kernel-tls-handshake.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/18] nvme-tcp: enable TLS handshake upcall
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 12:28:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaa05f01-5047-03ed-2356-2f9544ee4b22@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3c2fd60-b09c-6dd4-86f1-1c1e5b371ff4@grimberg.me>

On 4/18/23 12:12, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
>>>   --- a/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c
>>>> @@ -609,6 +609,7 @@ static const match_table_t opt_tokens = {
>>>>       { NVMF_OPT_DISCOVERY,        "discovery"        },
>>>>       { NVMF_OPT_DHCHAP_SECRET,    "dhchap_secret=%s"    },
>>>>       { NVMF_OPT_DHCHAP_CTRL_SECRET,    "dhchap_ctrl_secret=%s"    },
>>>> +    { NVMF_OPT_TLS,            "tls"            },
>>>>       { NVMF_OPT_ERR,            NULL            }
>>>>   };
>>>
>>> Coming back to your previous discussion about this. 'tls' is always 
>>> announced
>>> but not always supported. This renders the unsupported option 
>>> filtering added to
>>> libnvme useles:
>>>
>>>    https://github.com/linux-nvme/libnvme/issues/612
>>>
>>> Let's assume we go ahead with this patch. The user set explicit the 
>>> tls option
>>> via 'nvme connect ... --tls' and the kernel will return EINVAL, but 
>>> userland
>>> can't really know what it was and drop --tls and retry again (or 
>>> print some
>>> useful information). It could be any other parameter provided by the 
>>> user.
>>>
>>> How is userland supposed to do any feature detection?
>>>
>> And that is a good question.
>> I've just removed most of the #ifdef annotations on request from Sagi.
>> If we were going with your suggestion I would need to bring them back.
>>
>> So, Sagi: What should we do?
>> Re-clutter and allow nvme-cli to figure out if TLS is supported?
>> And have it always enabled and invent other means for nvme-cli?
> 
> I don't understand the issue.
> 
> userspace already has a way to know if a feature is supported by reading
> the misc device.
> 
Yes. But the output there is generated by evaluating the fields from the 
fabrics 'opts' structure.

So if the 'tls' option is present it assumes that TLS is supported.
With my current patchset the _option_ is always present, but the 
evaluation of the option once set by nvme-cli might return -EINVAL if 
it's not compiled in.

The request from Daniel is to have the compile option for the fabrics 
'tls' option, too, such that it doesn't show up with the misc device.
IE revert the changes which you requested to convert all the
'#ifdef CONFIG_NVME_TCP_TLS' conditionals.

Cheers,

Hannes


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-18 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-17 13:02 [PATCHv3 00/18] nvme: In-kernel TLS support for TCP Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 01/18] nvme-keyring: register '.nvme' keyring Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 02/18] nvme-keyring: define a 'psk' keytype Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 03/18] nvme: add TCP TSAS definitions Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 04/18] nvme-tcp: add definitions for TLS cipher suites Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 05/18] nvme-keyring: implement nvme_tls_psk_default() Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 06/18] net/tls: implement ->read_sock() Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:14   ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 07/18] net/tls: sanitize MSG_EOR handling Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:19   ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 20:10     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-18 10:07       ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-18 10:24         ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-18 10:39           ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-18 10:43             ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-18 11:02               ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-18 18:28                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 08/18] nvme-tcp: do not set MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:10   ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 15:25     ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:28       ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 15:35         ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 20:16         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-18 10:33           ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-18 18:21             ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-18 18:25               ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 09/18] security/keys: export key_lookup() Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 10/18] nvme/tcp: allocate socket file Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 11/18] nvme-tcp: enable TLS handshake upcall Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:26   ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 15:28     ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:31       ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 15:36         ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-18  5:52   ` Daniel Wagner
2023-04-18  9:38     ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-18 10:12       ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-18 10:28         ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2023-04-18 10:32           ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-18 10:33             ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 12/18] nvme-tcp: control message handling for recvmsg() Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:24   ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 15:26     ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 13/18] nvme-fabrics: parse options 'keyring' and 'tls_key' Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 14/18] nvmet: make TCP sectype settable via configfs Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 15/18] nvmet-tcp: allocate socket file Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:29   ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 13:03 ` [PATCH 16/18] nvmet-tcp: enable TLS handshake upcall Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:03 ` [PATCH 17/18] nvmet-tcp: control messages for recvmsg() Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:03 ` [PATCH 18/18] nvmet-tcp: add configfs attribute 'param_keyring' Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aaa05f01-5047-03ed-2356-2f9544ee4b22@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).