kexec.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix an issue with relocatable vmlinux
@ 2023-11-24  8:54 WANG Rui
  2023-11-26  3:28 ` Huacai Chen
  2023-11-27 13:47 ` Simon Horman
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: WANG Rui @ 2023-11-24  8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kexec; +Cc: Varad Gautam, AKASHI Takahiro, Huacai Chen, WANG Rui

Normally vmlinux for LoongArch is of ET_EXEC type, while if built with
CONFIG_RELOCATABLE (this is PIE) and Clang, it will be of ET_DYN type.
Meanwhile, physical address field of segments in vmlinux has actually
the same value as virtual address field.

Similar to arm64, this patch allows to unconditionally skip the check
on LoongArch.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1963
Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn>
---
 kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c b/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c
index bea7b3e..b337642 100644
--- a/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c
+++ b/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c
@@ -39,12 +39,13 @@ static int get_elf_exec_load_base(struct mem_ehdr *ehdr, struct kexec_info *info
 	unsigned long first, last;
 	size_t i;
 
-	/* Note on arm64:
+	/* Note on arm64 and loongarch64:
 	 * arm64's vmlinux has virtual address in physical address
 	 * field of PT_LOAD segments. So the following validity check
 	 * and relocation makes no sense on arm64.
+	 * This is also applies to LoongArch.
 	 */
-	if (ehdr->e_machine == EM_AARCH64)
+	if (ehdr->e_machine == EM_AARCH64 || ehdr->e_machine == EM_LOONGARCH)
 		return 0;
 
 	first = ULONG_MAX;
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix an issue with relocatable vmlinux
  2023-11-24  8:54 [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix an issue with relocatable vmlinux WANG Rui
@ 2023-11-26  3:28 ` Huacai Chen
  2023-11-27 13:47 ` Simon Horman
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Huacai Chen @ 2023-11-26  3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: WANG Rui; +Cc: kexec, Varad Gautam, AKASHI Takahiro

Reviewed-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 4:54 PM WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> wrote:
>
> Normally vmlinux for LoongArch is of ET_EXEC type, while if built with
> CONFIG_RELOCATABLE (this is PIE) and Clang, it will be of ET_DYN type.
> Meanwhile, physical address field of segments in vmlinux has actually
> the same value as virtual address field.
>
> Similar to arm64, this patch allows to unconditionally skip the check
> on LoongArch.
>
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1963
> Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn>
> ---
>  kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c b/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c
> index bea7b3e..b337642 100644
> --- a/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c
> +++ b/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c
> @@ -39,12 +39,13 @@ static int get_elf_exec_load_base(struct mem_ehdr *ehdr, struct kexec_info *info
>         unsigned long first, last;
>         size_t i;
>
> -       /* Note on arm64:
> +       /* Note on arm64 and loongarch64:
>          * arm64's vmlinux has virtual address in physical address
>          * field of PT_LOAD segments. So the following validity check
>          * and relocation makes no sense on arm64.
> +        * This is also applies to LoongArch.
>          */
> -       if (ehdr->e_machine == EM_AARCH64)
> +       if (ehdr->e_machine == EM_AARCH64 || ehdr->e_machine == EM_LOONGARCH)
>                 return 0;
>
>         first = ULONG_MAX;
> --
> 2.43.0
>

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix an issue with relocatable vmlinux
  2023-11-24  8:54 [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix an issue with relocatable vmlinux WANG Rui
  2023-11-26  3:28 ` Huacai Chen
@ 2023-11-27 13:47 ` Simon Horman
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2023-11-27 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: WANG Rui; +Cc: kexec, Varad Gautam, AKASHI Takahiro, Huacai Chen

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 04:54:10PM +0800, WANG Rui wrote:
> Normally vmlinux for LoongArch is of ET_EXEC type, while if built with
> CONFIG_RELOCATABLE (this is PIE) and Clang, it will be of ET_DYN type.
> Meanwhile, physical address field of segments in vmlinux has actually
> the same value as virtual address field.
> 
> Similar to arm64, this patch allows to unconditionally skip the check
> on LoongArch.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1963
> Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn>

Thanks, applied.

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-27 13:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-11-24  8:54 [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix an issue with relocatable vmlinux WANG Rui
2023-11-26  3:28 ` Huacai Chen
2023-11-27 13:47 ` Simon Horman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).