kernel-hardening.lists.openwall.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* CVE Proofs of Concept
@ 2022-03-19 12:10 Derrick McKee
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Derrick McKee @ 2022-03-19 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernel-hardening; +Cc: linux-hardening

Hello,

I am a Ph.D. student at Purdue University researching kernel
compartmentalization.  I am currently conducting evaluation for a
follow-up paper to one published at NDSS 22 titled 'Preventing Kernel
Hacks with HAKC' (see [1]).  We are interested in empirically
evaluating our compartmentalization policies by determining if targets
of exploits (which we refer to as exploit sinks) are placed in a
different compartment from code that accesses the target (which we
refer to as exploit sources).

To that end, we are looking for a set of kernel exploit proofs of
concept that we can execute and examine.  I realize such a set could
be sensitive, and I will follow all safety procedures in the handling
and execution of any PoC.  In lieu of a set of PoCs, are there any
statistics of kernel structures that are targeted by attackers?  I
would imagine, for example, that struct cred would be heavily
targeted, but how often and what other kernel structures are targeted
would be invaluable.  Thank you for any insight you might have.

[1] https://www.ndss-symposium.org/ndss2022/accepted-papers/


-- 
Derrick McKee
Phone: (703) 957-9362
Email: derrick.mckee@gmail.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-03-19 12:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-19 12:10 CVE Proofs of Concept Derrick McKee

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).