* What are the potential problems if the option CONFIG_MIGRATION is disabled?
@ 2020-06-22 16:16 孙世龙 sunshilong
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: 孙世龙 sunshilong @ 2020-06-22 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kernelnewbies
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 241 bytes --]
As the subject, I find it has some relation with the error: "page
allocation failure: order:9".This error occurs frequently if this option is
disabled. Could memory fragmentation still be reduced by other methods if
this option is disabled?
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 401 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 170 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-06-22 16:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-22 16:16 What are the potential problems if the option CONFIG_MIGRATION is disabled? 孙世龙 sunshilong
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).