aug 10, 2012, at 09:54, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
> <jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Aug 10, 2012, at 03:37, Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> to try a full functional xserver with glamor, it’s recommended to use the
>>> following xserver version:
>>> 
>>> commit a615b90cab7569fae9d123e4da1d3373c871d84b
>>> 
>>> Author: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
>>> 
>>> Date:   Wed Mar 14 11:32:36 2012 -0700
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   Bump version number to 1.12.99.0
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   Now that 1.12 has branched, reset the version on master to a
>>> 
>>>   development number.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Why is such an old server version recommended?  Surely tip of server-1.12-branch is superior to this branch point+1 on master?  And I'd really expect tip of master to be a better candidate than that given the development nature of glamor.  Can you please clarify?
> 
> That should be fine.  The commit is question is just the most recent
> commit on master that still works prior to the changes that broke the
> module ordering that broke glamor.

I think you're mistaken.  The commit referenced is just xorg-server-1.12.0 + version change.  It is significantly before the module loading changes.
_______________________________________________
xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: gcfx-xorg-2@m.gmane.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0
  2012-08-10 16:59     ` Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
@ 2012-08-10 17:02       ` Alex Deucher
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alex Deucher @ 2012-08-10 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
  Cc: intel-gfx, xorg, Junyan He, Zhigang Gong, glamor, Zou, Nanhai

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
<jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> wrote:
>
> On Aug 10, 2012, at 09:54, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
>> <jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 10, 2012, at 03:37, Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> to try a full functional xserver with glamor, it’s recommended to use the
>>>> following xserver version:
>>>>
>>>> commit a615b90cab7569fae9d123e4da1d3373c871d84b
>>>>
>>>> Author: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
>>>>
>>>> Date:   Wed Mar 14 11:32:36 2012 -0700
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   Bump version number to 1.12.99.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   Now that 1.12 has branched, reset the version on master to a
>>>>
>>>>   development number.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Why is such an old server version recommended?  Surely tip of server-1.12-branch is superior to this branch point+1 on master?  And I'd really expect tip of master to be a better candidate than that given the development nature of glamor.  Can you please clarify?
>>
>> That should be fine.  The commit is question is just the most recent
>> commit on master that still works prior to the changes that broke the
>> module ordering that broke glamor.
>
> I think you're mistaken.  The commit referenced is just xorg-server-1.12.0 + version change.  It is significantly before the module loading changes.

That was just an uneducated guess on my part.  Glamor does work on
older xservers...  I'll shut up now.

Alex
_______________________________________________
xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: gcfx-xorg-2@m.gmane.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Netiquette: No HTML messages please. (was: [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0)
  2012-08-10 10:37 [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0 Zhigang Gong
  2012-08-10 15:58 ` Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
@ 2012-08-11  8:55 ` Paul Menzel
  2012-08-12  8:24   ` Zhigang Gong
  2012-08-21  4:51 ` [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0 Rémi Cardona
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paul Menzel @ 2012-08-11  8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhigang Gong; +Cc: intel-gfx, xorg, glamor


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 233 bytes --]

Dear Zhigang,


thank you for the announcement message and congratulations on the
release. But please do not send HTML messages to lists [1]!


Thanks,

Paul


[1] http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Mailing_list_netiquette

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0
  2012-08-10 15:58 ` Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
  2012-08-10 16:54   ` Alex Deucher
@ 2012-08-12  8:17   ` Zhigang Gong
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Zhigang Gong @ 2012-08-12  8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia; +Cc: intel-gfx, xorg, glamor

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:58:33AM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
> 
> On Aug 10, 2012, at 03:37, Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > to try a full functional xserver with glamor, it’s recommended to use the
> > following xserver version:
> > 
> > commit a615b90cab7569fae9d123e4da1d3373c871d84b
> > 
> > Author: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
> > 
> > Date:   Wed Mar 14 11:32:36 2012 -0700
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >    Bump version number to 1.12.99.0
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >    Now that 1.12 has branched, reset the version on master to a
> > 
> >    development number.
> > 
> 
> 
> Why is such an old server version recommended?  Surely tip of server-1.12-branch is superior to this branch point+1 on master?  And I'd really expect tip of master to be a better candidate than that given the development nature of glamor.  Can you please clarify?

This version is what I'm used to do the last round testing, so I recommended it
in the announcement. Actually, glamor 0.5.0 is also compatible with the tip of
server-1.12-branch. I just not do fully testing with it but it should work fine.

As to the master branch, glamor 0.5.0 is not compatible with it since the following
commit:

   a1d41e...: Move extension initialisation prototypes into extinit.

The last compatible version is at commit b86aa74...

As to the reason why glamor can't work with tip ot master, please refer:
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-July/032597.html.

BTW, to fix that issue is the first to do item for next version glamor.

Thanks,
Zhigang

> 
> Thanks,
> Jeremy
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Netiquette: No HTML messages please. (was: [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0)
  2012-08-11  8:55 ` Netiquette: No HTML messages please. (was: [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0) Paul Menzel
@ 2012-08-12  8:24   ` Zhigang Gong
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Zhigang Gong @ 2012-08-12  8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Menzel; +Cc: intel-gfx, xorg, glamor

On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:55:08AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Zhigang,
> 
> 
> thank you for the announcement message and congratulations on the
> release. But please do not send HTML messages to lists [1]!

Thanks for pointing this out. Actually, I was not aware of that I
sent any non plain-text messages. The email client did some auto
formating for me :(. I will check the message more carefully next
time.

Thanks,
Zhigang

> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> [1] http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Mailing_list_netiquette


_______________________________________________
xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: gcfx-xorg-2@m.gmane.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0
  2012-08-10 10:37 [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0 Zhigang Gong
  2012-08-10 15:58 ` Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
  2012-08-11  8:55 ` Netiquette: No HTML messages please. (was: [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0) Paul Menzel
@ 2012-08-21  4:51 ` Rémi Cardona
  2012-08-21  6:31   ` zhigang gong
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rémi Cardona @ 2012-08-21  4:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xorg, intel-gfx, glamor

Hi Zhigang,

Le vendredi 10 août 2012 à 18:37 +0800, Zhigang Gong a écrit :
> tar ball is at:
> 
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/glamor/snapshot/glamor-0.5.tar.gz

This is a git snapshot, not a tarball made using automake's "make dist"
like all X.org modules use.

Is one planned?

Cheers,

Rémi

_______________________________________________
xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: gcfx-xorg-2@m.gmane.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0
  2012-08-21  4:51 ` [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0 Rémi Cardona
@ 2012-08-21  6:31   ` zhigang gong
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: zhigang gong @ 2012-08-21  6:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rémi Cardona; +Cc: intel-gfx, glamor, xorg

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Rémi Cardona <remi@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Hi Zhigang,
>
> Le vendredi 10 août 2012 à 18:37 +0800, Zhigang Gong a écrit :
>> tar ball is at:
>>
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/glamor/snapshot/glamor-0.5.tar.gz
>
> This is a git snapshot, not a tarball made using automake's "make dist"
> like all X.org modules use.

I forgot to make and upload the tarballs. Thanks for your reminder.
>
> Is one planned?

sure, here you are.

git tag: glamor-egl-0.5.0

http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/driver/glamor-egl-0.5.0.tar.bz2
MD5:  7dc2b4e0d8d286531c433893945a3837  glamor-egl-0.5.0.tar.bz2
SHA1: 6495d1a2054e2a8e0f7e01bc7e3345cd50d21972  glamor-egl-0.5.0.tar.bz2
SHA256: 5dc8679ccb3e42bf431b6316c7907b9df2db89745d523e04721f34aee6c84991
 glamor-egl-0.5.0.tar.bz2

http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/driver/glamor-egl-0.5.0.tar.gz
MD5:  8f8f58cbf661a6eb70785864ebf5153f  glamor-egl-0.5.0.tar.gz
SHA1: 08366dd52b5f5812847f20a1252a86100766f8ab  glamor-egl-0.5.0.tar.gz
SHA256: e7ed6ead72a44bcd68d837eb5bf133f760be1e5fb42907cf1bb06ba5f4d6dc18
 glamor-egl-0.5.0.tar.gz

>
> Cheers,
>
> Rémi
>
> _______________________________________________
> xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support
> Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
> Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
> Your subscription address: zhigang.gong@gmail.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-21  6:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-10 10:37 [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0 Zhigang Gong
2012-08-10 15:58 ` Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
2012-08-10 16:54   ` Alex Deucher
2012-08-10 16:59     ` Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
2012-08-10 17:02       ` Alex Deucher
2012-08-12  8:17   ` Zhigang Gong
2012-08-11  8:55 ` Netiquette: No HTML messages please. (was: [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0) Paul Menzel
2012-08-12  8:24   ` Zhigang Gong
2012-08-21  4:51 ` [ANNOUNCE] glamor 0.5.0 Rémi Cardona
2012-08-21  6:31   ` zhigang gong

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).