intel-wired-lan.lists.osuosl.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ruinskiy, Dima" <dima.ruinskiy@intel.com>
To: "Lifshits, Vitaly" <vitaly.lifshits@intel.com>,
	"intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org>
Cc: "Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1 1/1] e1000e: change usleep_range to udelay in PHY mdic access
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 09:50:19 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c48225ba-e059-401a-2591-bd2cf55a014d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240417190320.3159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@intel.com>

On 17/04/2024 22:03, Lifshits, Vitaly wrote:
> This is a partial revert of commit 6dbdd4de0362 ("e1000e: Workaround
> for sporadic MDI error on Meteor Lake systems"). The referenced commit
> introduced an issue on vPro systems, where disconnecting and reconnecting
> the LAN cable might result in a kernel panic.
> 
> This was root caused to the usage of usleep_range in an atomic content
> while trying to access the PHY. Change back the usleep_range calls to
> udelay.
> 
> Fixes: 6dbdd4de0362 ("e1000e: Workaround for sporadic MDI error on Meteor Lake systems")
> Co-developed-by: Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Lifshits <vitaly.lifshits@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c | 8 ++++----
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c
> index 93544f1cc2a5..f7ae0e0aa4a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ s32 e1000e_read_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data)
>                   * the lower time out
>                   */
>                  for (i = 0; i < (E1000_GEN_POLL_TIMEOUT * 3); i++) {
> -                       usleep_range(50, 60);
> +                       udelay(50);
>                          mdic = er32(MDIC);
>                          if (mdic & E1000_MDIC_READY)
>                                  break;
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ s32 e1000e_read_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data)
>                   * reading duplicate data in the next MDIC transaction.
>                   */
>                  if (hw->mac.type == e1000_pch2lan)
> -                       usleep_range(100, 150);
> +                       udelay(100);
> 
>                  if (success) {
>                          *data = (u16)mdic;
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ s32 e1000e_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data)
>                   * the lower time out
>                   */
>                  for (i = 0; i < (E1000_GEN_POLL_TIMEOUT * 3); i++) {
> -                       usleep_range(50, 60);
> +                       udelay(50);
>                          mdic = er32(MDIC);
>                          if (mdic & E1000_MDIC_READY)
>                                  break;
> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ s32 e1000e_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data)
>                   * reading duplicate data in the next MDIC transaction.
>                   */
>                  if (hw->mac.type == e1000_pch2lan)
> -                       usleep_range(100, 150);
> +                       udelay(100);
> 
>                  if (success)
>                          return 0;
> --
> 2.34.1
> 

Tested-by: Dima Ruinskiy <dima.ruinskiy@intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-24  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-17 19:03 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1 1/1] e1000e: change usleep_range to udelay in PHY mdic access Vitaly Lifshits
2024-04-24  6:50 ` Ruinskiy, Dima [this message]
2024-04-24  8:30 ` Paul Menzel
2024-04-26  6:25 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-30  7:45 ` Jiri Slaby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c48225ba-e059-401a-2591-bd2cf55a014d@intel.com \
    --to=dima.ruinskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
    --cc=sasha.neftin@intel.com \
    --cc=vitaly.lifshits@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).