* Re: [Intel-gfx] [Regression] drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC alone creates issues in stable kernels [not found] ` <a0be2b31-9e72-1254-978e-570b27abb364@manjaro.org> @ 2023-03-20 13:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2023-03-21 0:58 ` Philip Müller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-03-20 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philip Müller; +Cc: intel-gfx, Chris Wilson, stable, Rodrigo Vivi On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:01:01AM +0700, Philip Müller wrote: > Have to correct the affected kernels to these: 4.14.310, 4.19.278, 5.4.237, > 5.10.175 Please don't top-post :( Anyway, should be fixed in the next round of releases in a few days, if not, please let us know. greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [Regression] drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC alone creates issues in stable kernels 2023-03-20 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [Regression] drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC alone creates issues in stable kernels Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-03-21 0:58 ` Philip Müller 2023-03-21 7:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Philip Müller @ 2023-03-21 0:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: intel-gfx, Chris Wilson, stable, Rodrigo Vivi On 20.03.23 20:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:01:01AM +0700, Philip Müller wrote: >> Have to correct the affected kernels to these: 4.14.310, 4.19.278, 5.4.237, >> 5.10.175 > > Please don't top-post :( > > Anyway, should be fixed in the next round of releases in a few days, if > not, please let us know. > > greg k-h Hi Greg, seems the RCs work out. 4.19.279-rc1 and 5.10.176-rc1 were tested by a user who had the issue on i915. In 5.15 series the drm patch got reverted. I only see "drm/i915: Don't use stolen memory for ring buffers with LLC" there as "drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC" was reverted with 5.15.101. -- Best, Philip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [Regression] drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC alone creates issues in stable kernels 2023-03-21 0:58 ` Philip Müller @ 2023-03-21 7:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2023-03-21 12:16 ` Philip Müller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-03-21 7:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philip Müller; +Cc: intel-gfx, Chris Wilson, stable, Rodrigo Vivi On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 07:58:44AM +0700, Philip Müller wrote: > On 20.03.23 20:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:01:01AM +0700, Philip Müller wrote: > > > Have to correct the affected kernels to these: 4.14.310, 4.19.278, 5.4.237, > > > 5.10.175 > > > > Please don't top-post :( > > > > Anyway, should be fixed in the next round of releases in a few days, if > > not, please let us know. > > > > greg k-h > > Hi Greg, > > seems the RCs work out. 4.19.279-rc1 and 5.10.176-rc1 were tested by a user > who had the issue on i915. In 5.15 series the drm patch got reverted. I only > see "drm/i915: Don't use stolen memory for ring buffers with LLC" there as > "drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC" was reverted > with 5.15.101. So is 5.15.y ok or not? Sorry, I could not parse your response here. thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [Regression] drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC alone creates issues in stable kernels 2023-03-21 7:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-03-21 12:16 ` Philip Müller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Philip Müller @ 2023-03-21 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: intel-gfx, Chris Wilson, stable, Rodrigo Vivi On 21.03.23 14:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 07:58:44AM +0700, Philip Müller wrote: >> On 20.03.23 20:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:01:01AM +0700, Philip Müller wrote: >>>> Have to correct the affected kernels to these: 4.14.310, 4.19.278, 5.4.237, >>>> 5.10.175 >>> >>> Please don't top-post :( >>> >>> Anyway, should be fixed in the next round of releases in a few days, if >>> not, please let us know. >>> >>> greg k-h >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> seems the RCs work out. 4.19.279-rc1 and 5.10.176-rc1 were tested by a user >> who had the issue on i915. In 5.15 series the drm patch got reverted. I only >> see "drm/i915: Don't use stolen memory for ring buffers with LLC" there as >> "drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC" was reverted >> with 5.15.101. > > So is 5.15.y ok or not? Sorry, I could not parse your response here. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Hi Greg, yes, 5.15.y seems to work. You could even re-add the reverted patch from 5.15.101 as we also have tested with it applied on top of 5.15.104-rc1. -- Best, Philip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-22 20:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <8a1bbe56-4463-d18d-d5a9-d249171a569d@manjaro.org>
[not found] ` <a0be2b31-9e72-1254-978e-570b27abb364@manjaro.org>
2023-03-20 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [Regression] drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC alone creates issues in stable kernels Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-21 0:58 ` Philip Müller
2023-03-21 7:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-21 12:16 ` Philip Müller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).