From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@idt.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] powerpc/fsl_rio: fix a missing error code
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:16:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160804131600.bd2f72d2a0a6d8deec0af79b@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160804053525.GM775@mwanda>
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 08:35:25 +0300 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> We should set the error code here. Otherwise static checkers complain.
>
hm.
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c
> @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ int fsl_rio_setup(struct platform_device *dev)
> rmu_node = of_parse_phandle(dev->dev.of_node, "fsl,srio-rmu-handle", 0);
> if (!rmu_node) {
> dev_err(&dev->dev, "No valid fsl,srio-rmu-handle property\n");
> + rc = -ENOENT;
> goto err_rmu;
> }
> rc = of_address_to_resource(rmu_node, 0, &rmu_regs);
afaict the function will return 0 in this case, which is a flat out
bug. But why do static checkers complain? The code will return a
suitably initialized value?
IOW, please always quote the checker/compiler output when fixing a bug!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-04 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-04 5:35 [patch] powerpc/fsl_rio: fix a missing error code Dan Carpenter
2016-08-04 20:16 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2016-08-05 20:28 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160804131600.bd2f72d2a0a6d8deec0af79b@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexandre.bounine@idt.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).